For Authors: March 22, 2017 Issue [#8176]
<< March 15, 2017For Authors Archives | More From This Day | Print This IssueMarch 29, 2017 >>

Newsletter Header
For Authors


 This week: Oscar Gaffe: Conspiracy? Mistake? Both?
  Edited by: THANKFUL SONALI Library Class! Author IconMail Icon
                             More Newsletters By This Editor  Open in new Window.

Table of Contents

1. About this Newsletter
2. A Word from our Sponsor
3. Letter from the Editor
4. Editor's Picks
5. A Word from Writing.Com
6. Ask & Answer
7. Removal instructions

About This Newsletter

Intriguing. Entertaining ...

And heart-warming, or disgusting?

Did it make you feel all fuzzy,
or (fussy? *Wink* ) or just exasperated?

One thing that the mistake did was
to make sure the Oscars got talked about this year.

For all the wrong reasons?
Who's to say?


Word from our sponsor

ASIN: 1945043032
Amazon's Price: $ 13.94


Letter from the editor

Dear Reader,

It has been called the biggest gaffe in Oscar history, and commentators predict that it'll retain the #1 mistake spot forever, 'coz hey, you can't make a bigger mistake than that.

To cut a long story short, first the presenters said that La La Land won best picture, then it turned out that was a mistake, and halfway through La La Land's third acceptance speech, it was announced that the winner was, in fact, Moonlight.

"This is not a joke. Moonlight has won best picture."

(Why am I thinking "A giant leap for Oscarkind" ... ? *Wink* But I digress)

Anyway, the social media went wild with this. And I saw, on a friend's Facebook status, the perhaps inevitable question -- was it a publicity stunt?

Aha.

A PLOT!

I put the question to my writer friends, here on WDC.
(Click *Down* to read what they had to say.)

"OSCAR GAFFE - PUBLICITY STUNT?Open in new Window.

And I was intrigued by the responses. There weren't, perhaps, many individual members responding, but even within the handful, responses ranged from tongue-in-cheek to serious, from *Golucky* to *Irritated* to *Angry* and even *Hug1**Frown**Hug2*.

So if you're writing up the story of the Oscar Gaffe, 2017, here are the scenarios you can look at:

1. Straightforward mistake. Forgive the guy/gal, it could happen to any of us.
2. Straightforward mistake. Don't forgive the guy/gal, aren't they paid just for this?
3. Conspiracy theory, all parties aware and involved -- the Oscars have never been more talked about, heck even Writing Dot Com is doing a newsletter about them! *Crazy*
4. Conspiracy theory -- all participants involved, but only few of them aware ... (Therefore, conspiracy by whom and against whom ... ?)
5. A win-win, both movies got watched by people who wouldn't have known of them otherwise. Doesn't matter, mistake or conspiracy, the outcome was good.
6. Who cares? Why are we falling for it and giving them what they wanted by talking about it?
7. (Any other scenario you come up with.)

And so on and so on. Click on the in-and-out to see how all these scenarios can be explored with varying degrees of heat, and from the point of view of one or the other of those involved. The more you think about it, the more you can get out of the emotion you're playing on. It gets more -- funny, or pathetic, or heart-warming or irritating or boring, as you go deeper and deeper, depending on your take on it.

How come?

Because it was a man-made situation in the first place. So it wasn't an absolute by itself, ever. Had it been more real, it wouldn't have had scope for so many types of responses. Possibly, responses would have just been positive or negative, leaning toward one side or the other. Does this mean that fake situations give more room for exploration, for a writer?

Take another conspiracy on reality TV. One that happened a few years ago, but that I haven't been able to get out of my mind. It was in the show 'The Amazing Race', and there was a team of two guys that was considered to be weaker than the others, and therefore more desirable (read -- beatable) as rivals in a final.

Well, the other teams came up with a fairly elaborate conspiracy to eliminate a stronger team in one of the earlier rounds, to keep these two guys in the contest. The apparently stronger team was out, the two 'weak' guys walked in to the finals, topped the final task and got the $1 million. I am fairly certain, from the faces of some of those rival teams when they saw who the winner was, that this was not scripted! *Laugh*

Was it funny? Certainly. Was it heartwarming? Yes. The guys are now successfully running their dream farm, thanks to the winnings. Was it awfully sad? Yes, from the point of view of that strong team, who could have won. Was it plain stupid? Well, of course, in hindsight, what those others did was plain stupid. But that's in hindsight.

Again, one conspiracy, different reactions -- because the situation was man-made in the first place. Is it good for us writers, or bad? Let's explore that, shall we ... ? *Wink* We're writers, after all. We write about real situations, and we make up our own situations.


Let's just conspire write on!
Thanks for listening,
Sonali.

In case you'd like to take a(nother) peek at the Oscar episode:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KeOxeuiZjs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvK-g1rehpU


And here are the two guys:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPAQU-qxBKo



Editor's Picks

By our authors!

 SIX reasons why UFOs don't exist Open in new Window. [E]
SIX reasons why UFOs don't exist explains in a clear manner why UFOs do not exist.
by aicat Author Icon

 Invalid Item Open in new Window. []

by A Guest Visitor

 Invalid Item Open in new Window. []

by A Guest Visitor

 Paper Open in new Window. [E]
How important is paper in life?
by Dr Taher writes again! Author Icon

 Invalid Item Open in new Window. []

by A Guest Visitor

 J. Edgar Hoover and McCarthyism Open in new Window. [13+]
A conspiracy to expose Communist subversion in the American government.
by Davy Kraken Author Icon

Image Protector
CAN YOU SAY CONSPIRACY THEORY? Open in new Window. [13+]
RFID disaster BEWARE! It is A SPOOF-- NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY,Or is it?
by Ẃeβ࿚ẂỉԎḈĥ Author Icon


Here's a new contest!

Image Protector
The Pink Fluffy Unicorn Contest Open in new Window. [E]
The greatest writing challenge on WDC! PINK FLUFFY RESULTS NOW OUT!!! :)
by Christopher Roy Denton Author Icon


All time favourites!

Image Protector
WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group Open in new Window. [E]
Join the fun! We inspire reviewers through kindness and learning! Winner of eight Quills!
by Maryann Author Icon

Image Protector
The WDC Angel Army Open in new Window. [ASR]
Dedicated to promoting positivity, encouragement, and support to the WDC community.
by iKïyå§ama Author Icon

Image Protector
The Writer's Cramp Open in new Window. [13+]
Write the best poem or story in 24 hours or less and win 10K GPS!
by Sophurky Author Icon


 
Submit an item for consideration in this newsletter!
https://www.Writing.Com/go/nl_form

Word from Writing.Com

Have an opinion on what you've read here today? Then send the Editor feedback! Find an item that you think would be perfect for showcasing here? Submit it for consideration in the newsletter!
         https://www.Writing.Com/go/nl_form

Don't forget to support our sponsor!

ASIN: B004PICKDS
Amazon's Price: Price N/A


Ask & Answer

Thanks for the responses to "For Authors Newsletter (December 28, 2016)Open in new Window.

The article emojis is entertaining and creative fun.-- Apondia Author Icon

Smashing read, as ever. I love emojis, and what a great way to use them as a writing exercise. *ThumbsUpL* *Bigsmile* -- Acme Author Icon

No wonder I never liked emoji's much! How can you get a single emotion across when you know you're actually feeling several? The person you're talking to would definitely have to know the circumstance, how you generally react to things and your personality. What a conundrum. -- Elfin Dragon-finally published Author Icon

Thanks for such advise.I always focus on the text rather than on the emojis.However I like thematic images or videos which enhance the quality of the articles. -- hbk16

I love emojis! I'm definitely one of the people out there who overuse them on a regular basis. *Rolling* And, of course, in my own opinion, there is absolutely no such thing too many emotes! *Bigsmile* *Angelic* -- Dragon is hiding Author Icon

Great commentary on the interplay of emojis and emotions. Loved that you showcased the emojis as I often want something other than a smile but didn't know what or how to locate other emoticons here on WDC! Tag me *Bigsmile* -- tucknits Author Icon

*cough* I'm 60+ and fairly computer savvy, most of the time. My kids love to tease me when I ask where to find things on my smartphone/fascebook etc. I signed on for instagram. I don't use it. i see no need since all my friends (in low places) do FB. I found some of those cute emojis that are dogs, minions, mice, etc. I use them more than the happy faces. When I really laugh at a joke or some cute picture I have a dog ling on its back laughing. I'm not so old I don't like a good joke. I have a HS alum I'm friends with on our grad year group. He posts every day if not two or three times, jokes.
Life is good even when you're older. -- Quick-Quill Author Icon


For any WDC member to collect:


*Bullet* *Bullet* *Bullet* Don't Be Shy! Write Into This Newsletter! *Bullet* *Bullet* *Bullet*

This form allows you to submit an item on Writing.Com and feedback, comments or questions to the Writing.Com Newsletter Editors. In some cases, due to the volume of submissions we receive, please understand that all feedback and submissions may not be responded to or listed in a newsletter. Thank you, in advance, for any feedback you can provide!
Writing.Com Item ID To Highlight (Optional):

Send a comment or question to the editor!
Limited to 2,500 characters.
Word from our sponsor
ASIN: B004PICKDS
Amazon's Price: Price N/A

Removal Instructions

To stop receiving this newsletter, click here for your newsletter subscription list. Simply uncheck the box next to any newsletter(s) you wish to cancel and then click to "Submit Changes". You can edit your subscriptions at any time.


<< March 15, 2017For Authors Archives | More From This Day | Print This IssueMarch 29, 2017 >>

This printed copy is for your personal use only. Reproduction of this work in any other form is not allowed and does violate its copyright.