Mystery: January 02, 2019 Issue [#9269]
<< December 19, 2018Mystery Archives | More From This Day | Print This IssueJanuary 9, 2019 >>




 This week: Mystery or Suspense
  Edited by: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
                             More Newsletters By This Editor  Open in new Window.

Table of Contents

1. About this Newsletter
2. A Word from our Sponsor
3. Letter from the Editor
4. Editor's Picks
5. A Word from Writing.Com
6. Ask & Answer
7. Removal instructions

About This Newsletter

There's a great confusion between the words "mystery" and "suspense." The two things are absolutely miles apart. Mystery is an intellectual process, like in a whodunit. But suspense is essentially an emotional process.
---Alfred Hitchcock


I love whodunits, and I love Hitchcock's films. In the same interview where he makes the above distinction, Hitchcock also describes film devoted to "mystery" as "wasted celluloid." That got me thinking about the difference between "puzzle" mysteries such as those by Ellery Queen or Agatha Christie, and more gritty noir examples of the genre, such as those by Raymond Chandler or Dashiell Hammett. You'll find both sorts in the "mysteries" section in the book store, but they are almost different genres.

Maybe Hitchcock was right. Maybe mystery and suspense are miles apart. See below for my thoughts.


Word from our sponsor

ASIN: B00KN0JEYA
Amazon's Price: $ 4.99


Letter from the editor

Like many people, I love mysteries.

My fascination dates back to childhood, when I read the Perry Mason mysteries my father checked out from the public library, but it continues today. What is that makes mysteries so appealing?

I think the Hitchcock quote above gives a partial answer. I like mysteries, but I'm a mathematician.
I'm all about solving puzzles. In whodunits, there's a crime and a detective. The detective collects a pile of evidence. By the end of the story, the evidence fits together in one and only one way to reveal the criminal. It's an exercise in inductive reasoning, where the detective uses the evidence to construct a theory of the crime. This kind of reasoning resonates with mathematicians, for whom induction is a powerful tool in proving theorems.

So, one of the appealing things about mysteries is solving the puzzle. The reader learns information along with the detective, and it's a race to see who can solve the crime first. Usually, the detective wins, but in a well-written whodunit, the readers will slap their foreheads and say, "Of course! I should have seen that coming."

But Hitchcock is right: solving the puzzle is an intellectual process. In the same interview, Hitchcock claims he never directed a "mystery." Really? You could have fooled me. The Man Who Knew Too Much is surely a mystery. So is Rear Window, or Rebecca, to name two more examples. His point, though, is that the puzzle isn't the heart of the movie. Instead, suspense is the heart of the movie. The energy that drives the plot doesn't come from the clues or even the crime, it comes from elsewhere. It comes from the characters,.

Characters have goals, something they need. Bad things happen if they don't achieve their goals. Those are the stakes. Characters face obstacles in striving for their goals. Tension comes from the conflict between goals and obstacles. The conflict matters because of the stakes. Authors ramp up tension by refining goals or by increasing obstacles and stakes. Tension--suspense, if you will--is the engine that drives the plot and keeps the pages turning.

Hitchcock also observed that the audience cares about the characters. The plot, he continued, is there to give the characters something to care about.

So, what about classic detective novels? Dashiell Hammett said, "What I try to do is write a story about a detective rather than a detective story." If you think about, say, The Maltese Falcon, Sam Spade has a personal stake in solving the murder of his partner. Raymond Chandler's fourth commandment is that a mystery novel "...must have a sound story value apart from the mystery element: i.e., the investigation itself must be an adventure worth reading.

Chandler reviled classic "cozy mysteries" such as those of Agatha Christie. But the detectives in her mysteries have a stake in solving the crime: their reputations rely on it. My all-time favorite TV detective show, Columbo also concentrates on the characters and not the puzzle. In fact, the viewer almost always sees the crime being committed in act one, so there is no mystery about whodunit. The tension comes from the battle of wits between the Everyman, Columbo, and his wealthy, elite suspects. It comes from the characters whose goals are in opposition. Columbo himself is a metaphor for the proverbial Common Man, which makes the stakes high for the viewers, who identify with his rumpled, self-effacing demeanor.

Dashiell Hammett again gives insight to successful mysteries. "Keeping the reader fooled until the last, possible moment is a good trick and I usually try to play it, but I can't attach more than secondary importance to it. The puzzle isn't so interesting to me as the behavior of the detective attacking it."

I'd have to say Hitchcock was right. Solving the puzzle is an interesting intellectual process. But readers care about the solution to the puzzle because they care about the characters. Whether it's Mrs. Marple, or Columbo, or Sam Spade, or the criminal himself, it's the passions of the characters that matter. Goals, stakes, and obstacles are the engine that propel the plot. The puzzle is an interesting device, but it's the characters that keep us riveted to the story.



Editor's Picks

Malaco Malone Open in new Window. (18+)
A young girl is abducted, but then... - 2nd Place Distorted Minds Contest April 2017
#2116501 by Christopher Roy Denton Author IconMail Icon

STATIC
Enemies I Encounter Open in new Window. (18+)
A busy lawyer puts up with a lot in his neighborhood
#2174545 by Lornda Author IconMail Icon

 Invalid Item Open in new Window.
This item number is not valid.
#2126919 by Not Available.

 Invalid Item Open in new Window.
This item number is not valid.
#2175507 by Not Available.

 Invalid Item Open in new Window.
This item number is not valid.
#2118471 by Not Available.

 
STATIC
Not The Juicy Ham Bone! Open in new Window. (ASR)
A dog detective story. Who stole the juicy ham bone?
#2161450 by Choconut Author IconMail Icon


 
Submit an item for consideration in this newsletter!
https://www.Writing.Com/go/nl_form

Word from Writing.Com

Have an opinion on what you've read here today? Then send the Editor feedback! Find an item that you think would be perfect for showcasing here? Submit it for consideration in the newsletter!
         https://www.Writing.Com/go/nl_form

Don't forget to support our sponsor!

ASIN: B083RZ2C5F
Product Type:
Amazon's Price: Price N/A
Not currently available.


Ask & Answer

What's your favorite mystery? Why did you like it? Was it the mystery or the characters?

*Bullet* *Bullet* *Bullet* Don't Be Shy! Write Into This Newsletter! *Bullet* *Bullet* *Bullet*

This form allows you to submit an item on Writing.Com and feedback, comments or questions to the Writing.Com Newsletter Editors. In some cases, due to the volume of submissions we receive, please understand that all feedback and submissions may not be responded to or listed in a newsletter. Thank you, in advance, for any feedback you can provide!
Writing.Com Item ID To Highlight (Optional):

Send a comment or question to the editor!
Limited to 2,500 characters.
Word from our sponsor
ASIN: 197380364X
Amazon's Price: $ 15.99

Removal Instructions

To stop receiving this newsletter, click here for your newsletter subscription list. Simply uncheck the box next to any newsletter(s) you wish to cancel and then click to "Submit Changes". You can edit your subscriptions at any time.


<< December 19, 2018Mystery Archives | More From This Day | Print This IssueJanuary 9, 2019 >>

This printed copy is for your personal use only. Reproduction of this work in any other form is not allowed and does violate its copyright.