%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
 |  This is a continuation of my blogging here at WdC |
| Plotting Techniques pt.2 The final thing I asked my email people came from a few WdCers: What different plotting methods are there? Now, I’m a pantser, so when I teach plotting I use very basic methods, so these come from links I was sent, and different suggestions from those I emailed. This is part two of two about some plotting methods and techniques. Let’s finish this! 6. Work Backwards This is one I got this one from a book (Story-Writing For Teachers and Students, Scholastic, 1996) and it worked very well in my classes with students who knew where they wanted to go but struggled to get there. None of those I emailed mentioned it, but it definitely worked for my classes. It is simple – start with the climax. Write down what is going to happen in the final battle, and the characters involved. Then go back to what led to this and fill in gaps in the plan between the two. Do it again, and again until you get to the beginning. This works well for short stories, not so much for longer works. 7. 27-Chapter Method Attributed to Kat O’Keefe This was a technique advocated by two publishers and two editors aand one author as being ideal for getting a novel “just right.” It is also called the 9-in-3 Block Method, and probably has other names as well. Simply put, it splits the story into the standard 3-act structure, but then divides each act into 9 sections (or blacks), and each of these sections contains one plot point. In Act I, the character starts in their own world, there is a complication, often the character refuses to acknowledge anything is wrong. In Act II, the change has to be admitted to, the character needs to acknowledge it, there is some exploration, there are some skills or knowledge learned. In Act III, everything learnt previously comes to the fore as the character faces the final trial. What this relates to is that each of the three acts has a three act structure of their own, almost self-contained in that regard. That is a simplified version, but many swear by it because of the way it does not leave anything out. Oh, and it does not mean your book needs exactly 27 chapters; that’s just the maths. To quote a website I have now lost: “It is the best method for a writer who feels the need to plan out exactly what is going to happen, when it will happen, and why it will happen.” 8. Fichtean Curve Attributed to John Gardner This is also known as the Dorsal Fin of Doom. The action starts with a crisis, and then follows a series of increasingly more intense crises before the final crisis, the ultimate climax, which then leads to a quick falling action and the denouement. If looked at in visual form, it has the shape of a shark’s dorsal fin with a bunch of bites taken out of the front edge. This is a very simple structure, and results in a series of linked action scenes, but with each one a mini-focus instead of the big picture focus being over-arching. So there is an overall goal, but there are also a series of smaller goals to be attained, all adding to that climax. (Truth be told, this is how a lot of my own fiction is written, even if pantsed.) 9. Freytag’s Pyramid Attributed to Gustav Freytag This method dates back to the 1800s, and involves a clear 5-Act structure for a tragedy, in the strict unhappy ending sense. Introduction: Build the world Rising Action Climax: Things change for the worse Falling Action Catastrophe: The disaster that ends the story. As can be seen, this method puts the climax right in the middle because the character losing it all is the central theme, not the action. Of course, middle is relative. Rising Action and Falling Action do not need to be the same length, and Falling Action is often much shorter. 10. Romancing the Beat Attributed to Gwen Hayes This was recommended to me by an author, and is used exclusively for romance tales, particularly novels. However, it can also be used to plan your romantic sub-plot in any other story. As Hayes puts it, it involves 4 Acts (or phases), and each of these should have 5 story-beats, making a 20-beat story. However, for sub-plot, the 4 phases on their own can be quite effective. The four phases are: 1: Start with the MC, introduce the love interest, set the scene in which the romance should blossom. 2: The couple get to know one another, get to know their lives, but do not enter a full-on relationship. 3: Doubt comes in (from one or both), a conflict appears, there is a break-up (to end the phase). 4: The MC goes into a mental downward spiral, something happens that brings them back together, they realise they need one another, external conflict is closed off, and there is a HEA/HFN ending. These are ones I have heard of in the past and have seen on videos and stuff. However, there was one extra that two authors recommended in passing, which is based on Eastern story-telling. I had to look this up as it was brand new to me and I have no idea if it works or not, so I will leave it here as something you can look into. Kishōtenketsu Consists of: Introduction (ki) Development (sho): Something changes, stakes are introduced Pivotal twist (ten):An unexpected event happens, or the characters cause something unintended to happen. This is what the story is based around. Conclusion (ketsu): Related directly to the beginning. Some consider this method “plotless” in Western terms. What that means is that there is often no conflict. It is a cultural difference, and we should all be aware that the Western dominant way of doing things is not the only way. So, that is plotting. If that is the way you write, then I hope there is something here that can help. |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
