%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
Items to fit into your overhead compartment |
An entry for "Journalistic Intentions"  [18+]:Purcell and Elmslie ...would be a great name for a band. Or, you know, a duo. Like Simon and Garfunkel, Sonny and Cher, or Hall and Oates. You know, when I first heard Hall and Oates on the radio, I thought the DJ called them "Haulin' Oats." I had to verify I didn't switch to a country station accidentally. This is probably why they styled themselves Daryl Hall & John Oates: to avoid precisely that mondegreen. Didn't stop them from failing to enunciate their lyrics (or from writing mayonnaise songs). I suppose they could also have avoided it by being Oates and Hall. Or by coming up with an actual name, like Whitebread or Nospice Boys. (Apparently, when they were roommates in college, their mailbox said Hall & Oates, which is much more legible in print than through a shitty radio).It may seem like I don't like them. This is not the case. They were (and presumably still are, though they divorced last year) talented musicians, and they deserved their fame and airplay; lots of people liked their muzak. It's their genre that leaves me cold, offending me with its inoffensiveness. Simon and Garfunkel, on the other hand, crafted nothing but greatness. Okay, maybe they had a few stinkers, but for the most part, their stuff was amazing. I'd be remiss if, after all that, I didn't mention the musical comedy duo Garfunkel and Oates, a couple of women who usually make me laugh. They apparently named themselves that because of the lower billing of the second names in those duos. One of them apparently called it the "silver medal," which I suppose works better than "second fiddle," because back when I was in an orchestra, in high school, I was often second fiddle. (I didn't mind; the first-chair violinist was much less lazy and much more talented than I was.) It's because of those classic duos, though, that I've often wondered how they decide which order to name themselves in. Maybe it's ego for one of them; musicians can certainly have those. Maybe it's just a matter of marketing, and their manager decides. Maybe they just pick the one that most easily rolls off the tongue; this is almost certainly the case with Sonny and Cher, the latter of which had 90% of the talent. But it still makes me wonder why they didn't just pick a band name, like Walter Becker and Donald Fagen when they came up with Steely Dan (yes, I know, they started out trying to be a multi-person band, but that didn't last long). Would they have achieved their greatness as "Fagen and Becker?" Probably, because they were awesome. But "Steely Dan" is a great name, and the story of how they chose it always makes me smile. For the literary connection, of course. No, I'm not going to link that; feel free to look it up if you don't already know. I guess the band name thing wouldn't work in a more serious profession, like law, medicine, or architecture. I managed, though, when I partnered with one other person to create an engineering and landscape architecture firm: we didn't use our names, but came up with a company name we both liked. That was 100 years after Purcell and Elmslie, though, so I suppose times changed. And look at that, I'm all out of time, and I haven't even addressed the actual title (I will say they were architects). That's okay. I'd never heard of them. Like with the name Steely Dan, the information is out there waiting to be discovered. |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
