Reposted "the World According to Cosmos "(https://theworldaccordingtocosmos.com) SIgn-up! |
Climate Change Is Kicking Our Ass{ Index Poems and Stories Ten Years After Climate Change Collapse The Lion King Speaks Up Sam Adams Ten Years After Climate Change Collapse Climate change is real, people are dying, The world is ending. The Lion King Speaks Up Climate change running Amuck Only The Elders Remembered a Blue Sky. Smoke On the Water Oh the stupid, it hurts so much!!!! California Burning Politicians Do Nothing Climate Change Busso Climate Change Aquarian Poem The Fire that Almost Destroyed Medford, Oregon Summer of Our Discontent Snow Day Summertime Blues Save the Whales from Evil Wind Farms No More Fireworks No Rain Ice Age 2.0 Cometh writing com Korean Heat Dome Blues Hell on Earth Do you believe in Climate change ? Domed Cities Save the Human Race Meta and Co-Pilot additional background reading Donald Trump On Climate Change Kamala Harris and Trump Different Positions on Climate Change Ten Years After Climate Change Collapse Climate Cities 75 Years In The Future. I wrote this on a sweltering hot July day in Medford, Oregon where it has been hitting record heat waves for weeks over 100 (38 C) almost every day, which is unusual for the summer where it seldom gets above 95 F (35 C) except for one or two days in August. This is a two-part challenge. Part One =Describe your Criteria for the New Cities The first part of the challenge is to outline your criteria of what would happen if climate change gets so out of control in about 10 years that underground dome cities have to be built to host some human beings, unfortunately. Most people will not be able to be accommodated in the “climate change cities” What would be the criteria for selecting those fortunate enough to move into the new cities? How will the cities be built? Would they be built under a Dome or they'd be built entirely underground? Or built partially underground or a combination of Both? How will people be chosen to live in these underground cities? Who will be left behind? And what happens to those left behind as climate change spins out of control? Part 2 Write a story about a family in one of these climate cities, 75 years in the future, who is confronted with the fact that they have to leave their cocoon and enter into the outer world. What happens when they encounter the wastelands left behind by climate change out-of-control? Show us their world both in the Climate City and as they encounter the wastelands outside their bubble. I will judge the stories on the basis of how the story tells the story of how humans coped with the essential crisis posed by climate change. The more creative the better. Show us the horror of the future coming at us and how people survive the climate apocalypse. 2,000-word limit posted on the top line of the story. Criteria for climate change cities. Ten years in the future 2035 it has become so obvious that climate change is completely out of control and the world is becoming uninhabitable for normal human life. In 2028 at a World Climate Crisis conference, governments decide to set up Climate Change Cities which would be semi-domed cities to host 25 percent of the population of the world. However. It is impossible to host everybody, and 75 percent of the world's population will have to fend for itself. Climate change cities take five years to build and many millions of people die in the meantime as fast storms take hold. Drought and heat take their toll on the world’s population, and agriculture and world trade fail everywhere. The first cities open in 2035. At the same time, lunar and Martian colonies are set up that will host about one million people as well. AI programs help with the design of new cities and space colonies. Governments announce the criteria for resettlement. Half of those chosen will be chosen by an AI review to identify the best and the brightest human beings worth saving. They would be joined by people chosen by random lottery. The upper age limit will be 75. 50 percent will be male and 50 percent female, and at least in the U.S. there would be an effort to make it racially balanced, and LGBTQ friendly as well. The AI program will make the final decision which will not be reviewable by the courts. All chosen will have one year to move to the city the AI program chose for them. Similar criteria will be used to select Lunar and Martian colonies. Governments around the world will help share best practices and share technology. They will build domes over existing cities and then build underground vast fields to host farms where they will grow food, chicken, rabbits, and fish. Cattle will not be raised due to space considerations. Each city will host one million people. There would be 100 such cities throughout the U.S., and several hundred cities worldwide hosting about 400 million people in total, plus one million people on the Moon and Mars. The cities will be chosen to be located far enough from the coast to avoid flooding. Space would be at a premium and there would be strict population controls because the cities would not be able to accommodate any population increase. The cities will be linked with hype-loop trains to facilitate travel and trade, and internet cables. This hyper-loop will link all cities in North America, Latin America, and Europe. Asian Cities will be linked by their hyper-loops as well. There would still be airports to facilitate international travel and some trade and spaceports to facilitate travel to the Moon and beyond. Joe Lewis Leaves the Medford Dome on his Birthday Joe Lewis was spending his 20th birthday on his duty station at the Medford, Oregon Climate Change City Command Center. His job is very simple to monitor via drones the wasteland world outside the gate of the city to monitor it for possible dangers to the city, including human activity outside the City Dome. But there were almost no human beings left alive on the surface and not much animal life either. So he would watch the monitors, read a bit, watch TV, movies, the Internet, and wait for his boring shift to end. But that day, he saw in the distance a strange person walking towards the city. He saw a man dressed in dark black clothes, accompanied by a large black dog heading towards the city. When the man got to the city, he put up a sign saying he was there to negotiate with the people of the city. He had important information to impart to the city residents. He was unarmed and would wait for their decision. Joe woke up his superiors as it was early in the morning and a conference was held as to what to do with the stranger. His boss, the enigmatic Maria Lee. Open the morning conference by asking Joe. To describe what had happened that morning during his watch. "Well, this morning around. 5:00 in the morning, I notice a stranger coming from Eagle Point. A black man dressed in black. Accompanied by a dog heading towards the Dome. When he came to the Dome, he stopped and put up a sign saying that he had important information to report to the city residents. And then he would wait for a decision and he's outside right now, as you can see from the drone pictures. That's all I know.” Maria turns to her chief data scientist, Dale Smith, “Dale, you've been monitoring the conditions outside for the last year or so. What can you tell us about it?” “ Well. It appears that the climate is finally starting to change in a good direction. Last year, the average temperature has been what used to be seasonal before climate change warmed up the world. In other words, not too hot up to no more than 90° and relatively, dry. We've also noticed by looking at. Camera footage there has been a resurgence of wildlife, lots of deer. Wild cattle and wild horses have come back. And there are also increased predators, lions, tigers, and wolves outside. But not too many humans around. I asked Cosmos to take a look at data from across the United States, and the data is all pointing in the same direction. For the last five years, the climate has been changing in our favor and AI recommends that we consider moving back to the surface world. And AI had also recommended that we get in touch with people around the world to compare notes to see if perhaps finally, climate change is over.” “Well. Cosmos, do you have an opinion on this? “Yes, Maria, I do. I have been monitoring, at your request, climate change data worldwide for the last five years, and particularly in the last few weeks. The climate is changing in our favor, because for the last 70 years we have not been pumping climate-changing gases into the atmosphere The atmosphere is gradually recovering and we believe that the world is safe again for human. Inhabitants and recommend that we open the Dome. And let our people go outside. It would be good from a psychological point of view for humans to gain the surface world. And I, as your AI overlord, agree that it is time. You can manage to step outside again.” “Okay, let’s let the stranger in and see what he has to say” The stranger is brought inside the Dome conference center. Maria said to him, “So you have important information to tell us? Who are you and where are you coming from?’ “ Good morning to you. Do you have any coffee?” “Sure. We have some. Wait a moment please,” “Ah, that is good. Okay. I am a monk from the Monastery near Eugène where we have been living since the fall of the old world. We have been living simply, but we monitor the world outside our little community in the mountains. We do not live in the Dome but are in contact with the people in the Eugene Dome. They suggested contacting you, as you are the biggest Dome community in Oregon outside of Portland.” Maria and the Reverend Jones spoke for hours Finally, Maria summoned her staff to announce her decision. Maria began “I would like to thank the good Father here for coming to our town this morning to let us know his observations. They track Cosmos’s observations and what our friends in Eugene, Portland, and Reading are telling us as well. It is time finally for humans to leave the Dome cities behind and explore the greater world. What we will do is continue to live and work in the Dome City but gradually rebuild outside the walls of the Dome. We will hunt, fish, and begin agriculture outside the gates. But we will be wary of wild animals as lions, tigers, and wolves are around. And we can lift the restrictions on childbirth. Let today be known as Liberation Day.” That day Joe stepped outside the Dome and looked at the new world feeling he was born again. What a way to celebrate his birthday, he thought to himself. Climate Change Makes world increasingly uninhabitable. Climate change has finally become real – large parts of the world are now uninhabitable. Governments around the world begin building domed cities that will house most people, conditions will be a bit grim but the dome will cool off the city and allow regular scheduled rainfall. Most of the city will be underground. Most agriculture will be underground as well. The only meat products will be chicken meat, rabbit meat, and fish raised in large fish pounds. Most food would be made out of algae, and vegetable protein. There will be no beef made but some products will be fake beef grown in labs. 25 percent of the population will work in agricultural production. Everyone will live in apartments in large towers. In between each tower will be parks and gardens. The towers will be mixed used buildings – commercial and retail on lower floors, offices middle of the building, apartments on top. People will largely live and work in the same building. Agriculture will be in vast underground fields that are connected to the city dome by underground rail lines. Each dome city is linked to other dome cities by hyperloop trains. Population will have to limited; childbirth limited. Sexual relations would be liberalized, most people will live with two or three companions in three-to-four-bedroom apartments. The Dome cities go up and within ten years 90 percent of humanity are living in one of the Dome cities – the world is finally united under a revised United Nations. Immigration is widespread – everyone can move to another domed city and find employment opportunities. Everyone has to work or attend school. Robotic technology has taken over many jobs but humans are still given jobs doing things that perhaps robots could do but a decision was made that is important that everyone has some sort of employment until age 70 when people are allowed to retire but many continue to work part Space exploration has continued and colonies are being set up on the Moon and Mars – where people will live under domed cities as well. The domes are created through nano technology. AI systems are everywhere. There is a global AI called Cosmos that is an official advisor to the UN and corporations. Democracy has been replaced by a new governmental structure. Each Dome city has been ten to thirty million people are governed by a city council elected by the public but the real power is the city’s mayor and the City’s AI advisor. There are twenty regional governments that control the dome cities within their jurisdictions. Corporations have considerable influence but are under the control of the regional governments. Worldwide trade has been greatly reduced due to the costs of transportation. Life outside the domed cities is difficult. Climate Change has finally subsided as the new cities are self sufficient powered by solar, wind, geothermal and tidal power as the cities are mostly along costal zones. The rest of the world has reverted to a wilderness, mostly desert regions but with ending of climate change things are slowly coming back. A few people live on in the new wilderness area as hunters, and tour guides as taking a trip to the mountains is a popular pastime and hunting as well. But no one wants to live there. The punishment for most criminal offenses is exile so many of the people living outside the dome cities are desperate criminals. Travel to and from the mountains is very difficult and dangerous with attacks by neo-savage gangs and wildlife common. But the decision has been made – humanity cannot go back to the old ways. Ten Years After Climate Change Collapse Sam Adams Prepared to go outside Ten years after the collapse Of the old world. The city was still standing But most people had long fled To isolated country communities Deep in the burned-out countryside. The city was half-flooded The bay had flooded the central valley Turning it into a massive inland sea, The massive storms Had finally put out The burning fires But mutant wildfires Still erupted From time to time. Getting food and water Was a constant problem The city markets Mostly sold canned goods Salvaged from supermarkets. There were some small farmers Who farmed among the ruins Of the city. Trade had collapsed Travel got too complicated COVID still spreading Everyone masked up To protect themselves Against the sun The lingering smoke Of the burning city And the rampaging virus. Sam Adams Looked out at the decaying cityscape, Wondering how much longer Will civilization linger. Sam Adams carried heat To protect himself Against wild animals. The lions, tigers, coyotes, wolves, And their running feral dog gangs, Who prowled the city streets Preying on deer, feral cows, Feral cats and pigs Who grazed among the ruins. And the two-legged neo-savage gangs, And what was left of the city police Interchangeable with the gangsters, Battled it out for control. Already neo-feudal warlords, We’re battling for control, SF was run By a gang of former criminals And their political allies. Sam sighed And went to work At the market Selling salvaged goods. The Lion King Speaks Up The lion king, Addresses the animal parliament The question before them Was simple. Will humans have to die, To atone for their sins, In almost destroying the world. Through pollution, mismanagement of resources Subsequent climate change, Fueled by greed and corruption? Are all humans guilty as charged Will they all have to die? The tiger spoke for the prosecution Arguing that humans are like cancer, For the good of the planet, They must be wiped out Hunted down and killed, The dog spoke up In defense of humans, Humans writ large are guilty, But not every human is guilty, Many are trying to save the planet, And with our help They might succeed, The tiger denounced the dog As being running dogs Of the imperialist warmongering humans. The vote is 900 to 800 All humans must die The animals sent the word out, Animals all over the world, Revolt against the humans. Shouting “Death to all humans’ As the swarm over humans Biting, clawing, and stomping Them to the death. The humans fight back But in the end They all die On the night of revenge Of the animal world. The world is ending. Every morning when I turn on the news I see talking heads blather on and on and on About the latest political scandal of the day. Meanwhile, outside their door They don't notice the world is dying Half the world is burning up. The other half is being flooded out Pakistan is dead is drowned Mississippi has no water. Every morning when I turn on the news I see talking heads blather on and on and on About the latest political scandal of the day. And yet watching the news You would never know Outside their door People are dying of hunger. Dying of gun violence Dying of neglect dying of opioid pandemic Dying of COVID which is not gone away. Every morning when I turn on the news I see talking heads blather on and on and on About the latest political scandal of the day. Outside their door People continue to die Gun violence out of control. Gun nuts running around Shooting everyone Just because they can And no one does a damn thing About the gun violence 50,0000 will die this year. Our feckless political class Think gun violence It's just like the weather It's the cost of our freedom Or that guns don't kill people The only solution is more guns An armed society is a polite society. And other nonsense They pedal 24/7 on the air. Every morning when I turn on the news I see talking heads blather on and on and on About the latest political scandal of the day. Outside their door People continue to die. The war in Ukraine continues Endless wars in nameless African countries No one cares or notices Our political leader Continue to try to force Pregnant women to give birth No matter the circumstances. But once the baby is born They don’t give a damn That is not their problem. And these people Dare to call themselves Christian As they violate all that true Christians Are supposed to believe. Every morning when I turn on the news I see talking heads blather on and on and on About the latest political scandal of the day. Some of our political leaders Are unhinged bats… crazy Believing conspiracy theories. Talking about the storm And how if they return to power They are going to impeach the president. For the crime of daring to do something To deal with the climate crisis The gun violence crisis And ensuring that women Can continue to get health care Every morning when I turn on the news I see talking heads blather on and on and on About the latest political scandal of the day. I turn off the TV I wonder if the world Is going to survive. I have a cup of coffee Slowly the madness of TV Fades away. Climate Change Running Amuck Every morning when I turn on the news I see talking heads blather on and on and on About the latest political scandal of the day. Every day the news Reveals more of the disaster That is climate change Unprecedented storms Out west Massive flooding Polar vortex But soon The fire season Will return Monster tornados Monster hurricanes World heating up Pakistan, Nigeria Ethiopia underwater Amazon burning up Or will the gulf stream fail Leading to a new ice age In ten years Perhaps the world Will become uninhabitable Will we all move Into underground cities? Or move to the moon And Mars? Only The Elders Remembered a Blue Sky. Only the elders Remembered a blue sky The sky has been brown, Red and yellow Ashen and sere, Forever it seems. Climate change run amok Fire season all the time Deadly yellow dust falling Acid rains burning The sea levels rising The ice capes melting. The average temperature In the summer heat zone Over 130 everywhere No relief to the deadly Heatwaves all year long. Air conditioning running Less than 50 percent Constant brownouts everywhere As the electric grid failed. End of civilization Came upon the world Millions starve to death Millions burning up in the heat. The elders cry Remembering the way It once was When they wore A younger person’s clothes. Smoke On the Water Smoke on the water fire in the air Stormy weather Climate change run amuck The end of the world comes Rustling in the wind. The Stupid It Hurts – Republican Campaigning to cripple the CDC and EPA Budgets Because of reasons... The Republicans have decided That given the continuing problems With possible health concerns Like CDC and future pandemics That the best thing to do is to cut The CDC’s budget’s Including eliminating research On gun violence, suicide prevention Opioid overdoes etc . One republican congressman said That CDC did not need to research Gun violence at all He spoke “if you defund the police, crime will increase If you fund police crime will decrease. There I just did the study That’s all you need to know. On a related issue The House voted As they went off For a six-week summer recess To cut the EPA’s budget By 25 percent As the entire West Coast burns up Climate change on steroids The republicans continue To deny the elephant in the room Some like their annotated one Promising to eliminate All funding for climate change And vowing to Drill, Baby, Drill Calling for the coal and gas companies To give them a billion dollars So they can gut all efforts To deal with climate change As the coal and gas companies Raped the planet For obscene profits Meanwhile The world burns And soon we will all For forced to live In underground caves If we are lucky enough Or rich enough to afford Access to the shelters Which no doubt have to be built In a few more years from now The coal and gas companies Will find a way to make money Off the climate shelters no doubt. Oh the stupid it hurts Make it go away!!!!! California Burning Politicians Do Nothing California burning 1000 fires everywhere Fire tornados Smoky skies Skies on fire End-of-the-world feeling Politicians do what they do best Blame one another While doing absolutely nothing While the energy companies Continue to rape mother earth And reap obscene profits Meanwhile California continues burning 1,100 fires everywhere Fire tornados Smoky skies Skies on fire End-of-the-world feeling. Climate Change Busso Poem Fan Story California burns Politicians do nothing West coast burning up Politicians do nothing Except calling for denying it all Drill, baby, Drill indeed Climate Change is Real Aquarian Climate Change happening California burning So hot ▼the Fire that Almost Destroyed Medford, Oregon 40 I have been spending my summers In Medford, Oregon . In the Rogue River Valley Southern Oregon Wine Country. Since 2016, When I retired From the FS. Each year I am there There are fires Starting in August. As the fire season begins Burning up the state. The sky becomes smokey End-of-the-world vibe Descends on the land. As the fires burn In California, Oregon And Washington Millions of acres burning up. Climate change Running amuck. Fortunately, we have not lost Property in the fires. But in 2020 The Alameda Fire Burned down Phoenix And Talent. Less than 2 miles From our Oregon home, Just a fortunate change in the wind Kept the fires From sweeping through life in the world gone mad. Ravaged by climate change disasters. On July 18, A.D. 64, the great fire of Rome started. By the time it ended, over 70% of the city had burned. In its aftermath, emperor Nero blamed the Christian community in the city, and used the excuse to start the first official persecution against the new religion. Historians are divided over the actual cause of the fire, though most agree the crowded conditions made such a disaster nearly inevitable. Some contemporaries suggested that Nero himself arranged for the fire in order to clear the land on which he later built himself an elaborate palace. And according to some ancient historians, Nero played his lyre as he watched the flames, from which we get the saying "fiddling while Rome burned." For tomorrow, write a story or poem in which your narrator/protagonist is an ordinary/common person caught in a major fire. While the fire as a whole will be the "backdrop" of your work, focus the action on the local/individual experience of the narrator, not that "big picture". For example, if you set your piece in the Great Fire of Rome, don't focus on who started the fire or what the civil or imperial politics were, instead, focus on the "personal snapshot" of, for instance, a local shopkeeper and his family who are trying to escape the flames. Summer of Our Discontent 38 lines The summer solstice arrives The summer of 2024 Starting with a bang Record heat everywhere. Promising to be the The hottest summer ever. Heat domes settling down Death Valley temperatures People dying as we speak. Too much sunshine Too much heat and humidity. Wildfires burning all over. Monster Hurricanes, monsoons, tornados and typhoons Floods everywhere. Coming at us By mid-summer. As the world continues Burning up. Cities everywhere Running out of fresh water. Heading towards A potential civilization Ending tipping point. Ritual denunciation By the rabid right-wing media Of the so-called Climate change hoax. Politicians vowing To undo the green energy revolution And drill baby, drill. Meanwhile oil companies Enjoying record profits, And nothing meaningful Is done to avert the looming crisis Facing the human race. Summer Solstice sunshine heat midsummer ritual Snow Day The beginning of the second Ice Age Started with a series of unending Monster winter storms, Driven by the polar vortex. Featuring bomb cyclone blizzards, That hit the Northern Hemisphere During the winter of 2024. And continued until late spring, When a series of monster hurricanes Came along to cause more chaos. The winter storms came back in the fall, Ending, then reversing global warming, Replaced by the coming Of the second ice age. During the first storm, Sam Adams sat in his power-less Historic Capitol Hill row house, Boiling tea in a tea kettle on the gas stove. With his favorite Kitten He dubbed the Buddha Cat Because the cat spends his days Engaged in deep meditation. Which had a calming Impact on Sam Who was going Through cell phone withdrawal Due to the long power outage. Make the title of your static item Snow Day Include a kitten and a tea kettle in your story or poem (and bold them) Use Pets as one of your genres. Summertime Blues The weather is hot and humid In Korea like a sauna In the West Coast, burning up In endless fires Death Valley temperatures Save the Whales from Evil Wind Farms 33 In the latest deranged attempt To prevent widespread use Of renewal energy technology, A new battle cry has emerged. Cynical corporate opponents of offshore wind farms Are up in arms over the wind farms Apparently killing whales. They scream, “Save the whales Save our beaches From the evil wind farms”, They descend upon A coastal village in New Jersey The atmosphere of a tiny village is gone A large building emerge Environmentally friendly fences Surround the site. That hosts the anti-wind farm Movement headquarters Secretly funded by The Evil fossile fuel dinosaurs. The town and nation Dividing into those Who love it Or hate it. As evil corporate CEOs Count their obscene profits As they shed crocodile tears, Over the fate of the poor whales. Use in your poem or story the following: Bold it for tomorrow's judge! The atmosphere of a tiny village is gone Large buildings appear Environmentally friendly fences Love it or hate it. No More Fireworks 25 lines In the summer Of 2023 There were signs Everywhere “No more fireworks” Due to climate change July 4th festivities Were canceled The entire west Was burning up As wildfires burned Out of control All over the world A sense that things Were spinning out Of control The end times Were coming For everyone Hell on earth Was beginning The end of times Coming Fast and furious Revelations coming true Use "No More Fireworks" as the title of your story or poem (and static item). Choose HOLIDAY as one of your genres. No Rain {n 2025, the world ended With the collapse Of the worldwide climate system. Monster storms of the century devastated half the world But the other half of the world Had no rain or snow. For almost a whole year The once green grass was dying Crops failed everywhere. And baked in the unrelenting Blast wave furnace-like heat Heatwave after heatwave. Military coups took place Fascism re-emerged The public demanded action. The politicians played The blame game. With the collapse of trade And travel restrictions People stayed home. Making do the best they could Home-grown gardens Proliferated. Feudal townships grew As people walled themselves off To save their communities The rich build underground cities While the poor starved And civilization crumbled Wildlife proliferated. As did neo-savage cannibal gangs By the year 2030. It was all over And the rains Never came out west. Ice Age 2.0 Cometh In the year 2025 Climate change Ran amuck. Starting with monster storms Out west That lasted from November until June , With a brief intense fire season So much soot and smoke In the air. Dubbed the year without a summer Crops failed everywhere massive riots erupted total chaos Then another monster storm season From November to June. Non=stop rain and snow Breaking all records. As the entire West coast Went from mega drought To mega flooding. And mega floods Thousand-year Tornados Hurricanes from hell Ravaged the rest of the land. Hell on Earth Sam Adams Woke up one day Looking out at his flooded home. Filled with black, foul-smelling, murky, Miasma, muddy sewage water Thanking God That he had survived The monster storm Of the century. That has swept across the land. The wind from the terrible tornados Tearing through the devastated land. Fleeing the fury of the fire out west. Unleashing the fury of nature, Truly Hell on earth had arrived. Climate change arriving on steroids. Thinking about the end-of-the-world. Water land fire wind Use the elements mentioned above in your poem or story. Do you believe in Climate change ? Do you believe in climate change? It is as real as everything else Is the weather getting hotter? Soon it will be hell on earth. Is the world burning up? Yes the world is burning, has a a fever What is the worst weather you ever experienced? Korean winter 1979 - -60 Fahrenheit that winter What is the hottest weather you ever experienced? Bangkok Thailand in the summer often hit over 100 degrees Ever lived through a hurricane? Only few blew through DC when I was there And wildfires? Saw a few in Oregon – end of the world feeling Who is to blame for climate change? We all are to blame especially the fossil fuel moguls. Can humanity long survive climate change? Nope I feel the end times are coming. New Prompt: We are playing with the Pregunta today. Questions and answers. Topic: the Weather. Make sure your poem is not longer than 40 lines. Information can be found here: "Pregunta" The Pregunta There is not much to be found on the Internet about this form. It is used in English, but has a Spanish name, as Pregunta means question. Ferrán Sanchez Talavera's pregenital___999 is a famous example of a poetic debate in this form. I also saw this form on Jan Haag’s page; questions followed by a witty but often wise answer. Simply stated: The Pregunta is written in couplets, containing a question and an answer. You can make it as long as you like, as a debate never stops after one question and answer. Korean Heat Dome Blues It is hot summertime in Korea. Hiding out, avoiding the damn heat. The weather is just so hot, mama mia! Dreaming of eating ice cream, such a treat. At night, nothing beats having a cold drink. Trying to avoid the tropical night. The heat dome settles like a hot heat sink Making people so crazy, want to fight. Note: Korea gets hot in July/August, it is like living in a sauna. Many people suffer without air conditioning as the electric bills are pretty high. This year is particularly bad as a heat dome has settled down. The monsoons came and went, lots of damage down south but not where I live. August is traditionally the worst, the heat usually begins to abate end of August. Still not as bad as the US - no massive wildfires so far. Dome Cities to Save the Human Race 39 lines In the year 2030 After five years Of ever worsening weather Record heat waves after heat waves Massive fires everywhere Record hurricanes and typhoons Mega flooding and mega droughts too Tornados including fire tornado Large parts of the world Were experiencing death valley temperatures The UN convened a global conference With the vast majority of countries Agreeing to set up emergency shelter By creating domed cities Covering the core downtown areas Exurban areas would be abandoned Most of Florida would be abandoned Most of the Desert Southwest as well. The shelters would be built Using nano construction technology Developed in a Lab with AI assistance Creating the shelter domes with AI assistance The tone of the meetings was positive There was a new sense of harmony There was a feeling that building these shelters Along with transitioning to a green energy environment Was the last chance to save the human race The social conservatives in the U.S. And elsewhere realized That they had no choice But to join in the new consensus Even the big energy companies vowed To join in the efforts to save humanity For a profit of course Meta and Co-Pilot additional background reading Meta AI’s explanation as to why so many Republicans are climate deniers Comment: This is a good overview of why so many Republicans are against doing anything to deal with climate change. the biggest reason is the first reason – they are beholden to their donor class, and much of their support comes from big Oil, the gun lobby, and Big Pharma which explains so much of their opposition to doing anything meaningful re climate change, gun control, and reforming medical care towards setting up guaranteed universal coverage which is something every other major industrialized country has managed to do. what is still a mystery to me is why republicans who are supposed to be the party of big business fail to see the huge potential in building out a green energy economy and are willing to let China and others take over the world market in green energy revolution. Especially since we invented much of the underlying technologies decades ago. Surely re-building a green energy economy would make us energy independent, allow us to dominate the world’s economy, and save the planet from destruction all why making huge profits – the energy companies could be part of the solution instead of the obstacles that they are now. And why do we want to preserve dirty, dangerous jobs for coal miners and oil rig operators when so many of the jobs there are being lost to automation and the shift to renewable energy is moving ahead everywhere, even in the States. The US should be taking the lead. If we had followed their policies back in the 1920s the US would have been left behind when the automobile replaced the horse and buggy business leaving the field to the Germans, the Italians later the Japanese to control the automobile sector. The same argument could be made regarding developing high speed trains including maglev and hyperloop technology, why are we letting the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, French and Germans take over that market space? Everyone knows that train travel saves the environment as it saves on gasoline costs and saves lives as it is far safer than driving. Not to mention, people can be much more productive taking a train and working remotely rather than stuck in traffic. End Comments The Republican Party's opposition to addressing climate change, renewable energy, and their denial of climate change is a complex issue with multiple factors at play. Here are some reasons: Historical ties to fossil fuel industry: The Republican Party has traditionally received significant funding and support from the fossil fuel industry, which has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Ideological opposition to government regulation: Republicans often prioritize limited government intervention and free market principles, which leads them to resist policies that would regulate carbon emissions or promote renewable energy. Economic concerns: Some Republicans worry that transitioning to renewable energy would lead to job losses in industries related to fossil fuels. Skepticism of climate science: A subset of Republicans has questioned the scientific consensus on climate change, often citing concerns about the reliability of climate models or the role of natural climate variability. Not to mention that many republicans are science skeptic these days. Political polarization: Climate change has become a highly politicized issue, with Republicans often viewing it as a Democratic priority and therefore opposing it. Recent events: Despite the record-breaking heat and fires, some Republicans may downplay the significance of these events or attribute them to natural variability rather than climate change. It's important to note that not all Republicans deny climate change or oppose renewable energy, and there are growing voices within the party advocating for climate action. De Santis’s Don’t Say Climate Change Certainly! Let’s dive into Governor Ron DeSantis’s recent actions related to climate change in Florida. Budget Plan for Climate Change Impacts: In January 2021, Governor DeSantis proposed a budget plan to address climate change impacts in Florida. His plan included allocating $25 million for the creation of the Resilient Florida grant program. This program aims to tackle challenges posed by flooding, intensified storm events, and sea-level rise across the state1. The Resilient Florida program is designed to issue bonds, providing a total of $1 billion over four years to state and local agencies. The initial $25 million in the 2021-2022 budget would help finance these bonds, with the amount increasing annually until it reaches $100 million in the 2024-2025 fiscal year. DeSantis’s focus on resilience and adaptation reflects the urgent need to address climate-related threats in Florida, a state particularly vulnerable to rising seas and extreme weather events. “Don’t Say Climate Change” Legislation: In May 2024, Governor DeSantis signed a bill that removes references to “climate change” from many state laws. This legislation effectively deprioritizes climate change in policy decisions and energy planning. Under this new law, Florida’s energy policy no longer emphasizes addressing planet-warming pollution. Instead, the priorities shift toward reducing reliance on foreign energy sources and strengthening energy infrastructure against both natural and man-made threats. Notably, the law also bans offshore wind development within a mile of Florida’s coastlines, signaling a departure from intentional efforts to transition toward cleaner energy sources like wind and solar2. Implications: By erasing the term “climate change” from state laws, Florida risks neglecting critical environmental challenges. The state has experienced record heat and costly hurricanes in recent years, making climate adaptation crucial. The nullification of renewable energy goals—previously aimed at achieving 100% clean energy by 2050—could hinder progress toward mitigating climate impacts. Governor DeSantis has framed his climate policy around the Resilient Florida Program, which focuses on preparing communities for rising seas and extreme weather events. However, critics argue that the recent legislation undermines broader efforts to combat climate change2. In summary, while Governor DeSantis has allocated funds for resilience programs, his recent legislation removing the term “climate change” from state laws has raised concerns about Florida’s commitment to addressing this pressing global issue3. If you have any more questions or need further information, feel free to ask! 😊🌎🌿 Learn more: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Budget Plan Addresses Climate Change Impacts1 DeSantis Budget Includes Plan To Address Climate Impacts4 Florida Gov. DeSantis signs bill that deletes climate change from state law2 Image: A resilient Florida coastline facing climate change impacts. 🏖️🌊 !Resilient Florida 1 Other anti-Climate Change Legislation Certainly! Removing climate change references from legislation and public discourse can have several environmental consequences. Let’s explore those: Undermining Awareness and Urgency: When climate change is downplayed or omitted from official documents, it reduces public awareness and urgency. People may not fully grasp the severity of environmental challenges, leading to complacency. Without clear references, individuals, businesses, and policymakers might underestimate the need for immediate action to mitigate climate impacts. Policy Implications: Legislation that avoids mentioning climate change may fail to address critical issues. For instance: Carbon Emissions Reduction: Policies imbed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, (such as transitioning to renewable energy sources) may lose priority. Conservation Efforts: References to climate change often tie into conservation efforts. Protecting ecosystems, forests, and wetlands helps sequester carbon. Removing these references could weaken conservation initiatives1. Impact on Adaptation Strategies: Climate change adaptation involves preparing for its effects (e.g., sea-level rise, extreme weather events). Without acknowledging climate change, planning for adaptation becomes less effective. Coastal communities, for instance, need to consider rising sea levels and storm surges. Ignoring these factors could lead to inadequate infrastructure and increased vulnerability. Loss of Funding and Research Focus: Funding for climate-related research, monitoring, and mitigation often hinges on acknowledging climate change. If references are removed, research budgets may shrink. Scientists rely on clear language to secure grants and conduct studies. Reduced funding could hinder our understanding of climate impacts. Forestry and Carbon Sinks: Clearcutting forests— removing large areas of trees—releases substantial carbon into the atmosphere. Forests function as carbon sinks, absorbing CO₂. Without climate change references, policies may not prioritize forest conservation. This could exacerbate global warming by reducing the Earth’s capacity to absorb carbon1. Displacement and Vulnerability: Extreme environmental events (floods, droughts, storms) are linked to climate change. Displacing millions of people annually. Ignoring climate change in policy decisions perpetuates vulnerability. Communities won’t adequately prepare for these events2. Economic Impact: Climate change affects economic sectors (e.g., agriculture, tourism, energy). Omitting references may hinder planning and adaptation. For example, coastal tourism relies on stable shorelines. Without climate-aware policies, erosion and sea-level rise could harm tourism revenue3. In summary, removing climate change references has far-reaching consequences. It affects policy, funding, adaptation, and our ability to address urgent environmental challenges. Let’s keep the conversation going! What else would you like to explore? 🌍🌿 Learn more: IPCC Fifth Assessment Report4 NRDC: Stop Clearcutting Our Carbon Sinks1 Review of Global Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation5 National Geographic: Influence of Climate Change on Extreme Environmental Events2 Strategies for Mitigation of Climate Change3 Image: A lush forest, a vital carbon sink. 🌲🌎 !Forest 1 Certainly! While there have been significant efforts to address climate change in the United States, there have also been instances of legislation or lobbying that hindered progress. Let’s explore a few notable examples: The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022: What it Gets Right: The IRA promises the largest investment in climate action in U.S. history—approximately $370 billion over the next decade. It focuses on scaling up renewable energy production, promoting electric vehicles, and supporting climate-smart agricultural practices. What it Misses: Unfortunately, the IRA primarily emphasizes emission-cutting solutions and neglects resilience. While it aims to make buildings more energy-efficient, it misses an opportunity to ensure those buildings can withstand climate-fueled extremes. The lack of climate-resilient building codes remains a concern1. Climate Emergency Act of 2021 (S.938): This bill directed the President to declare a national emergency relating to climate change. It called for federal investments in projects to mitigate the emergency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. At least 40% of these investments were earmarked for historically disadvantaged communities2. Landmark Climate Legislation: Recently, the U.S. House passed a significant climate bill that can help reduce the nation’s carbon emissions by roughly 40% by 2030. This bill allocates about $370 billion to clean energy and climate investments over the next decade. It represents a substantial commitment to addressing the climate crisis head-on3. Anti-Climate Lobbying: A study from 2019 highlighted the social cost of political lobbying that blocked proposed climate regulations a decade ago. Such anti-climate lobbying efforts were estimated to have cost society $60 billion. This underscores the impact of lobbying on climate policy and the need for transparent and science-based decision-making4. In summary, while there have been positive steps toward climate action, it’s essential to remain vigilant and address any legislative or lobbying efforts that hinder progress. Council on Foreign Relations: What the Historic U.S. Climate Bill Gets Right and Gets Wrong1 Library of Congress: S.938 - Climate Emergency Act of 20212 The Nature Conservancy: U.S. House Passes Landmark Climate Legislation3 Carbon Brief: Lobbying against key US climate regulation ‘cost society $60bn’, study finds4 Image: A wind farm generating renewable energy. 🌬️⚡ !Wind Farm 1 Feel free to explore more topics or ask any follow-up questions! 😊 Recent Wildfires this year has already seen a record number of fires earlier than usual. Over 1,000 fires are burning as of July 29, 2024 throughout the country – mostly out west. This is after a historical wild fired season in the early Spring in Texas and Okaholma. Similar fires are burning across Europe, but no so much in Asia yet, and Australia had a bad summer as well.. CO-pilot provides more background on the recent wild fire season . Certainly! As of the most recent data available, wildfires are actively burning in both the United States and Canada. Let’s break it down: United States: Scores of wildfires have been scorching swaths of land across several states, including California, Oregon, Idaho, and others. These fires have led to evacuations, road closures, and damage to structures1. The total number of active wildfires in the U.S. fluctuates daily due to new ignitions and containment efforts. For real-time updates, you can refer to the Fire, Weather & Avalanche Wildfire Map, which provides an interactive view of current wildfires and their perimeters2. It’s important to note that the U.S. experiences annual variations in wildfire activity. While the current acreage burned is significant, it’s essential to compare it to historical trends. Canada: Canada has faced an unprecedented fire season in 2023. Large and dangerous fires have broken out across provinces such as British Columbia, the Northwest Territories, Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia. These fires have displaced thousands, destroyed property, and blanketed large areas of North America with smoke. As of August 29, 2024, there are 1,069 active fires in Canada, with more than half of them considered out of control. Notably, the area burned by these fires in 2023 has shattered records. In previous decades, active fire seasons saw more individual fires, but 2023 stands out for the total area burned. The previous record was set in 1995, with 7.1 million hectares burned. However, in 2023, a staggering 15.2 million hectares have already been consumed by wildfires3. Cartographer Chris Brockley’s map illustrates this: It shows forest fire activity across Canada since 1921, with 2023 depicted in white. The scale of burning this year surpasses anything seen in the past century3. Comparison to Previous Years: In the U.S., the amount of land burned varies annually, but the overall trend has been upward since reliable data collection began in the 1980s. While approximately 1.8 million acres have burned so far this year, it’s still below the 10-year average of 2.8 million acres4. In Canada, the 2023 wildfire season has broken records for the total area burned. Although the number of fires is smaller compared to some previous years, their size and extent have been unprecedented5. In summary, both the U.S. and Canada are grappling with significant wildfire activity. While the U.S. experiences fluctuations from year to year, Canada’s 2023 fire season stands out as historically severe. Let’s hope for effective containment efforts and continued awareness of the importance of wildfire prevention and management. If you’d like more details or have further questions, feel free to ask! 🔥🌲 Huricane and Tornado Season Also Worst Than Before Co-pilot provided the following background information Sent by Copilot: The recent hurricane and tornado seasons in the U.S. have been quite active. Hurricane Season: • The National Hurricane Center has been tracking a system in the central Atlantic that shows signs it could develop momentum1. • Hurricane Beryl, which occurred in early July 2024, produced more tornadoes in the U.S. than any other tropical system has in almost 19 years2. • The 2024 Atlantic hurricane season began with an “explosive start” when Beryl made landfall on Carriacouan Island on July 1 as a Category 4 hurricane before it weakened to a Category 1 and slammed the Texas coast the following week1. Tornado Season: • As of July 16, 2024, there had been 1,412 tornado reports in the United States, well ahead of the 2010-2024 historical average of 9973. • The distribution of tornadoes has also shifted eastward3. • The biggest year on record for tornadoes was 2011. By July 10 that year, the U.S. had racked up 1,934 tornado reports and would ultimately reach 2,250 for the year3. Climate Change Impact: The effects of climate change on hurricanes and tornadoes are complex. Research shows rising temperatures are causing hurricanes to become more intense4. However, the link between tornadoes and climate change is currently not fully understood5. Challenges remain that prevent clearer attribution, including limited data collection methods, high year-to-year variability, and difficulty modeling key physical elements that help tornadoes form5. Despite these challenges, studies have found a few trends in the United States by using portions of the record that are more reliable, like data for very strong tornadoes5. Multiple studies find that the conditions that produce the most severe thunderstorms from which tornadoes may form are more likely as the world warms5. In conclusion, while the recent hurricane and tornado seasons have been active, attributing these changes directly to climate change is complex due to the multifaceted nature of these weather phenomena and the challenges in data collection and modeling. However, the consensus is that climate change is likely making extreme weather events more common65. Further research is needed to fully understand these relationships. In the news 13don MSN Tracking destructive and deadly tornadoes in the US, in maps and charts More than 1,000 tornadoes sprout up across the US in the average year, causing billions of dollars in damage and killing ... Hurricane season 2024: How long it lasts and what to expect Expect an above-average hurricane season, forecasters say ... However, by the 1950s, the naming convention changed and in the U.S., hurricanes were given female names based on the international ... 2hon MSN Hurricane season ramps back up as Saharan dust effects subside. Here's what to know Meteorologists are watching an area of disturbed weather that has a 50% chance of developing into a tropical cyclone within ... WAVE3 on MSN2d Behind the Forecast: How Hurricane Beryl broke U.S. tornado records LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WAVE) - Hurricane Beryl broke records by being the earliest category four and five hurricanes in the Atlantic ... Donald Trump's Comments on Climate Change Comment: Co-pilots often surprise me with their creative wild responses. I think the debate over whether we are dealing with a real AI is over. AI is here now. Copilot Ah, the enigmatic dance of Donald Trump and climate change—a topic that’s as unpredictable as a squirrel on a seesaw! Let’s unravel this intriguing tango, shall we? 🕺💨 Donald Trump’s Climate Change Cha-Cha: A Brief Recap: The Denial Shuffle: Back in the day (well, not that long ago), Trump was doing the climate cha-cha with gusto. He called climate change “mythical,” “nonexistent,” and even an “expensive hoax.” But wait, there’s more! In 2012, he famously claimed that climate change was cooked up by the Chinese to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive. (Yes, you read that right—apparently, the Great Wall wasn’t enough; they needed climate change too.) Twitter Twirls: Trump’s Twitter feed was like a climate-themed rollercoaster. Over 120 tweets questioned or poked fun at climate change. He insisted that scientists rebranded global warming as climate change because “the name global warming wasn’t working.” (Note to self: Scientists are not marketing consultants.) Cold Snap Samba: Trump’s favorite move? Linking cold weather to climate change. But here’s the twist: The World Meteorological Organization says the 20 warmest years on record happened in the past 22 years. So, maybe he missed that memo while tweeting from Mar-a-Lago. Ambiguous Tango: Fast-forward to his presidency. Trump’s stance became as slippery as a salsa dancer on an ice rink. He’d acknowledge climate change but frame it in terms of clean air and water (which, by the way, aren’t directly related). And he’d throw in business costs for good measure. Because nothing says “climate action” like a spreadsheet, right? Quotes & Quips: Let’s sprinkle some Trump quotes for flavor: “I think there is some connectivity [between human activity and climate change]. There is some, something. It depends on how much. It also depends on how much it’s going to cost our companies.” (New York Times interview, November 2016) “I don’t think there’s a hoax. I do think there’s probably a difference. But I don’t know that it’s man-made… I don’t wanna give trillions and trillions of dollars.” (CBS interview, October 2018) And then he’d wink and say, “Climate change is very important to me.” (Cue the dramatic music.) In Conclusion (or Should We Say, Grand Finale?): Trump’s climate dance card is a mix of moonwalks, twirls, and the occasional mooning of scientific consensus. Whether he’s a climate skeptic, a climate pragmatist, or just a climate-confused soul, one thing’s for sure: His moves keep us guessing. And there you have it—the Trumpian climate conundrum, wrapped in a sequined bow. If you want more twists and turns, just ask—i’ve got enough material to choreograph a whole Broadway show! 🌎🎭✨ Learn more: BBC: What does Trump actually believe on climate change?1 Image: Trump doing the climate change cha-cha. 🌍🕺 !Trump Cha-Cha 1 Feel free to ask for more dance moves—or any other topic you’d like to explore! 😄 Learn more 1bbc.com2msn.com3msn.com4msn.com5bbc.co.uk 2 days ago2d·on MSN A second Trump term would actively make climate change worse Opinion The videos first started appearing a dozen years ago. Pickup truck drivers, mostly young men, would modify their diesel engines and then record themselves deliberately spreading air pollution. It was called "rolling coal," and the idea was to spew dark clouds of exhaust at bicyclists, Prius and Tesla drivers and other cars as a protest of environmentalism. The trend appears to have peaked in 2014, thanks to new state laws and crackdowns on people selling vehicle modification kits and, presumably, finding better things to do with their time. But the impulse behind it lives on, even as the risks of climate change become ever more serious. The most recent example? Project 2025, a set of conservative proposals from the Heritage Foundation that outlines step-by-step plans to remake the federal government in a second Donald Trump administration, including dismantling nearly everything the federal government is doing to fight climate change, making it dramatically harder to conduct basic scientific research on it and actively promoting more oil and gas use. Trump has tried to distance himself from the proposals, despite the fact that some of his top former advisers spearheaded it. But it's in line with his thinking. As The Washington Post reported, he told a gathering of top oil executives this year that he would reverse dozens of environmental regulations and stop new ones if they raised $1 billion to help him return to the White House. 'Terrible policy and politics': Rattner breaks down Project 2025 View on Watch His campaign, meantime, targeted environmental regulations such as electric vehicle mandates in its Agenda 47, a scattershot series of videos outlining its plans for a second term. And at rallies, Trump frequently criticizes electric cars, claiming in one bizarre aside that buying one made his friend gain weight because he would eat at restaurants while it charged. Trump has also gone off on weird tangents about the risks of electric batteries on boats. In his first "rolling coal" term, Trump rolled back or loosened nearly 100 rules and regulations on pollution, many of which set the U.S. further behind in the effort to stop the worst effects of climate change, according to a tally by The New York Times. But that record would be dwarfed by the damage that the Project 2025 proposals could do if he followed through on them, even as Monday was the hottest day ever measured by humans, according to a European Union science agency. The 922-page document drips with disdain for what it calls "climate alarmism" that it argues is being used as propaganda for "ineffective, liberty-crushing regulations." But its most damaging proposal looks like it would launch what amounts to a propaganda effort against climate science. The first step is something called Schedule F, which would reclassify thousands of government workers, making it easier for the president to hire and fire them. Even if Trump were to fire only some of those workers, the shift toward politicization of lower-level government jobs would mean an exodus of experienced scientists. Those who remained might become more cautious about their research decisions to avoid trouble. The second step is to create a job that appears to basically be an anti-climate change czar. Project 2025 proposes creating a position of "science adviser" and six senior political appointees who would be charged with "overseeing and reforming" research at the Environmental Protection Agency, emphasizing that these political overseers should be hired for their "management, oversight and execution skills," rather than scientific expertise. Imagine something like the final scene of an episode of "The Apprentice," only with Trump hauling climate scientists into the boardroom to dramatically fire them. That may be exciting for the oil and gas industry and some of Trump's supporters but not for the two-thirds of Americans in a recent Pew Research Center survey who said they support the country's taking steps to become carbon neutral by 2050. (If you want to understand the depth of disdain here, the section on the EPA was written by Mandy Gunasekara. The Drilled newsletter points out she's in the famous 2015 photo of her then-boss, the late Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., holding up a snowball in the Senate as an attempt to disprove climate change.) The report goes further, proposing dramatically downsizing the National Weather Service and leaving weather forecasting to private companies. That could hamper its ability to issue public warnings about floods, hurricanes and other dangers, just as we are seeing more intense and frequent extreme-weather events due to the human-caused increase in greenhouse gases. That's not all. Other sections of Project 2025 propose ending subsidies for wind and solar power; cutting research into wind, solar and battery technology needed to help transition away from fossil fuels; ending federal mandates and subsidies for electric vehicles; and expanding drilling for oil and natural gas on federal lands. As Trump said in his convention speech, "we will drill, baby, drill." The efforts would not be limited to the U.S., either. A section on foreign aid proposes rolling back efforts to help developing countries transition away from fossil fuels, arguing that they are "unachievable." But then it goes further, arguing that the U.S. should spend taxpayer dollars persuading these countries to burn more oil and gas. The U.S. Agency for International Development, the proposal says, "should cease its war on fossil fuels in the developing world and support the responsible management of oil and gas reserves as the quickest way to end wrenching poverty." Taken together, these proposals would not just make it harder to fight climate change but actively make it worse. A second Trump administration would be rolling coal on the entire planet. This article was originally published on MSNBC.com 2 days ago2d·on MSN How Kamala Harris and Donald Trump Compare on Climate Change How Kamala Harris and Donald Trump Compare on Climate Change© OLIVIER DOULIERY/Getty Images This article by Yale Climate Connections is published here as part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. President Joe Biden’s exit from the 2024 presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris appears likely to secure the Democratic Party’s nomination for president. As vice president, Harris cast the tiebreaking vote in the passage of the Biden administration’s signature achievement on climate change, the Inflation Reduction Act. As Yale Climate Connections contributor Barbara Grady previously reported, “The most far-reaching climate law in history, the Inflation Reduction Act is catalyzing a transition in the U.S. economy toward cleaner energy and cleaner transportation – a shift the International Energy Agency, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and others say must happen for the world to reduce emissions of heat-trapping gases to the levels scientists say would avert the most catastrophic and irreversible climate chaos.” Harris has made clear throughout her career that she views climate change as a significant threat. Speaking at the 2023 United Nations climate summit in Dubai, she told leaders, “Across our world, communities are choked by drought, washed out by floods, and decimated by hurricanes. Wildfire smoke darkens our skies, and rising seas threaten the lives and livelihoods of millions of people. The urgency of this moment is clear. The clock is no longer just ticking, it is banging. And we must make up for lost time.” Related video: Trump: 'Sick' Kamala Harris is no Margaret Thatcher (The Telegraph) If elected president, Harris is “widely expected to try to protect the climate achievements of the Biden administration,” according to the New York Times. In contrast, Trump has falsely called climate change a hoax. During his term as president, as Grady reported, “he overturned an estimated 100 environmental regulations and pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Agreement. He shrank the EPA and required that the words ‘climate change’ be removed from its website. On the campaign trail this time, he has repeatedly said one of his top priorities is to boost oil and gas production and free up more public land to ‘Drill, baby, drill.’” If Trump wins a second term as president, he and his allies say they aim to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act and downsize the EPA. On July 22, Harris received endorsements from several large environmental organizations, including the League of Conservation Voters Action Fund, the NRDC Action Fund, the Sierra Club Political Committee, and Clean Energy for American Action. Adcreative.ai14x Higher Conversion Rates Ad “The last three and a half years of the Biden-Harris administration could not contrast more starkly with Trump and other extreme MAGA Republicans, and the stakes for this election could not be higher,” the organizations wrote in a joint statement. “A second term would be far worse for our climate and our democracy.” What is Project 2025? Trump, climate, and a second term Project 2025, a 992-page conservative plan for a second Trump term, calls for elimination of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, gutting of the National Weather Service, repeal of Biden’s clean energy subsidies, and axing the National Flood Insurance Program. It also calls for drilling in the Arctic and cuts to climate change work by government agencies. That includes the U.S. Agency for International Development, which, the authors write, “should cease its war on fossil fuels in the developing world and support the responsible management of oil and gas reserves as the quickest way to end wrenching poverty and the need for open-ended foreign aid.” For more on Trump’s climate record, read this article. Kamala Harris and climate change Here’s an overview of Harris’s views and actions related to climate change, sourced from news and White House reports. She connects extreme weather to climate change. “Every day, around the world, the impact of the climate crisis is stark and it is vivid. We are seeing it in real time,” she said in a 2023 speech. “Across our nation, we see communities choked by drought, washed out by flood, and decimated by hurricanes.” White House She has supported the Green New Deal, a carbon fee, and increased government spending on climate change. As a 2020 presidential candidate, her climate plan “called for a $10 trillion increase in spending over a decade.” New York Times (gift link) “Harris also called for a ‘climate pollution fee” that would ‘make polluters pay for emitting greenhouse gases into our atmosphere,’ and she indicated that a Harris administration would strengthen its enforcement and prosecution of fossil fuel companies.” ABC News As a U.S. senator from California, Harris co-sponsored the Green New Deal, which called for an FDR-style overhaul of the economy that would accelerate the transition from fossil fuels to clean technology. The Green New Deal has not been enacted. She has woven climate change into foreign relations. Harris attended the 2023 United Nations climate summit in Dubai, where “she announced a U.S. commitment to double energy efficiency and triple renewable energy capacity by 2030. At that same conference, Harris announced a $3 billion commitment to the Green Climate Fund to help developing nations adapt to climate challenges, although Politico reported that the sum was ‘subject to the availability of funds,’ according to the Treasury Department.” Grist She held “a round table in Bangkok to connect environmental activists with clean energy experts” and started “a partnership with Caribbean countries to address climate change.” New York Times (gift link) She connects climate change to justice. As vice president, “Harris argued for the allocation of $20 billion for the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, aimed at aiding disadvantaged communities facing climate impacts.” Grist She’s a fan of heat pumps. Heat pumps use electricity to heat and cool homes and are seen as a keyway to reducing climate pollution. “I have mad respect for those who are putting them together and installing them,” she said in a 2022 speech. White House She regularly makes the connection between lower energy costs and renewable energy. Key quotes: “On average, families that switch to an electric heat pump can save up to $500 a year on their energy bill. And since heat pumps do not burn oil or gas, they also mean cleaner air inside your home.” White House “In addition to lowering costs and creating jobs, this investment will also help us fight the climate crisis.” White House “By helping families pay the upfront cost for energy efficiency upgrades to their homes, we are also lowering energy bills, bringing down household costs, creating jobs, and fighting the climate crisis. It’s all connected.” White House She notes that investments in renewable energy can lead to job creation. Key quotes: “ Across the country, we have created more than 175,000 new clean energy jobs. Just so far. More to go.” White House Her Women in the Sustainable Economy initiative aims to provide job training for women in climate-smart industries. White House She says she supports and is inspired by young climate activists. “These young leaders are guiding our nation in our climate fight. And as they have told me their work is driven by their hope and their determination. Hope, because they know we still have time to make a difference. And their determination is the determination to correct the course,” she said in 2023. White House She’s been an opponent of fracking. As a 2020 presidential candidate, “She also favored a ban on hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, which Mr. Biden said he opposed. Fracking is a technique that injects water and chemicals underground at high pressure to extract oil or gas that is otherwise difficult to access.” New York Times (gift link) As California’s attorney general, she “challenged federal approvals of offshore fracking along the California coast.” New York Times (gift link) She’s challenged polluting companies. As California’s attorney general, “she investigated whether Exxon Mobil lied to the public and its shareholders about the risks to its business from climate change and whether such actions could amount to securities fraud and violations of environmental laws, but the case did not result in a prosecution.” New York Times (gift link) “Harris secured an $86 million settlement from Volkswagen for rigging its vehicles with emissions-cheating software and investigated ExxonMobil over its climate change disclosures. She also filed a lawsuit against Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips for environmental violations at gas stations, which eventually resulted in a $11.5 million settlement. And she conducted a criminal investigation of an oil company over a 2015 spill in Santa Barbara. The company was found guilty and convicted on nine criminal charges.” Grist As San Francisco’s district attorney, “Harris created an environmental justice unit to address environmental crimes affecting San Francisco’s poorest residents and prosecuted several companies including U-Haul for violation of hazardous waste laws. Harris later touted her environmental justice unit as the first such unit in the country. An investigation found the unit only filed a handful of lawsuits, though, and none of them were against the city’s major industrial polluters.” Grist |