Dialogue with my muse |
JOE: Good morning Calliope. CALLIOPE: Good morning Joe. You had more to say about marriage? JOE: I did. It seems to me that the word itself is confusing the debate about who should be allowed to use the word "married." CALLIOPE: How so? JOE: Most people don't object to other than heterosexual couples having civil unions. They just object to calling it marriage. CALLIOPE: I see. Civilly, Marriage refers to a legal union regardless of whether there is a religious ceremony. JOE: Right. It also refers to a religious ceremony, regardless of whether it is legalized with the government. CALLIOPE: So you can be married in the eyes of the government alone, a church alone or both. JOE: Right. I think it's too much work for one word to do. CALLIOPE: What would you call it then? JOE: Good question. Reserving the word for people in one set of circumstances is likely to alienate everyone else. Maybe we need several words to make everyone's situation clear. CALLIOPE: Is anybody even discussing this possibility? JOE: Not that I know of. That's why I brought it up. CALLIOPE: Do you think anyone else is interested in the issue? JOE: Perhaps William Safire would be. I'll ask him. I'm not sure anyone else has the emotional energy to enter into such a debate. We shall see. Talk with you tomorrow. |