Exploring the future through the present. One day at a time. |
There are three advantages to not having published (traditionally) a single book: 1. No expectations. By others, that is. I don’t have to worry about my words offending or pleasing anyone. 2. No deadlines. If I don’t feel like writing one day (or year), I don’t have to. Unless, of course, my muse starts pounding on the back of my head to get to it. 3. No need to brainstorm ideas. Once a writer signs a contract with a publisher, it’s usually for multiple books, and the writer is expected to churn out about one book a year. Writing my first book was a dream. I spent a mere three months pounding out 103k words. The sequel I wrote a year later, and it took me only six months to write 130k words.”The Red Dagger” took a month to write 2/3 of it since it was my first national novel writing month effort. I then spent another three months finishing it. All three came to me with a flash of insight, so it felt more like dictation than actual writing. Since then I’ve tried writing three other novels. None are finished. I can’t seem to bring out the passion to write them as I did my first three. Where are those flashes of insight? Or are they there, but buried deep within a pile of too-high expectations? So thinking ahead, how can I meet the possible requirements of a publisher with one book a year? Believe it or not, I think I can do it. Sometimes I merely need an outside source to push me to complete a project. Coming up with a good idea, however, proves to be the biggest challenge. Writing it comes in a close second. For that reason alone, I admire authors who can continuously write one novel a year, and see a good portion of them succeed. I’d love to be one of those. |