My primary Writing.com blog. |
Logocentric (adj). Regarding words and language as a fundamental expression of an external reality (especially applied as a negative term to traditional Western thought by postmodernist critics). Sometimes I just write whatever I feel like. Other times I respond to prompts, many taken from the following places: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks for stopping by! ![]() |
Prompt #43: Have you ever wanted to be the boss at a place you've worked? What aspects of being a boss are appealing? Do you think you'd actually be good at it? I actually think I'd be really good at being a boss. I know a lot of people think that they'd be a good boss, but that often comes from a place of wanting the perks of being a boss without an understanding or appreciation of what's actually involved in the job. I've actually been a boss before on a small scale, so I have a bit of an understanding of what's involved. I'm not sure I'd want to be the boss at the place I currently work (leading a massive, publicly-traded company seems like a huge headache ![]() There are three aspects of being a boss that I think I do well. First, I think I'm good at synthesizing information and making informed choices. I'll never be the guy who's a brilliant lawyer, or a finance whiz, or has all of the HR policies memorized... but I do know a little bit about all of those areas, and quite a few others. And I'm confident in my ability to see the bigger picture, so I actually think I would be really good heading up a company where I'm faced with a challenge, given input from Finance, Legal, HR, Operations, etc. and then making the best decision about how to proceed. Second, I'm a pretty good-natured person who's not afraid of making tough decisions. While I definitely want everyone to like me and while I'm generally well-liked, I also know that not every decision a boss makes is popular, but I think I'm an affable enough personality that I can make difficult decisions while still maintaining support from the company as a whole. I've never had to put that to the test on a large scale (i.e., beyond a few employees here and there), but I have a feeling I'd be able to, for example, find a way to be encouraging and shore up morale even in the face of difficult decisions like layoffs or other austerity measure. Third, kind of going along with the second one, I've been in the position of the rank-and-file worker for over twenty years now. I've worked at both good and bad companies, and have had both great and terrible bosses myself. I think, if nothing else, I would be able to approach my leadership responsibilities with the perspective of the people who work for me in mind most of the time. One of the biggest issues I see with leadership in a corporate setting these days is a real disconnection from those outside the ranks of leadership, and it would be important to me to maintain a sense of grounded perspective as I made decisions that affect the entire company. Overall, I think I would be a good boss. At least in terms of managing people and internal decision making. That said, there's a lot of other things that go into being a good leader, including things like vision, execution, crisis management, market positioning, etc. and I suppose I won't really know how I'd do with those things until I get to that bridge and have to cross it. ![]() |