![]() |
Drop your new ideas into the Writing.Com Suggestion Box! |
There is still the problem of who would be responsible for making sure that the "correct" answer is actually correct, and who would handle disputes over what the correct answer is. Referring to a style guide, which was suggested earlier as a solution, does not preclude varying opinions about which rule in that style guide is the correct one to apply. Creating appropriate examples and appropriate test questions is very difficult. In the given examples -- ![]() ![]() E could also be correct. When the independent clauses are closely related and very short, using a comma is optional. ![]() ![]() ![]() E is correctly punctuated for situations where the appositive is nonrestrictive. A is correctly punctuated for situations where the appositive is restrictive -- there is more than one Sam in the group of people being referred to. #6 illustrates the problem English has with ambiguity: B is also a correctly punctuated sentence - it uses Sam as a noun of address and who (with the sense of whoever) as the subject, and it has the sense of explaining an assignment of duties to a particular person. I also think examples teach better when there is more everyday logic to the content than can be provided by randomly filling blanks from a preset list. ![]() In my opinion, this type of educational project would be a better fit as a quiz (with a quiz bank) in a member's port, where the expectation of accuracy is not so burdensome and the item owner is the designated referee/authority/maintainer, or done as member-generated bots as SM suggested in "Re: Grammar Bot Idea" ![]() Trying to create appropriate examples and/or test questions, while difficult, is a good writing exercise. A group activity to create a quiz bank is something people of many ability levels could participate in. Best, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ~~Image #6000 Sharing Restricted~~ ~~Image #603504 Sharing Restricted~~ |