The New Yorker [E] About the accredited subscription that is a very dense read. |
A "Game of Thrones" review from The views and opinions on this review are mainly the things discovered by the reader and therefore, do not reflect necessarily to the group, activity and/or event being affiliated herein. This is only the opinion and suggestions of the reviewer and it is still up to the author of this piece to consider this review as a corrective action or otherwise. Hello Roselia I agree that The New Yorker is written with the intention to either make readers better, or to confuse. A lot of the articles in that publication use the most obtuse words that may be the most correct one, but definitely not the most used or easiest understood. The New Yorkers revels in keeping a division between itself and its readers in through this "us versus them" way of writing. Those who can easily grasp all of the texts in the magazine can feel very self-important. Although they are usually staying within their own circles, talking in circles too. I have a friend whose father challenged her to always use the highest Lexile level words when speaking. After being present during one of their interactions, I complained that the way they speak is incomprehensible to me. She admitted that half the time she's not sure what he goes on about and just humors him because she didn't want to admit not actually understanding him. Here are a couple of suggestions on correcting your text: a good read..I am not Only one period needed and then an empty space before "I". WHew Whew (keep the "h" lowercase in the middle of the word) My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
|