A "Game of Thrones" review from The views and opinions on this review are mainly the things discovered by the reader and therefore, do not reflect necessarily to the group, activity and/or event being affiliated herein. This is only the opinion and suggestions of the reviewer and it is still up to the author of this piece to consider this review as a corrective action or otherwise. Hello dragonwoman This starts out very promising with a special mix of Holmes and Watson. Now I have to find out whether Sherlock is the doctor or the smart one or vice versa. Very clever way to create interest for your story. Undoubtably You should research this word. Depending on which dictionary you look at, you will see that this word is not a "real" word. Or that you used it in the wrong way here. “Undoubtedly” indicates that the speaker has no doubt about what is being said. “Indubitably” indicates that doubt about what is being said is impossible. I underlined the letters in each version of the word to make it easier to see how they are different. “Anyone can say they saw nothing, but can they prove it?” This just blew my mind. It is so true that it is impossible to prove that nothing was seen. Because there was nobody there when nothing was seen to witness the nothingness. I think that the people in the group who claim that they didn't see anything are liars. The whole lot of them was able to pretend to be visually impaired during Dr. Holmes's examination, but when they all started talking at once, all it took was for Dr. Holmes to hold up a hand. Hold. Up. A. Hand. He didn't say anything. He didn't give them any auditory or other indication that they were to be quiet. This means, they did see something, but they all conspired to not having seen anything. Clearly, these people are going to have a very hard time proving that all of them who were there didn't see nothing. My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
|