The Name’s Daisy [13+] A defense attorney’s adventure |
Hello Amethyst ❄️ Angel! You are receiving this review of "The Name’s Daisy" in connection with "Game of Thrones" . Areas of Strength Your story's opening hook was attention-grabbing and effective in setting the tone. The use of dialogue immediately established a sense of urgency and intrigue. It immediately pulled me into the story and created a compelling opening scene—accusations of murder tend to have that effect! The use of first-person narration helped immerse me in your story, allowing me to experience the world through Daisy's eyes. This personalization of the narrative made the action more engaging for me and fits this type of story very well. Daisy is well-developed with a distinct voice and personality. Her profession as a criminal defense attorney added depth and drives the plot forward. Her dedication to her job was evident and established her as a strong, determined character who was willing to fight for justice. Daisy's interactions with other characters—such as her confrontation with Detective Stewart—showcased her assertiveness and willingness to stand up for what she believes in, adding layers to her character. The murder mystery plot was well-executed. It had twists and turns and kept me guessing. The gradual unraveling of the clues made me feel engaged with the action as it was happening and heightened the suspense and mystery. The resolution of the mystery was satisfying, with Daisy successfully uncovering the truth and confronting the real murderer. Your dialogue was realistic and helped to reveal characters personalities and motivations. It was also effective in driving the plot forward and building tension. Daisy's interactions with Eliza and Detective Stewart were characterized by sharp, snappy dialogue that reflected her assertive nature. dialogue serves to The confrontation between Daisy and Bill in the bedroom was tense and gripping and elevated the feeling of suspense in the scene. Well executed! Areas for Improvement Some of the supporting characters could benefit from more depth and complexity. For example, Eliza comes across as one-dimensional in her main role as being the damsel in distress. You might consider adding more backstory and depth to your supporting characters. For Eliza, you could explore her relationship with her husband and her motives for potentially wanting him dead. This would make her character more nuanced and interesting. There are moments where your story feels a bit rushed, particularly in the resolution of the mystery. Daisy quickly deduces Bill's guilt based on a single piece of evidence—Bob's journal— which felt a bit too convenient and unimaginative. You could slow down the resolution of the mystery by adding more clues and red herrings along the way. This would make Daisy's deduction process more realistic and engaging. There are instances where the dialogue tags and attributions are repetitive or unnecessary which distracted me from the flow of the dialogue. For example: "I didn't kill Bob!" she cried out The tag she cried out is somewhat redundant because your dialogue and the exclamation point itself already convey that emotion. Use dialogue tags and attributions sparingly and only when necessary to clarify who is speaking or how they are speaking. Most of the time, if you need a dialogue tag with an attribution it can solved with better dialogue. I'd recommend taking a look at your dialogue and seeing if there are ways in which it can be reworked, reworded, or made sharper to enhance and convey the attribution without needed to tell the reader how the character feels or is choosing to express their words. To avoid the reveal of Bill being the real murderer feeling like it comes out of nowhere, there could be more foreshadowing throughout the story to hint at his guilt and motive. I'd suggest dropping subtle clues and hints earlier in your story that suggest Bill's involvement. You could include moments where Bill behaves suspiciously or where Daisy notices inconsistencies in his story or his body language seems off. It doesn't need to be melodramatic so you can maintain the element of surprise. It should be simple things briefly mentioned in passing but when the reader looks back they can pull those threads together and see the bigger tapestry. The conflict between Daisy and Detective Stewart was resolved somewhat abruptly for me. Stewart suddenly admitting that he was wrong about Eliza's guilt felt a bit too neat and could be more convincingly resolved. You could include a scene where they have a more nuanced conversation about their differing perspectives. Overall Impression Your story is a compelling mystery with a strong protagonist and a well-crafted plot. Daisy is well-developed with her determination and intelligence shining through in her pursuit of the truth. The mystery is engaging with enough twists and turns to keep readers guessing until the end. The setting and atmosphere were effectively conveyed and added to the overall sense of intrigue and suspense. Supporting characters, particularly Eliza, could benefit from more depth and complexity to make them more engaging. The pacing, while generally good, could be smoothed out in certain areas to make the resolution of the mystery feel more natural and less rushed. Some of the dialogue tags and attributions could be tightened up to improve the flow of the dialogue. Lastly, more foreshadowing could be added throughout the story to hint at the eventual resolution of the mystery, making it feel more satisfying and less abrupt. This has all the great features as a murder mystery story. With some tweaks and adjustments, it can become an even more compelling read. Keep honing your craft and you'll continue to grow as a writer. Your ability to create a gripping mystery is evident, and with continued practice, you'll no doubt continue to captivate readers with your strong storytelling skills. Write on, Angel! Let your imagination run wild. Set your creativity free. We are the Free Folk. And we do not kneel. DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed within this review are the sole product of the reviewer. They do not necessarily reflect those of the group, activity and/or event in which they are affiliated. Any implementation of suggested edits is at the sole discretion of the piece's writer; they may be used when and where deemed necessary by the writer of the piece and/or disregarded in their entirety. The reviewer releases any and all rights and/or claims to those suggestive edits should they be utilized by the writer of the piece. My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!" .
|