Short Stories
This week: Conspiracy Theory Edited by: Shannon More Newsletters By This Editor
1. About this Newsletter 2. A Word from our Sponsor 3. Letter from the Editor 4. Editor's Picks 5. A Word from Writing.Com 6. Ask & Answer 7. Removal instructions
Welcome to the Short Stories Newsletter. I am Shannon and I'm your editor this week. |
ASIN: 0997970618 |
|
Amazon's Price: $ 14.99
|
|
In general, I'm not what you would call a Jesse Ventura fan, but lately I've been watching his show Conspiracy Theory. and find it compelling, to say the least. What is the story behind (and below) the Denver airport? Was Lee Harvey Oswald a Manchurian Candidate? Is the United States government working alongside extraterrestrials inside Area 51? And just what the bloody hell is going on on Plum Island? I mean, have you seen the Montauk Monster? Yeah, raccoon my ruddy rear end.
That got me thinking. Wasn't Mel Gibson in a movie about this stuff back in the 90s? I think it was even called Conspiracy Theory, if I remember right.
I Googled the term "Conspiracy Theory" and was rewarded with a plethora of results: Wikipedia's list of conspiracy theories page, Ventura's show on truTV, Mel Gibson's 1997 movie ... the possibilities were endless. The Illuminiti, Area 51, JFK, the New World Order, 9/11, Oliver Stone as a disinformation junkie for George Bush senior. I was like a kid in a candy store. I logged on to my Netflix account. The Gibson movie was available, but not instantly viewable. Damn! On a whim I navigated to YouTube. Voilà! There it was in fourteen 9:50-minute increments. Let's do this!
"A good conspiracy is an unprovable one. I mean, if you can prove it, it means they screwed up somewhere along the line." ~ Jerry Fletcher, Mel Gibson's character in Conspiracy Theory
Yeah, baby. That's what I'm talking about! Jerry is an intriguing character. Whether you believe him or not, he's still interesting, and you like him immediately. Are his theories spot-on? Is he mentally ill? Now, this question opens up a whole new world of possibility. I mean, have you flipped through the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)? Again, the possibilities are endless, but let's assume Jerry is not crazy. What does this mean? Is what he says possible? Better yet, is what he says absolutely impossible? Once we establish that what he says is not outside the realm of possibility, things get a whole lot scarier.
"That's what they start when you're young, you know. When you're little in school they Baden-Powell all the boys and they, they Betty Crocker all the girls, and then they air condition ya and put you in an Easy Bake Oven until you can't breathe anymore." ~ Jerry Fletcher, Mel Gibson's character in Conspiracy Theory
I was practically salivating, literally giddy with excitement. Characters and plot summaries flooded my brain, and I wrote each one of them down as fast as I could. Funny how watching a mediocre television show can lead to so many different story ideas, isn't it?
Find something you're interested in, read about it (or watch it), and let your mind wander. You may be surprised by where you end up.
|
Before we get to this week's recommended reading, did you know the Quill Awards nomination deadline is fast approaching? Yep, you only have until 11:59 pm WDC time on Sunday 16 January 2011, so if you read something you LOVED this year, give it the recognition it deserves and nominate that sucker here!
Now, on to this week's featured stories.
| | The Changeling (13+) A young man spends his Christmas Birthday struggling with life, death, sanity, and freedom #1226741 by Basilides |
| | For the Future (13+) Sometimes, for the good of the future, one person must pay the ultimate price. #973498 by Elerad |
| | Invalid Item This item number is not valid. #1548183 by Not Available. |
| | Invalid Item This item number is not valid. #1462120 by Not Available. |
| | Gun Man (18+) He has no name. He has no fingerprints. He has no morals. He has no mercy. #1681761 by Axel |
In last month's edition I challenged readers to evaluate whether or not they achieved their 2010 New Year's resolutions:
Those of you who entered last year's "Dear Me: Official WDC Contest" [E] ... how did you make out? Did you come close? Send me the link to your 2010 "Dear Me" letter and write me a 1000-word essay (essay can not exceed 1000 words or it will be disqualified) detailing how you either met or fell short of your expectations. The one I like best will receive a Success MB + 50k GPs. Winner will be announced in my next Short Stories Newsletter on December 7. Good luck!
To everyone who rose to the challenge, thank you! I appreciate your time and effort, and I enjoyed reading each and every entry, but there can be but one winner. So without further ado, please join me in congratulating the winner:
Looking Back
Who is good at keeping New Year's resolutions? Anybody? Anyone? I didn't think so. The old proverb says, "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." When it comes to New Year's resolutions I think most of those intentions are forgotten before the hangover subsides. Perhaps knowing this, Writing Dot Com encourages us write them down and post them up for the world to see in the form of a Dear Me letter. This could be either to humiliate us later when we fail miserably, or because we are writers, take your pick. Whatever the reason, this provides us the opportunity towards the end of the year to dust the list off and see how we've done. This morning I was asked to do just that. I cringed.
Maybe a little background will shed some light on why I found this request so painful. At this time last year I was immersed in the craziness known as NaNowrimo or National Novel Writing Month. I wrote over fifty thousand words in just a month. I let loose, ignoring my inner editor and wrote more on one project than I had ever written before. I was stoked! My confidence was soaring through the roof! But, I was burnt out. Holding down a fulltime job and cranking out 1667 words a night during the holiday season had taken their toll. I thought I just needed a little break.
I took the month of December and most of January off citing the holiday distractions and burnout as excuses. In the last two weeks of January I managed a short eight hundred and sixty five word tale to win that weeks round of The Weekly Quickie and, of course, my aforementioned Dear Me letter. By now you are probably thinking 'that's not too bad, a month and a half off, and it was over the holidays.' Uh huh ... except I didn't write again until July 21st.
It was this I was thinking of this morning when I looked at Shannon's Short Stories NL challenge and cringed. I went back and re-read my Dear Me letter, peeked at my Portfolio, and low and behold, the sun crept from behind the clouds. Maybe my dear friend Giselle saved me by taking over The Weekly Quickie contest, or maybe it was just time. Either way I entered round one of her reign on July 21st and it was like the dam broke. I've wrote fifteen short stories since then. Most have been for The Weekly Quickie, short and sexy, but there have been a few longer pieces mixed in there including a 2nd place entry in The Paradise Cove and an entry to the October Short Shots Contest.
Taking a good look at the goals outlined in " Dear Slacker...err...Me," [ 13+], this is what I found.
1) I will clear the mental hurdle of the novel and complete one, even if it is only for my satisfaction.
I completed revision on my novelette His Pet, posting up the final thirteen chapters of the tale and making at least one reader, who had been waiting patiently for two and a half years, very happy. I also worked sporadically on my WIP Club Justice that sits at just under twenty thousand words to date.
2) I will enter at least eight contests on the WDC site.
To date I've entered eighteen. Of those eighteen I've placed or rated an honorable mention in twelve, with two others still open for judging.
3) I will submit at least eight items for publication off site.
I've submitted six so far. Three have been accepted for publication in anthologies and three are pending.
4) By the end of the year I will be able to show at least one of my works off in print, or a sheaf of rejection letters telling me what I must improve.
Today I held the anthology, Something from the Attic, in my hands for the first time. Inside its beautiful covers is my short story, "Muse." I can honestly say I am a published author.
When I cringed this morning I thought 2010 was a bit of a disappointment on the writing front, with the exception of my three short stories, none of which were wrote this year, being accepted for print. Doing research for this contest has really opened my eyes and I am amazed at what I have accomplished in what amounts to less than four months. This challenge has encouraged and inspired me. Once again it highlights the finer things about our community.
Thank you.
~WC~ 763
Thank YOU Mara. YOU are an inspiration, and an excellent reminder of what each and every one of us is capable of if we just set our mind to something. You are also an excellent example of the wonderful community made up of amazing individuals that we share here on WDC. Merry Christmas, my friend. And congratulations!
And congratulations to Lornda! Her entry was runner up and received an honorable mention 10k ribbon.
| | Invalid Item This item number is not valid. #1730659 by Not Available. | |
Have an opinion on what you've read here today? Then send the Editor feedback! Find an item that you think would be perfect for showcasing here? Submit it for consideration in the newsletter! https://www.Writing.Com/go/nl_form
Don't forget to support our sponsor!
ASIN: B083RZ37SZ |
|
Amazon's Price: Price N/A
Not currently available. |
|
Feedback
The following is in response to "Short Stories Newsletter (November 9, 2010)" :
billwilcox says, "It's amazing to me the number of people that want a good edit. But, please don't ask me. I've got more than I can handle with my own stuff. Besides, I can be brutally honest when forced to review a story I don't want to read. As far as self-publishing ... I think you are spot-on. If it's good and you shop it around, then someone else will think it's good too and you will actually get paid for the hardwork you put into the story rather than to pay someone to publish a genuine piece of crap you'll be embarrassed to show after a couple of years. I'm just saying. I just don't believe you should pay to be published. Call me crazy, but I always thought it was the other way around." Thanks for the feedback, Bill! And thanks for your continued support and encouragement.
LJPC - the tortoise says, "Hi Shannon! I've read many badly written things which are self-published. I believe you're right; if the author had the goal of being accepted by a real publisher, the standard would have to be far higher. I'm quite surprised you offered to give this person a review of their whole book. I would have simply pointed out that there are many sites and groups which can help a writer improve. I know people who refuse to go to sites (like ours) and instead rely on beta-readers (like their mothers). You're awfully nice to help her, but you may not get the appreciation you deserve. Lessons are better learned if the student has to work at improving. 'Free' lessons are often taken less seriously. She'd learn a lot more if she joined a group and had to critique others as well as revise. Those are my two cents. I'll stop yapping now." Oh, you can yap at me any ol' time.
atwhatcost says, "You have the same reservations about self-publishing I have. Now I'm wondering, even if Brandi makes her book better, can she get it published? Did self-publishing mess with the first-rights' issue?" Ooh, excellent question, Lynn! My gut says yes, but maybe someone else out there with more experience would like to weigh in. Anyone?
mARi☠StressedAtWork says, "Wonderful Newsletter!! It's nice that you could be honest and critic so well ... I wish I could!! But I'm sure I'll learn a lot along the way, especially here (WDC)!! Thanks for sharing this Newsletter and your experience with us. " Thank you! I'm glad you liked the NL.
shaara says, "That was an interesting story about reading someone's self-published work. You were very brave, but more importantly, you GAVE so much time of yourself. I'm finding that the more TIME I give, the less time I have to work on my own projects. Sigh. (I'm even thinking about New Year's Resolutions again, curbing my volunteerism.) But,honestly, anytime you're volunteering to do free editing, I'm sure you will find people knocking at your door. (May I be first in line with my eighteeen novels? LOL) Nice article, however. It painted me green with jealous (for the self-published author who got your attention.)" I have found that editing someone else's work improves my own writing, and I enjoy doing it. Eighteen novels? Wow, that would take a while.
Mara ♣ McBain says, "Awesome NL and major kudos to you for helping out a fellow writer. I confess that the technical aspects of writing make my head spin. I love to tell a story, but commas and their pesky cousin the apostrophe escape me time after time. A fresh set of eyes is PRICELESS!!" So true! I can proofread a story fifty times and still miss something someone else can see at a glance.
Than Pence says, "Ah, yes, the age-old question. 'What do you think of my story?' You're a good person to provide so much detailed assistance. I've been asked this in the past and I find that a writer always wants to hear the truth, even if it's hard to both hear and say. Of course, when I ask people the same question, I'm always fixed with anxiousness. Do I want to hear that my story is good or that it needs work? And will they tell me the truth, or what they think I want to hear? It's a tricky game to play, but it's a little easier here on WDC: we don't know each other personally, just through our writings. That's one reason why I love the site so much." YES! It's a little touchier when you know the person personally (or work with their sister). lol
Zeke says, "I agree that self-publishing is cheating, but sometimes it's just a matter of personal ego." Thank you for the feedback, Zeke! And thank you for reading.
J. A. Buxton says, "I enjoyed your article about self publishing. I decided to go that route for my books since I'm thin skinned and too old to face rejection. The first novel, Home of the Red Fox was professionally edited, and I blush to tell you her favorite word also was 'Ugh!' Of course her favorite writer is Ernest Hemingway, while mine is Catherine Coulter. Worlds apart in style, wouldn't you agree? What I've found even more helpful in my two novels are the critiques by WDC members. They caught typo errors and plot holes galore. They also encouraged me to keep writing, even when I doubted my writing skills. I agree that some self-published books might be sloppy, but I bet none by WDC members fall into that category." I agree with you about WDC and its members. My writing has improved a thousandfold since joining in 2006. And I'm not completely 100% anti-self-publishing. I have read some AMAZING self-published work--novels that are just as good (if not better) than some traditionally published stuff, but I've found this to be the exception rather than the rule.
scribbler says, "I totally understand the cringe you did internally. I hate when people ask me to read their work because I am trained as an editor. I'm honest because in the end that's what will help them, but honestly some people don't want to hear that. They only want to hear they are 'good'." Boy, isn't that the truth. I know it was true for me personally when I was a fledgling writer, but as you mature you realize the "bad" must accompany the good ... and that the "bad" reviews are the ones that make you a better writer. Thanks for the R&R, scribbler!
Shaikh says, "Said to him thank you very much indeed." Thank YOU!
salliemoffitt says, "Thank you for writing an essay on this topic. My cousin self-published a book through Publish America and now thinks she's a literary genius. Before she published it, my cousin received no feedback or critique and was told she didn't need to have it edited. Thank goodness for WDC where we serious writers can receive honest feedback and improve our writing without the lure of $$$. Sure, some self-published books are quality reads, but those are written by the authors who did some serious homework. Loved the newsletter." Thank you, Sallie! And thank you for reading and taking the time to comment.
BIG BAD WOLF is Howling says, "A good story is like cake and ice cream: You want to eat it up." Yes! And you're sorry when it ends. Thank you for the feedback!
sofie712 says, "Most interested in your article on self-publishing. There are a couple of things that have always turned me off about it. One is that I'm an unpublished writer who can't afford to self-publish. Second, even though it is an ever more popular market, I believe it's much more difficult to handle the logistics in self-publishing than the agent/publisher method. Anyone else feel the same?" No kidding! It's not cheap to self-publish. I often wonder if they make it up in sales. I would love to hear from self-published authors who are willing to share their stories.
Thank you ALL for taking the time to read and comment. I wish each and every one of you a safe and Merry Christmas surrounded by people you love. See you in 2011!
Submitted Items
| | Broken (E) A little boy who loses everything. Yet, in a strange way gains everything. #1723342 by EBliss242 |
|
ASIN: B083RZ37SZ |
|
Amazon's Price: Price N/A
Not currently available. |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, click here for your newsletter subscription list. Simply uncheck the box next to any newsletter(s) you wish to cancel and then click to "Submit Changes". You can edit your subscriptions at any time.
|