Particle Theory vs Field Theory

        Particle Theory vs Field Theory


Just a different way of looking at things.  Today I'm thinking.  Physics has theorized various fields which have turned out to be highly descriptive of reality.  The interrelationships of fields, both proven and postulated, have almost, adequately described reality  --  electrical, magnetic, gravitational, Higg's, etc.  --  even individual particles can be described as fields.  Fields are perceived or not perceived; describable mathematically, or not.  Much more of reality could be described if physicists would allow for a Field of Mind.  Most physicists believe that mind is somehow included in the electro-magnetic field,  but it is not. The electro-magnetic field does not explain all phenomena which includes mind.  All reality can be described as a relationship of fields.  An electric field and a magnetic field are separately identified, but they become more descriptive when looked at in conjunction.  Simply postulate a totally separate Mind Field; think of mind as a physical entity, possibly composed of as yet undiscovered particles.  The acceptance of the fact that something is there, that can be interelated with other fields, will allow the description, and understanding, of a significantly greater portion of reality.