Native to the Americas, the turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) travels widely in search of sustenance. While usually foraging alone, it relies on other individuals of its species for companionship and mutual protection. Sometimes misunderstood, sometimes feared, sometimes shunned, it nevertheless performs an important role in the ecosystem.
This scavenger bird is a marvel of efficiency. Rather than expend energy flapping its wings, it instead locates uplifting columns of air, and spirals within them in order to glide to greater heights. This behavior has been mistaken for opportunism, interpreted as if it is circling doomed terrestrial animals destined to be its next meal. In truth, the vulture takes advantage of these thermals to gain the altitude needed glide longer distances, flying not out of necessity, but for the joy of it.
It also avoids the exertion necessary to capture live prey, preferring instead to feast upon that which is already dead. In this behavior, it resembles many humans.
It is not what most of us would consider to be a pretty bird. While its habits are often off-putting, or even disgusting, to members of more fastidious species, the turkey vulture helps to keep the environment from being clogged with detritus. Hence its Latin binomial, which translates to English as "golden purifier."
I rarely know where the winds will take me next, or what I might find there. The journey is the destination.
Um, weren't they called Trolls before this? Is this some new gen?? thing where they come up with a new name for something that's already been named?
Granted- I suppose not all Trolls make money being trolls- but...it's the same thing. Someone that gets off- whether financially or otherwise out of pushing buttons by saying disgusting things.
Politicians are kind of forced to take a black or white approach to certain issues because they are tasked to cast votes on behalf of their own voters. There are votes where there should be no room for nuance. Like, we can't choose to "nuke such and such city only a little bit." We either nuke it or we don't.
The problem in this case aren't politicians who say, "It's a hard no from me." The problem are the conflict entrepreneurs who want to rile up enough voters into calling their representatives to cast a "yes" vote on nuking such and such city.
"We see example after example in popular media of people who make their living off of reducing complicated issues into black-and-white binaries, removing nuance from conversation in favor of parroted talking points, and stereotyping the many based off the actions of the few."
I think we call these people politicians, whom we elect to govern, which is why there is much governance taking place.
Okay, first of all, no; second, first you'd have to find and identify them.
This tactic may not stop the entrepreneurs themselves (at least not right away). However, they can make people engaging with the content pause. This is the stance I've taken for over a decade, and it has served me well I dealing with engaging with people/content online.
Robert Waltz - Point taken. Perhaps the unfairness is that it takes so few to "upset the apple cart" for the many. I do like to believe in the good in people. And maybe the "some of us" will be enough to tip that balance in the fair favor for at least a little while.
JACE- Personally, I don't think so. Unless that's what you were trying for. But you don't strike me as a strifemonger, so I doubt it.
I do disagree, though. Respectfully. The concept of "fairness" is a purely human one, like "liberty" or "justice," and fairness can only be judged and moderated by humans. Life is inherently unfair, but some of us like to try to make it less unfair.
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.39 seconds at 5:52pm on Feb 06, 2026 via server WEBX1.