*Magnify*
◄     October    
2022
SMTWTFS
      
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
24
26
27
28
29
30
31
Archive RSS
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://shop.writing.com/main/profile/blog/chantellemarie/day/10-25-2022
Printer Friendly Page Tell A Friend
No ratings.
Rated: GC · Book · Writing · #2283087
A collection of thoughts
Crystal Dragon
A creature of strength. One who may intimidate and strike fear into the hearts of others with its fiery presence. Yet, it is also a fragile creature - exposed through openness, transparency, and vulnerability.
October 25, 2022 at 2:12pm
October 25, 2022 at 2:12pm
#1039704
Are we truly representative of the diverse general public like we claim to be? Are we truly engaging the public equally and providing assistance to those who truly need it with these targeted programs and incentives we come up with in our virtual boardrooms? We put out calls for public engagement and feedback on plans and frameworks and then pat ourselves on the back for being open and transparent and inclusive with these processes, but are we actually excluding large swaths of our population in the very formalized and structured way that we request their engagement? We put up these 30-100 plus page documents and send them out to communities to be implemented, but were they engaged in the plan? Did they provide feedback? What about their citizens? These huge documents full of government jargon and language are incredibly difficult for the average person to interpret and understand – I still have trouble with all of the jargon and acronyms! Even the pre-work to this course, it was a 23 page document to review. It provided an outline of ideas and step by step instructions. Some structure, a framework. I skimmed through it, dismayed by the very rigid and formalized way the information was presented. Do you want to know what stood out to me? Page 9 Planning and Design principles. Know the experience and motivation of your audience. Modify the level of detail for your audience. One suggestion in the BC public service is 2-4 slides for executives. Keyword points on slides to facilitate absorption – max of 6 words per screen.

Executives want bullet points and the Coles notes version of complex problems, yet we expect the general public to digest these extensive, jargon filled documents and provide feedback, sometimes in the form of a written essay in a set time frame. We exclude them by intimidating them. Is it possible that we are creating a deeper divide instead of building bridges and creating connections with communities with these processes? Are we really representing the best interests of the average citizen of BC? Are we really champions of diversity, equity, and inclusion or are we just trying to fill quotas and create elaborate documents full of buzzwords that will make us look good in the eyes of other high-level, very educated people and their associated institutions? Are we truly trying to build back better or are we just making more empty promises and speaking hollow words? Are we actually engaging the public we claim to represent? Are we actually capturing the diversity of thought, diversity of opinion, and diversity of experience from our audience?

So, I have to ask all of you: What are we doing and who are we really serving? Do we really know our audience? Do we really understand them?
October 25, 2022 at 12:54pm
October 25, 2022 at 12:54pm
#1039702
All of these definitions thrown around are great and all; building resiliency and capacity and supporting learning and development are nice thoughts; and building frameworks is nice as it’s good to have a backbone and reference for future employees as guidance, but what is the outcome and action of all of this planning? What is actually being achieved with all of these skills growth projects and needs/gaps assessments?

How does succession management translate to action on the ground? What does this mean to the front line employees and people on the receiving end of our services? How does this serve the citizens of BC? When are we going to move from conversations about definitions and how important it is to build relationships and actually translate this into actual change in the real world? I’ve been in government for 7 months and heard so many buzzwords and talk about change and strategy, but I’ve seen so little real and measurable change and action. The future of BC and the government is in our hands, isn’t it? What’s standing in the way of results and forward movement? Can someone please explain why this all takes so long to translate into the real world?

And all of this talk about employee engagement is great, but you aren’t actually engaging us. At least, that is my experience. I feel totally disappointed and disengaged with my position. I am underutilized and bored out of my mind. I don’t even know why I am here being paid each day yet, I still show up and fill my time with helping anyone who asks me for anything and by engaging with your learning offerings in the hopes of advancing my position/career – hoping that I might make a real difference for the future of BC and especially, for all of the people who live here. I feel like I am wasting my time here and it’s incredibly frustrating.
October 25, 2022 at 2:16am
October 25, 2022 at 2:16am
#1039683
I get know your audience, but if you are writing online to a very broad and general audience, how do you keep your words real and authentic while appealing to everyone? You can't possibly please everyone. You can't possibly not offend some people. You also can't trim and neuter your words to fit the new inclusive ideology that seems to be permeating everywhere. It's gotten to the point, in many spheres, that so much is said, but nothing has true substance or meaning anymore. What about freedom of thought, expression, opinion, conscience, and the UN Declaration of Human Rights? It was written, with great care, for very good reason.

*Addendum*
Not every human on the planet is "pleased" with the UDHR1, and that is also okay. It is very well-written and a consensus was met at a very pivotal time in our shared history. I believe it is applicable to all human beings on the planet, even though not every single voice on the planet was included. Some classical texts, documents, and oral teachings/traditions truly stand the test of time.*Heart*

Footnotes
1  https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights



© Copyright 2023 Crystal Dragon (UN: chantellemarie at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Crystal Dragon has granted Writing.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work.

Printed from https://shop.writing.com/main/profile/blog/chantellemarie/day/10-25-2022