\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
BY ONLINE AUTHORS
Printed from https://shop.writing.com/main/profile/notebook/akinra
Please follow an 18+ rating.*
if the north equals south and the south equals west and the east follows after the north as the west rules eastern plains and north lights follow south at the pole why does it always equal another south east west and north if it totals another altogether in the final tally of lifes triangle or in this case square except the compass equals a star as each direction may carry the other in the final calculation that counts as a navagator but how does it navagate when no direction really makes cense?
is it possible to learn more than you already know if you already know all there is that you need to know? should you learn more than you need to know to be more than you should be? if you already are all that you should be why should you be more than you can? is it too much of a task to contain our knowlage of the world to what we should know to what we can? how stuburn is this race? why must we know everything? isnt what we must enough? i think so. yet no matter what we do, it will never stop.
* Content and content ratings in this area are monitored solely by this member. Page owners have the ability to remove posts and/or block posters who do not follow the content rating or who post unwanted content. In addition, each member can block/ignore another member using the Block/Ignore Members" link on the Account Options screen.
Printed from https://shop.writing.com/main/profile/notebook/akinra