Dear StoryMaster,
This is a very helpful text and a good general guideline. However, some of the points can be understood wrongly and lead to misunderstandings.
I like reviewing. The effort it takes is rewarded by knowing that we share our thoughts about the work we've read with its author. This feeling is better than any gift points it can earn :) However, I must say it is a brilliant idea to reward the reviewer with gift points for reviewing an author s/he hasn't reviewed before. Writing a review does take some time and it's nice to know it's appreciated, besides this system encourages to pay more attention to the writers who are new on this site. Anyway, I review a lot and keeping in mind my experience both as an author and a reviewer, I must say I do disagree with some of the thoughts presented here.
Reviews should be honest. Helping writers improve their craft is the mission of Writing.Com. Honest opinions are what help writers improve. Giving false feedback doesn't help anyone and can lead an author down a long road to bitter disappointment.
With this I agree 100%. However, there is a problem each of us has probably faced: what do I do when I absolutely hate the item I've read? If I am to be honest, I should say just that, in a respectful way of course. This is very difficult. A respectful way of saying that would be, for example: you really need to work on this. But it happens, rarely on it site, nevertheless it does happen that there is nothing that could be done with THIS particular item, that the best thing would be to delete it and write something else. Is no review better than a review saying just that? I wouldn't mind hearing an HONEST opinion like that. But how do I know if this author feels the same way? Is no review better than an extremely critical review? Well, the former is a much safer option...
Reviews should be encouraging. Writing.Com is a site for writers of all ages and skill levels. Everyone at every level should be encouraged to continue writing! Encouraging reviews are more likely to be used by an author which means the time creating the review was well spent. Whether the author decides to use the reviewer's honest suggestions or not, the review should be motivating and encourage the author to keep writing.
I agree! But - it shouldn't be understood too literally. It doesn't, in my opinion, mean that we should always, at the end of each review add "Write on!" It would then become a clichéd, meaningless phrase. It should be used when we just spontaneously happen to think of writing it. I think getting a review is already encouraging, provided it's written with respect, which moves us on to
Reviews should be respectful. Regardless of an author's level of skill or talent, a reviewer should always respect that the author is an individual person. A reviewer flaunting that they are better than the author they're reviewing is not respectful and is counter productive.
I agree 100%. Even if the item is offensive or seems to have been placed on the site as some kind of a bad joke, a civilised reviewer should be ble to say it in a polite manner.
I think "counterproductive" should be written together or with a hyphen. If I'm wrong, I'm sorry.
Reviews should be well rounded. While honesty is very important, a review that points out only flaws without any mention of an item's positive points is not nearly as helpful to an author as a well rounded review with both positive and negative remarks. Don't forget, the same goes for reviews that only point out positives! Even the greatest pieces of writing have room for suggestions and opinions.
There is usually something good to say about someone else's work. It doesn't always work the other way. Sometimes we just love the work and don't see anything wrong with it. I would fear that some reviewers, having read "Guidelines", will take it too seriously and try to look for faults where there aren't any. That wouldn't be honest, would it? People often put these works on the site which they consider perfect and complete. Let us allow them to be the final judges of their work, unless we really think that something should be changed.
The rating should reflect the review. If you're sending a review full of corrections, it's important to consider that with your star rating selection. 5.0's shouldn't need any corrections. On the other extreme, a 1.0 should have endless errors and you couldn't possibly list them all. Offering to return and rerate the item after a round of updates makes it more likely your suggestions will be considered.
The rating should reflect the review to a point. Beyond that point, it is impossible. How do I sum up a review that is pages long with one single rating? I know this is a problem that every school teacher has to face but on the level of writing that most authors on this site represent such rating is very difficult. It should, in my opinion, represent our overall impression of the item.
I don't agree that 5 shouldn't need any corrections. A minor punctuation mistake in a womderful poem that made my heart miss a beat doesn't mean a thing to me, especially that it can be easily corrected. I know that I can go back and re-rate the item after the missing comma has been added but, knowing myself, I know I won't, I will simply forget all about it, busy with reading other things and DOING other things, and the rating will stay there forever. So, punctuation and spelling mistakes don't influence my rating much (or at all) unless there are lots of them and they make the text hard to read or understand.
I recommend "My Rating Philosophy" by David Kraken (I'm sorry, I haven't yet learnt to make links... But perhaps you would like to put a link to it under "Guidelines"? If you agree with the author, of course. David Kraken, folder: Kraken's Korner).
Use "copied and pasted" portions of the item you are reviewing as little as possible. Posting sections of an item within your review leads to "review bloating" and takes away from the impact your comments and suggestions will have on the author.
On the other hand, I find it very helpful (I don't mean the situation when the copied parts take up more space than the review itself). Especially when the review is on the Reviewing Page, it makes it easier for others to understand what the reviewer means. It may also encourage them to read the reviewed item. This is, however, the opinion of an internet-lazy person who doesn't like clicking. I like to have things ready in front of my eyes :) Some might not agree with me.
I'm sorry if I've "bloated" this review a bit!
Get into the good habit of using a custom tag-line of encouragement within your reviews. Including "Write On!", "Keep Writing!" or something unique and individual within your reviews goes a long way to motivating an author. We know you mean it, so don't forget to say it!
I might be a bit of an anarchist ;) but I don't like doing things when I'm told I should :))) I probably do enourage the authors I review in some way but it has to spontaneously come from my heart. Otherwise it would look fake. "You know I mean it, so don't make me say it!", I would shout rebelliously as an anarchist reviewer. You know I mean it, otherwise I wouldn't be reviewing your work at all. So don't feel offended when I don't say it, and you don't have to say it to me, unless it spontaneously comes from your heart, of course. I will write on. "I'm gonna do it anyway/even if it doesn't pay" (Gillian Welch).
And one more personal thought. You give very good suggestions for writing a proper, detailed review. As an author, I don't expect all reviews to be long and detailed. Writing such a review takes time we don't always have, and sometimes we might not have too much to say, even if we've liked the piece. In such a situation, I prefer to write just a line or two than to write nothing. It's another story when I know I will be automatically "paid" for the review. Then I try to give as many helpful suggestions as possible, and if I have liked the work and have no suggestions, I explain what I liked most. But - I do believe that a short review is much better than no review at all, (if it is honest, naturally, but that has already been said).
There are some issues that you could mention and that you might not even realise happen on Writing.Com:
- the Rating Revenge. It has happened to me, not too often, luckily. Thinking that the author wants it, I review an item with full honesty and rate it likewise. The author, probably not too happy about the rating, goes to my port, rates my works lower than they deserve and sends me an unpleasant e-mail. I will not review anything by such an author after that.
- rating an item according to the previous ratings. How do I know it happens? Example: an item is given a five a couple of times, then a two (revenge?). After that, no one gives it a five again. Coincidence? Happened too many times, to my works and to those of other authors.
...
Having said all this...
WRITE ON!!! :)
Agnie |
|