An auspicious beginning. It appears to be fairly original, and I wonder how the story will progress. However, I have to say there are parts that look quite very unrealistic to me. First, I'm not saying the whole scenario is impossible, but you're talking about entire governments, not just some hidden organization or select elite members, agreeing upon this purge event. Even if this is true, there is just no way such planning and operation would happen undetected. It's hard to make a gathering of international leaders that unofficial. They would have to divert the attention of the world and converse in such a fashion that no reporter would guess what was happening. Even if that was achieved, why would the government officials agree on it? How can they be sure this is not some ridiculous attempt by one country to bomb another? What could the profit and power-sensitive people in the government possibly gain from this? Their former positions and money will become completely useless! It's just unbelievable that at least one sane person in the Senate or a global leader in another nation would try to reveal this scheme or try to thwart it. Or maybe that's it. It is so absurd an idea that no one would believe it could happen even if they were told about it. Alright, moving on, next, missiles? How did the construction of so many special missiles slip out of anyone's radar? Also, isn't the purpose of the secret group to purge technology and start anew? Evenly spaced bombing sites mean some will fall into places like in the middle of Wyoming where there's not a human in sight within a 15 mile radius. Bombing all the major cities, urban centers, government facilities, and prisons selectively would be the logical step, even for an evil maniac. That ensures that more people from the country who are in sync with the cause, such as the Amish and rural folk, will survive. Someone who's from a city would look for any means to restart the city! Seriously, in a world where even farmers use iPhones and do Facebook chats, do you think metropolis residents will automatically abandon their lifestyle and say, yes, even though there may be a way to reverse and fix things, I'm gonna have a hippie lifestyle? Finally, it's way too unbelievable that some shady agent in an obviously unharmed black limousine followed by two armored vehicles will know exactly where all the survivors are without even actively searching and deliver flyers to everyone. The cars would need a whole lot of fuel, which it can't have since all the oil stations would have been bombed. This stuff has to be planned well in advance, not ex-machina as in Oh my god, how did I survive!? If the bombings were indiscriminate, there's no guarantee who and how many survived. Finally, Loren's thoughts are impossible. He can't possibly already be thinking that it's good having billions dead and that it was necessary in order for him and others to live as forced minimalists. There were so many other alternative methods that could have led to this conclusion, with at least far less bloodshed, if any. Killing a handful of Wall Street businessmen, serious criminals, and government officials while disabling networks and machines through collaborated hacking could have done most of the job. Look, I like the attempt and the idea, but you have to make this way more believable to the readers. Even fairy tales have to have solid logic and causation to be masterpieces. Sure, I tend to be more strict about deus ex-machina style story progressions than most people, but it's because ex-machinas distance the writer's creation from the readers, since they can't feel or agree with what the characters are feeling. Stories are your universe, but also a hub with which you communicate with the readers. Thus, you must know what you are trying to convey, and I assume you're not trying to give me a dream fantasy but a dystopian world story. I'm being harsh now, but I sincerely hope it could help you, so please don't take it as an assault but more as an austere critique, whether you agree to it or not. |
|