Hi Appi,
I wanted to stop by and take a look at some of your other items. I am pleased to see that you are creating some variety in your portfolio. I enjoyed reading your essay “About trouble, joy, peace, and hope.” Your essay is well formed. The paragraphs are tight; they stay on topic. The paragraphs flow smoothly one to the next in a logical order. The overall development of the paper is excellent.
The voice of the narrator seems removed from the writing, almost ghostlike or perhaps angle-like, in that the piece feels lacking in emotion. I think the frequent qualifiers take away from the intensity of the statements. Words like, sometimes, seems, more or less, tend to water down a statement, making it less powerful or certain. Most readers will understand this is your interpretation, your belief. Your name is on the writing; trust the reader to understand this is your opinion. Don’t be afraid to make strong, bold statements. Be confident in your truth. The writing will be that much stronger and infused with your passion for Peter’s words. Qualifiers have their place; I use them often in reviews to water down criticism, but they are less valuable when writing persuasive arguments.
I love the fact that you are not afraid of complex sentence structures. Your simple sentences stand out as poignant against the backdrop of complexity. “Peter writes of hope.” It practically leaps of the page! Excellent use of structure to reinforce the complexity of emotions you are discussing. Having said this, some of the passages are hard to follow. Check for comma usage and subject-verb agreement problems.
For example, look at this: “Some people would have had incidental experiences that are a taste of the very thing but Peter is addressing something different here.” I noticed a couple issues in this statement: 1) why say ‘would have had”? Indeed, some people have had experiences. 2) Doesn’t ‘a taste’ mean the same thing as incidental in this context? 3) You say “the very thing” when referring to joy and hope. Aren’t joy and hope two things? I noticed this switch frequently in your writing. “Joy and peace is the base…” Try instead, joy and peace are…
Parallel construction can tighten your writing even more. “These gifts can be rendered ineffective by fear, doubt, or if help is seeked (sought) from other instances than God.” You have a list; fear and doubt are nouns, if the third item in the list were also a noun, the rhythm of the sentence would not be interrupted. A balanced sentence adds credibility to the statement. The reader will recognize something is wrong with this sentence but may not know what it is. You don’t want them to suspect the verity of the statement. You might want to drop the third item and make it a separate statement. (You write, “other instances than God.” Is God and instance? It kind of sounds like this is what you are saying. Consider rephrasing. Maybe something like, people sometimes seek help from sources other than God…)
Try simplifying some of your phrases to add strength. “Peter writes of hope.” Hope gives him faith in God and hope rewards him with life, a life filled with peace and joy. Do you see how you can use structure and language to infuse your writing with tone, style, movement, and passion?
I think my favorite line in this essay is “Peter writes of hope.” It is so perfectly stated and well suited to the essay. Beautiful! Nice writing. I enjoyed your essay and look forward to seeing more of your writing.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts,
Keep writing!
Tuesday |
|