What I liked{{/size}/u}
You are attempting to write a full story about Napoleonic battles with good politics, weather, and morale. This is not something a beginner would do. The atmosphere is also strong and consistent. Cold, snow, exhaustion, and hunger. It makes Russia feel hostile in each paragraph. Nature, being an enemy, works well.
Your research on this subject is also very good. You have a clear understanding of periodic warfare. The tension between Gulliemont, Jacque, and Choinburnt also adds an internal conflict.
The moments of proper drama come with the grenade plan, holding the square, and Choinburnt’s last stand. These are very effective. It ends very emotionally. The frozen scout under the horse is strong and quiet after so much chaos.
What I don’t like
This scene has done the work that a few chapters would have been better at. The battle keeps restarting, but emotionally. You have a new threat, a new square, a new charge, new dialogue. You should trim up to about half of it, or spread it out through more chapters. The stakes can escalate no further as they have already reached their peak.
Many of the sentences are overwritten, tangled, or grammatically incorrect. You have misused commas and varying tenses (past, present, and future). You use a lot of metaphors, but where there are five normal beats, you could have one really strong one.
The characters give speeches in the middle of battle, which feels unrealistic. Many of the arguments repeat the same point over again, which can bore the reader.
The point of view drifts between Gulliemont, Jacque, Choinburnt, and the omniscient narrative. Unless you are doing separate chapters with these POV’s, then this should be changed to just one POV.
Conclusion
All in all, this was a good story, though with plenty of mistakes. If you went back and refined it, then I am sure you will do well. Keep writing.
kadenkoker  . |