First impressions(or this review in substantially less words) : Powerful imagery, inventive metaphors, maybe a few minor structural rearrangements necessary, overall a brilliantly abstract, almost stream-of-consciousness effort.
POINTS OF EXCELLENCE
"but to just keep switching off and on."
The simplicity of this line is what makes it brilliant, that all but one of the words are monosyllabic really gives it that blunt, resigned nature. It perfectly underpins the mundane, reductionist idea that you give us in the "sun of fifty thousand lightbulbs.".
"I swim in thinning ink"
This is one of the better lines I've read in quite some time. It is itself, a brilliant, abstract image but the composition brings it truly to life. The assonance of the relentless i vowels give it thrust and the reader finds himself lost in darkness. Magnificent stuff, reinforced by:
"stains my glasses black"
Stained glass is a poignant spiritual image, and the authors own glasses give it a more personal touch.
"that cradle my wrists until / they melt of ephemeral heaviness."
The interior rhyme of wrists and heaviness is exquisite, ephemeral is a delightfully chosen word. The metre of the the poem is strongest in this line - it's got perfect cadence to it and you can hear the heartbeat of the poem pounding through this line.
"...rotten- / ripe tomato / on the street."
A very desolate image indeed. Here the form comes into its own and the enjambement is perfect to leave us feeling cold and alone. A terrific closing line.
POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION
At times the form or structure is brilliant as I've already mentioned. That said, I think there's room for rearrangement. I get a real wandering feeling to the poem and maybe a few more variations in line length to give the shape a more in and out, meandering look to it would capture the brilliant stream-of-thought feeling you've got going on here. That said, I wouldn't compromise the thrust of the poem in doing so.
Maybe you have a bit more to say? I always get told off for this and it's a real pain in the backside to hear this in a review, but you've mastered the imagery you've got so far - maybe there is room to take this a step further and really delve into the consciousness of the narrator. Obviously you don't want to go overboard, but a few more powerful portraits might bring out a little bit more of the delightful schizophrenia the poem displays.
There is room for a little bit more imagination in a couple of instances. The idea of a wilting rose is a classic one, but I'm sure there is a more interesting idea you can get across there. Even changing the word wilting to something a bit more dynamic would do the trick - we've become so accustomed to the imagery throughout the years that it's lost its effect to some extent. Dig out your thesaurus perhaps, see if you can find something that cuts to the heart of what you really feel rather than what you think your feelings should resemble on the page.
Another instance is in the word beautiful, and I can't make my mind up as to whether it's a brilliant choice of word or a weak one. On one hand, it is describing the contents of a note and you wouldn't get very flowery language in such a setting and so in portraying the simplicity of this scenario maybe from lover to lover or friend to friend, it is brilliant. Speaking as a poet however, I see the word beauty as a bit of a cop out, maybe there's something a bit more specific and powerful. As I said, it is one of those words we are very accustomed to seeing in poetry. I'll leave this one up to you.
SUMMARY
A brilliantly executed piece of poetry by a skilled wordsmith. As with any piece of work, there is room not so much for improvement but for reconsideration. The route to mastery is in obsession, so it will never hurt to have another couple of reads over this bearing in mind what you're trying to say, who you're saying it to and why you're saying it. You've done an excellent job here.
I may, in your opinion, be completely wrong in my judgements about this poem - it is at your discretion whether you take my advice or not, and only you know the true intentions of the poem. That said, if I am completely wrong in my interpretation (though I aim to keep interpretation very loosely attached to my reviews as it's not that productive), then maybe more work is needed than is on the surface. At the end of the day, whatever the nuances people like myself pick up, if we the readers truly agree with you, as I'm certain we do, then you've truly accomplished your aims.
This is a very successful poem, I wish you all the best for the future.
Joe. |
|