First Look:
When I first picked this up (I always print out writing I'm supposed to be reviewing), I braced myself for another depressing, Gothic tone, another boring sad-story. And I was very wrong to do so. You have taken the common need to be with someone, to love, and pulled it into the uncommon realm of good writing.
(I know this was something you wrote a while ago, but I'm still going to point out everything I can to make it better if you decide to revise it.)
Technical Errors:
There were no specific grammar, punctuation, spelling, or sentence structure issues.
What I didn't like:
1. The first "problem" lies within your sentence arrangement, or syntax. According to Dictionary.com...
Syntax is the study of the patterns of formation of sentences and phrases from words.
The issue: You have a very "choppy" style with this piece. You use simple sentences like they're going out of style. I think the piece flows well already, but maybe a few compound, complex sentences would spice it up and further produce the writing via ethos. (Ethos: the disposition, character, or fundamental values peculiar to a specific person, people, culture, or movement. Or in my own terms: the appeal to a person's credibility.) By adding more complicated sentences to your writing--not just here, but anywhere--your audience is going to take you more seriously if it seems that you have a good control of literature and diction.
2. "The hole I speak of, is the absence of someone to share with, cry with, and love." -- This is another example which I'm going to be a stickler about. With the initiation or the list in this excerpt, you're setting yourself up for an anaphora. (Anaphora: Repetition of a word or words at the beginning of two or more successive verses, clauses, or sentences. This is a very powerful rhetoric device which would be very well equipped here. Try to see if you can re-arrange the list (most notably, change "love" to some that fits with the previously commenced) to fit the anaphora; I think it will improve this piece to some extent.
3. "The sound of people laughing as a result of my natural gift is a temporary desensitization of the pain and emptiness I feel inside." -- I know this is a little shallow, but I don't truly know what this "natural gift" is. It could be that you do an amazing imitation of Daniel Craig (The dude in the latest James Bond) or that you can stand of your hands while drinking a keg of Red Stripe beer. I would assume logically that you have the native ability to be generally hilarious, but how should I know? Please elaborate.
4. "The fact is, I find negative emotions much easier to embrace than the positive ones I so desperately need." -- There is nothing specifically wrong with this sentence, but it just seems to be a lack of creative writing when you've got phrases like "The time line of my existence has never had the inclusion of someone who would be the keeper of my key to happiness." This particular one seems too common and unoriginal. Maybe a good revision would be...
The fact is, negative emotions hold a insatiable perception of need within me, while optimism seems to slip through my mind's fingers like wet sand.
If you don't like this, I still think this sentence could do with some attention.
Overall, no major mistakes, and nothing that was really appalling or unattractive to my literary mind.
What I liked:
1. My favorite phrase in the entire work was...
"The sound of people laughing as a result of my natural gift is a temporary desensitization of the pain and emptiness I feel inside."
...because it is perfectly timed in the piece and is worded almost perfectly in regards to summing up the paragraph which holds it. The use of the word "desensitization" is well-employed and makes a lot of sense. Another big reason I liked it is because it's something that I can relate to. I went through a depressing period of my life--surfacing just recently--and these specific idioms catch my eye quite coercively.
2. Your tone and style stay constant and direct throughout the entirety of the monologue. You'd be surprised--and maybe not so surprised--at how many people fluctuate on such points consistently throughout their opuses. you show the audience that you have a well-devised idea--a concrete idea--of what you're writing about: something many of us have a problem with.
3. You have some extremely powerful phrases in this work. They are speckled thought the piece and you don't waste any chance to get a good one in there. Here are my favorites:
a. "The time line of my existence has never had the inclusion of someone who would be the keeper of my key to happiness."
b. "I have had few chances at reaching a level of contentment, only to spiral further down into the recesses of misery."
c. "Fear of rejection all too often overpowers my will to pursue happiness. My walls are very high, and not easily scaled. I need help breaking them down, and to be loved for who I am."
d. "I hope someday I can taste the sweet fruit of togetherness instead of biting the bitter pill of loneliness."
All in all, You have a very well-developed piece here which stands very well by itself, even if you wrote it ten years ago. my only qualms are with you slipping into a common wording of things, like: "I need to break the chains of complacency, and strive to find that special someone that would occupy the void my heart contains." Or: "If only the pain could be replaced by the sheer warmth that only love can provide." I've seem phrasing like this all over the literary world, and they get boring after a time.
This is a very good piece, and will earn a seat in my hall of fame. For now.
Overall Rating (I always round down): 4.7
Thanks for the amazing read. It made my day.
~Tilli.
(PS: This review is free of charge considering I have not put a specific cost for monologues. Please spread word of my forum if you liked this review.) |
|