A short thought I've had with no idea who to talk to. Warning; anti-homosexual based |
I don't know what I'm thinking, really. I've had this thought for a while, and basicaly I'm loosing sleep over it. This is what I put this profile up; put these thoughts out of my head for a little while. But who do you turn to with things like this? Most anti gay groups can be a bit extreme, scientists are too busy augmenting DNA in fruitflies to ignore females, so I don't want to bother them during that little breakthrough, Theologists who do not support homosexiality is a good choice if you can find one with an email address, heck I don't know why I'm putting it here; most public critiquing prowess can be a little... daunting. And what's the possibilty that somebodies going to read this But here we go, I can't hold this off for much longer; The argument is that Homosexuality(H) is a variable in the DNA, therefore natural Just like normal Sexual Intercourse(SI). Another natural part of sexual intercourse is the consequence; reproduction(R). Because anyone who knows the human body knows that reproduction was the sole purpose of sexual intercourse. So; (SI) = Stimuli (S) And; (R) = Consequence (C) So If; (C) = Natural (N) Then (S) = (N) The upshot of all this is if Reproduction can occur naturally from Sexual Intercourse, then Sexual Intercourse is also Natural. However, Homosexuality does NOT naturally trigger Reproduction, so the formula will go as such (H) = (S) and (H) = (SI) and (R) = (C) Considering (H) does not -> (C), (H) = Un-Natural (UN) Because Homosexuality CANNOT fulfil its one purpose as a form of Sexual intercourse, can in no way be natural. With this, I find it hard to see why DNA would evolve such an unnatural mind set. Aren't all living things born with survival instincts? Nobody taught a spider to spin webs to catch it's food, nor give a baby turtle directions when it comes out of it's egg. Isn't reproducing a sole part of all instincts? And how does DNA change the way people think? It changes the way they look, what gender they are, wether they have they're mothers eyes or their dads. I believe it's all in the mind, that's where people form opinions, thats where people think, hopefully. What if it's all previous experiences, the enviroment one lives in, what they hear, what's impinted on them. I for one live in a christian based lifestyle, and had a bit of a bad run in with a Homosexual some time ago, so as such I have a negative mindset. as the situation changes with every individual being, people will without a doubt think differently from me. This theory came to me while pondering on the fake gay marriages proceeded somewhere near our parliment as a protest or something ((Yeah, very mature argument. People are deffinatley take them 'serial' now.)) It came to me once again when listening to the radio, where the Queen of Pop, Lady Gaga, was interveiwed about her ((hir?)) latest and most contoversial music video for "Telephone" or something. The alarms went off for me when she said, and I quote 'People think that Homosexuality is a choice but really were just born like that.' What ticked me was that the way she said it was like it was a world known and accepted, solid fact. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that still in Debate stage? Excuse the nostalgia but I liked the times where deep moving themes of music videos where a little more subtle. By the sounds of it, it cuts pretty close to Propaganda to me, but thats just my opinion. |