No ratings.
PROTECTION FROM SICKNESS DR BY JAMES TYLER KENT A,M.M.D |
PROTECTION FROM SICKNESS BYDR OF HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICINE JEMES TYLER KENT FROM THESE PARAGRAPHS THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL KINDS OF PROTECTION FROM SICKNESS. WHEN A VOILENT EPIDEMIC OR PENDEMIC IS RAGING WE ALL KNOW THAT, ALTHOUGH THE NUMBER OF VICTIMS IS LARGE.THE ARE FEW COMPARED TO THOSE WHO GO THROUGH THE EPIDEMIC UNSCATHED, AND THE QUESTION ALWAYS ARISES, WHY IS IT? WE SUPPOSE AND PROBABLY RIGHTLY SO, THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF THE IMMUNE HAVE ESCAPED BECAUSE THEY WERE USUALLY STRONG AND VIGOROUS,OR IN A STATE OF VERY GOOD ODER,BUT WE FIND AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE ESCAPED THE EPIDEMIC A NUMBER OFPERSONS WHO ARE ANYTHING BUT STRONG, REALLY INVALIDS ONE IN CONSUMPTION, ANOTHER THE LAST STAGES OF BRIGHT’S DISEASE, ANOTHER DIABETES.WE CALL THEM ALL TOGETHER AND FIND THAT NONE OF THEM HAVE HAD DYSENTERY OF SMALLPOX . OR WHAT EVER DISEASE WAS EPIDEMIC. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SUSCEPTABLE TO EPIDEMIC INFLUENCES . HOW ARE YOU GOING TO EXPLAIN THIS? THE REASON IS THAT THEY HAVE SICKNESS THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE EPIDEMIC TO SUPPRESS. THE EPIDEMIC IS ALLOPATHIC,OR DISSMILAR TO THEIR DISEASES, AND CAN NOT SUPPRESS THEIR DISEASE BECAUSE OF ITS VIRULENCY. NOW IF THEY HAVE SOME MILD FROM CHRONIC DISESASE, A SEVERE ATTACK OF DYSENTRY WILL CAUSE THAT DISEASE TO DISAPPEAR TEMPORARILY, AND THE NEW EPIDEMIC (EPIDEMIC DISESASE WILL TAKE HOLD AND RUN ITS COURSE, AND WHEN IT SUBSIDES THE OLD SYMPTOMS WILL COME BACK AGAIN AND GO ON AS IF THEY HAD NOT BEEN MEDDLED WITH.THIS IS AN ILLUSTRATION OF DISSIMILARS, AND SHOWS THAT DISSIMILARS ARE UNABLE TO CURE; THEY CAN ONLY SUPPRESS. IF THE CHRONIC DISEASE IS STORNGERR THAT THE EPIDEMIC DISEASE, I.E., IF IT HAS AN ORGANIC HOLD UPON THE BODY, IT CANNOT BE SUPPRESSED. THIS IS ESSENTIALLY THE RELATION OF THE ACUTE DISSIMILAR DISEASE TO THE CHRONIC DISEASE OF SEVERITY. THE RELATION BETWEEN CHRONIC DISSMILLAR DISEASES IS SOME WHAT DIFFERENT.FOR EXAMPLE, PATIENT IS IN THE EARLIER STAGE OF BRIGHT’S DISEASE, AND THE SYMPTOMS ARE CLEAR ENOUGH TO MAKE A DIGNOSIS.HE TAKES SYPHLIS,AND AT ONCE THE KIDNEY DISEASE IS HELD IN ABEYANCE, THE ALBUMIN DISAPPEARS FROM URINE AND HIS WAXINESS ISLOST. BUT AFTER CAREFUL PRESCRIBING THE SYPHILITIC STATE DISAPPEARS, AND VERY SOON THE ALBUMIN APPEARS AGAIN IN THE URINE,THE DROPSY RETURNS AND HE DIES OF AN ORDINARY ATTACK OF BRIGHT’S DISEASE. THEN THERE ARE CASES WHERE TWO CHRONIC DISEASES SEEM AT TIMES TO ALTERNATE WITH EACH OTHER ; ONE SEEMS TO BE SUBDUED FOR A TIME AND OTHER PREVAILS. UNDER PROPER HOMOEOPATHIC TREATMENT ONE WILL BE REDUCED IN ITS ACTIVITY AND THE OTHER CHRONIC DISEASE WILL SHOW ITSELF. THIS YOU WILL FIND TO BE THE CASE WHEN YOU HAVE TO TREAT SYPHLIS AND PSORA TOGETHER . THE PSORIC PATIENT, WHO HAS BEEN SUFFRING FROM SKIN ERUPTION OR ONE OF THE VARIOUS FORMS OF PSORA , TAKES SYPHLIS. ALL THE PSORIC MANIFESTION, THE NIGHTLY ITCHING OF THE SALT RHEUM WILL DISAPPEAR, AND THE SYPHLATIC ERUPTION WILL COME ON TAKE THEIR PLACE.YOU WILL TREAT THE SYPHILITIC MANIFESTATIONS FOR WHILE AND YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SUBDUE THEM, AND IN PROPORTION AS THE DISEASE IS SUBDUED THE PSORIC MANIFESTATIONS WILL COME UP AGAIN AND WILL HOLD IN ABEYANCE THAT PORTION OF THE SYPHILITIC STATE WHICH IS STILL UNCURED.YOU WILL THEN BE COMPELLED TO DROP ANTI SYPHILITIC ANDAND TAKE UP ANTI PSORIC TEATMENTAND AGAIN THO HOMOEOPATHIC REMEDIES WILL RESTORE APPARENT ORDERR IN THE ECONOMY. BUT AFTER THIS HAS BEEN DONE , YOU WILL BE SURPRISED TO SEE SYPHILITIC STATE RETURN IN CONDITION CORRESPONDING TO ITS LAST MANIFESTATIONS. YOU MUST THEN DROP THE ANTI-PSOTIC TREATMENT AND RESUME THE ANTI SYPHILITIC .THES THEY ALTERNATE;WHEN YOU WEAKEN ONE, THE STRONGER COME UP. THE UNCOMPLICATED SYPHLITIC ERUPTION DOSE NOT ITCH; BUT THE PSORIC ERUPTION AS A RULE IS AN ITCHING ERUPTION .AND THIS WILL BE SEEN IN THE ALTERATION OF THE TWO DISEASES. IN=F THE PATIENT IS GIVEIN PROPER TREATMENT HIS CONDITION IT WILL SIMPLITIED , BUTIF GIVEN OLD SCHOOL TREATMENT AS ALLOPATHIC TREATMENT IT WILL BECOME VERY COMPLICATED . THE TWO MIASMS WILL UNITE AND FROM A COMPLEXITY, WHICH IS A MOST VICIOUS STATE AFFAIRS ; THEN THE SYPHLITIC ERUPTIONS, WHILE THEY HAVE ALL THE APPEARANCE OF SYPHLIS, WILL ITCH AS IF THEY WERE PSORIC ERUPTIONS.MERCURY IN LARGE DOSES IS CAOPABLE OF BRINGING ABPOUT SUCH A RESULT .PROPERR HOMOEOPATHIC TREATMENT CAUSES A SEPARATION , WHILW INAPPROPRIATE TREATMENT PRODUCES COMPLICATION, AND YOU WILL NEVER SEE ONE IMPROVE WHERE HOMOEOPATHIC TREATMENT CAUSES A SEPRATION, WHILE INAPPROPRIATE TREATMENT PRODUCES COMPLICATION, AND YOU WILL NEVER SEE ONE IMPROVE WHERE HOMOEOPATHIC REMIDEIS HAVE CAUSED THE TYPIING UP THE COMBINATION. AGAIN , TAKE A CHRONIC MALARIAL DIA THESIS WHICH HAS EXSITED SO LONG THATIT HAS COMPLICATED ITSELF WITH PSORA, WE WILL SEE AFTER THE QUININE HAS BEEN ANTIDOTED AND THE CHILLS AND FEVER WILL COME BACK TO ORIGNAL FORM.HERE YOU SEE AN EVIDENCE OF THE SEPARATION WHICH HOMOEOPATHY ALWAYS TENDS TO BRING ABOUT. THE MALARIAL STATE IS NOW BROUGHT INTO OBSERVATIONFOR PURPOSE OF CURE. IT CANNOT BE CURED WHEN COMPLICATED, FOR THE REMEDY CANNOTBE CLEAR THAT WILL BE SIMILAR ENOUGH TO WIPE THEM OUT THE FIRST PRSIOTION ANTIDOTES THE DRUG AND LIBERATES THE PATIENT FROM DRUG DISEASE AND THENYOUSEE THE MOST ACUTE OR LASTAPPEARING NATURAL DISEASE WHICHCOMES BACK FIRST. THIS IS IIN ACCORDANCE WITHFIXEDLAW;THE LAST MIASM OR THE LAST SYMPTOMS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE TO DISAPPEAR WILL BE THE FIRST TO RETURNAND GO AWAY TO APPEAR NO MORE. IN 36 ANOTHER THOUGHT COMES UP: ‘’THUS NON-HOMOEOPATHIC TREATMENT,WHICH IS NOT VOILENT, LEAVES THE CHRONIC DISEASE UNALTERED.TO SUPPRESS, THERE IS REQUIRED A STATE OF VIOLENCETO THE TO BE BROUGHT ABOUTUPON THE BODY; ONE MUST DO VIOLENCE TO THE ECONOMYBY ENOMOROUS DOSING , TREMENDOUS PHYSIC, MUCH SWEATING BLOOD LETTING ETC.,SUCH AS WAS DONE IN OLDEN TIMES. SUCH TREATMENT TENDS TO SUBDUE OR SUPPRESS DISEASE FOR THE TIME BEING ; BUT WHEN THE VIOLENCE HAS SUBSIDE AND THE ROUGH TREATMENT IS REMOVED THEN THE SYMPTOMS COME BACK, BUT IN MORE DISTRUBED STATE THAN BEFORE.THE MORE VIOLENTTHE DRUG DISEASE THAT CAN BE ESTABLISHED UPON THE BODY THE GREATER THE CHANGES IN THE CHRONIC DISEASE. VOILENT TREATMENT ALTERS THE NATURE OF CHRONIC DISEASE.A NEW AND MORE INTENCE DISEASE SUSPENDS A PRIOR DISSMILAR ONE EXCITING IN THE BODY ; SIMILARY, JUST SO LONG AS THE EFFECT OF QUININE CONTINUES, SO LONG WILL IT SUPPRESS AND HOLD IN ABEYANCE THE DISEASE TO WHICH IT IS DISSIMILAR . QUININE IS CAPABLE OF ENGRAFTING UPON THE ECONOMY UTS OWN DISEASE FROM WHICH WILL LAST FOR YEAR AND MAY NOT STOP UNTILL IT HAS BEEN ANTIDOTED BY A MEDICINE SIMILAR TO ITS SYMPTOMS . BUT IF IT IS ANTIDOTED BY , THAT MALARIEAL DISEASE WHICH IT SUPPRESSED WILL APEAR IN ITS ORIGNAL FORM AND THE PATIENT WILL SAY: “ THESE ARE JUST THE SYMPTOMS I HAD IN THE FIRST PLACE WHEN I WAS CURED BY THE LATE DR SO AND SO; HE CURES ME WITH PERUVINA BARK.” THATH STORY IS SO COMMON THAT ANY HOMOEOPATHIC PHYSICIAN WHO HAS BEEN DOING SOUND PRESCRIBING FOR YEARS HAS LOTS BECOUSE THE QUININE WAS CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A MORE VIOLENT DESEASE THAN MALARIA. ARSENICUM IS CAPABLE OF DIONG THE SAME THING;IT CAN ENGRAFT UPON THE ECONOMY A DANGEROUS DISEASE THAT WILL RESULT IIN VERY SERIOUS CONDITION BECOUSE THE ARSENICU WILL COMPLICATED ITSELF WITH PSORA. IN SOME CASES HAVE A COMPLEXITY OF HORRIBLE THINGS, LIKE ONE BUILT UPON ANOTHER, AND WHEN THIS IS SO , IN TREATING THEM THE LAST GROUP WHICH WAS REMOVED WILL APPEAR FIRST, WHICH SHOWS THAT HE REMEDYHAS DONE ITS WORK, AND WE THEN GO ON THE NEXT , AND SO ON,THE DIFFERENT GROUPS SOMETIMES APPEARED ONE EAFTER ANOTHER IN DISTANT FORM. THEY MUST DISAPPEAR IN THE REVERSE ORDER OF THEIR COMING, AS IF PUT ON IN LAYEARS , ONE PILED UPON ANOTHER.FROM ALL THIS WE SEE HOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR TWO DIFFERENT DISEASES TO OCCUPY, AS IT WHERE , TWO DIFFRENTCORNERS OF THE SAME ECONOMY, ONE MANIFESTING ITSELF WHILE THE OTHER IS SUBDUED. WE ALSO SEE HOW THEY MAY EXIST IN A STATE COMPLEXITY. IN THE FIRST INSTANCE THEY DO NOT COMBINE, IN IN THE OTHER THEY DO AND BECOME `COMPLEX. WE ALSO SEE THE PROPRIETY AND USE OF OBSERVING WHAT TREATMENT HAS BEEN ADMINISTERED TO THE PTIENT. IT IS NOT ALWAYS POSSIBLE TO KNOW WHETHER EACH ONE OF THESE DRUGS HAS ESTABLISHED ITS OWN DISEASE. NOT ECERY DRUG THAT IS ADMINISTERED IS CAPABLE OF ESTABLISHINGA DISEASE. IT IS ALWYS PRUDENT, WHEN SYMPTOMS ARE ONLY PARTIALLY DEVELOPED, AND WHEN DRUG WHICH CAUSED THE SUPPRESSION OF SYMPTOMS IS KNOWN, TO INCLUDE THE ANTIDOTAL RELATION TO THE DRUG WITH REST OF SYMPTOMS;THAT IS TO SAY, SELECT A DRUG WHICH HAS A WELL KNOWN ANTIDOTAL RELATION TO THE DRUG THAT CAUSED THE SUPPRESSION OF THE SYMPTOMS, PROVIDING IT IS ALSO THE MOST SIMILAR OF ALL DRUGS TO THE FEW SYMPTOOMMS THAT ARE PRESENT. IN THAT WAY WE MAKE AS MUCH OF SIMILITUDE AS IS POSSIBLE. THE SIMILAR REMEDY IS MOST LIKEL;Y OF ALL OTHERS TO ANTIDOTE DRUG . DO NOT BE LED ASIDE TO ADMINISTER RIGHT AWAY THE DRUG THAT CAUSED THE TROUBLE. THE PRINCIPLE OF SIMILIA IS FIRST. 43. TOTALLY DIFFERENT, HOWEVER , IS THE RESULT WHEN TWO SIMILAR DISEASES MEET TOGETHER IN THE ORGANISM; THAT IS TO SAY, WHEN TO THE DISEASE ALREADY PRESENT A STRONGER SIMILAR ONOE IS ADDED. IN SUCH CASES WE SEE HOW A CURE CAN BE EFFECTED BY THE OPRERATIONS OF NATURE, AND WE GET A LESSON AS TO HOW MAN OUGHT TO CURE. THEN A REAL CONJUCTION TAKES PLACE, A UNOIN, AS IT WERE, A MARRIAGE, WHICH RESULTS IN THE DISAPPEARANCE OF OLD THINGS AND NEW THINGS COME AND EXISTT IN A STATE ORDER. |