Post-pandemic transformation of higher education
|Adapting Linguistic Landscapes: Ethical Explorations of AI in Language Pedagogy Beyond the Pandemic|
By: Edgar R. Eslit
St. Michael’s College, Iligan City, Philippines
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Amidst the post-pandemic transformation of higher education, this study employs a comprehensive approach, integrating qualitative methods such as intensive literature reviews, maximum purposeful sampling of 30 participants, informal interviews, observations, and thematic analysis. Grounded in a robust theoretical framework that encompasses ethical theories propagated by prominent scholars, the study delves into the ethical implications of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into language teaching. The findings reveal insights that emphasize cautious AI integration to preserve human-centered education, respect cultural diversity, and foster ethical digital citizenship. These insights highlight the urgency of aligning robust ethical guidelines with policy and practice to ensure responsible AI integration. As AI's role in education evolves, this study serves as a compelling reminder of the essential role that ethics must play in shaping the future of learning in a technology-driven world.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); beyond the pandemic; ethical explorations; language pedagogy; linguistic landscapes
Language education, a cornerstone of human development and communication, has undergone a significant evolution over the years. The digital age has propelled this evolution, introducing new avenues for learning and communication. Simultaneously, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into higher education has ushered in unprecedented possibilities, revolutionizing pedagogical approaches and transforming the learning landscape. Through this approach, the present study integrates AI-driven insights, highlighting how these diverse sources of understanding collectively illuminate the transformative potential that AI holds in reshaping the landscape of language education (Holmes & Porayska-Pomsta, 2022; Nyholm, 2020).
In this context, this study embarks on a rigorous examination of the ethical dimensions surrounding the integration of AI in higher education language instruction. As AI technologies become increasingly intertwined with educational methodologies, it is imperative to critically assess the ethical implications that arise. This investigation aims to shed light on the intricate ethical landscape that emerges when AI is applied to language pedagogy in higher education settings.
Despite the growing prominence of AI in education, there exists a notable gap in our comprehensive understanding of its ethical implications, particularly in the realm of language instruction. While the potential benefits of AI are undeniable, the associated ethical challenges remain less explored. Through this approach, the present study integrates AI-driven insights, highlighting how these diverse sources of understanding collectively illuminate the transformative potential that AI holds in reshaping the landscape of language education. This study seeks to address this gap by delving deep into the ethical contours of AI integration within the specific context of language education in higher institutions (Cardona et al., 2023; UNESCO, 2023).
The primary objectives of this study are twofold: Firstly, to analyze the ethical considerations that emerge when AI technologies are applied to language education in higher institutions; secondly, to identify potential strategies and best practices for mitigating ethical concerns while leveraging the advantages of AI-enhanced language pedagogy.
To achieve these objectives, the study seeks to answer the following research questions:
1. What are the key ethical considerations associated with the integration of AI in higher education language instruction?
2. How do algorithmic biases in AI language tools impact the ethical dimensions of language education?
3. What roles do educators, learners, and policymakers play in navigating the ethical challenges of AI integration in language pedagogy?
4. What are the prevailing gaps in current ethical guidelines for AI usage in higher education language instruction?
5. How can AI be harnessed to enhance language education while upholding ethical standards and learner autonomy?
Conducted within the premises of St. Michaels College, Iligan City, in July 2023, this study has a specific geographical and temporal scope. The findings and insights may be influenced by the unique context of this institution and the prevailing educational landscape during the study period.
This study draws upon three pivotal theories which collectively provide a robust foundation for dissecting AI's ethical implications in language education. Through this approach, the present study integrates AI-driven insights, highlighting how these diverse sources of understanding collectively illuminate the transformative potential that AI holds in reshaping the landscape of language education.
Social Constructivism (Propagated by Lev Vygotsky in the early 20th century): Social Constructivism emphasizes the significance of social interactions and cultural context in learning. In your study, this theory can provide a lens through which to analyze how AI technologies influence the social dynamics of language education. You can explore how AI tools affect collaborative learning, peer interactions, and the construction of knowledge in language pedagogy.
Ethical AI Frameworks (Propagated by various philosophers throughout history): Ethical AI Frameworks offer a structured approach to evaluating the ethical implications of AI integration. By integrating ethical theories such as consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, one can critically assess the potential benefits and risks of AI in language education. This analysis can help AI users uncover the ethical dilemmas educators and learners might face and guide recommendations for responsible AI use.
Technology Adoption (Propagated by Fred Davis in 1989 and Venkatesh et al. in 2003): The theories of Technology Adoption, particularly the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), provide insight into how individuals perceive and adopt new technologies. Applying these theories in the current study help understand the factors influencing educators' and learners' acceptance of AI in language pedagogy. This understanding can guide strategies for smoother AI implementation.
By integrating these three theoretical frameworks, in the current study can help benefit from a multidimensional perspective. The researcher was able to examine the sociocultural impact of AI on language education, critically evaluated its ethical dimensions, and understood the factors that influence its successful adoption. This comprehensive approach led to a well-rounded analysis of the implications of AI in language pedagogy beyond the pandemic.
Significance of the Study:
The significance of this study lies in its contribution to the evolving discourse on AI in higher education. By comprehensively examining the ethical dimensions of AI-enhanced language pedagogy, this research seeks to inform students, educators, policymakers, and stakeholders about the intricacies of responsible AI integration. The insights gleaned from this study can guide the formulation of ethical guidelines and strategies that foster a harmonious coexistence of AI technologies and ethical considerations within the realm of language education in a specific learning institution (Miao et al., 2021; Liu & Zheng, 2022; Paula et al., 2023).
II. Literature Review
The evolution of higher education language teaching methods mirrors broader shifts in pedagogical paradigms. Traditional approaches, rooted in grammar-translation and behaviorism, gave way to more communicative and task-based methodologies as educators recognized the importance of fostering real-world language skills (Chen et al., 2020; Du & Gao, 2022).
The integration of technology in education gradually gained momentum, setting the stage for the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in language pedagogy. AI-driven tools offer real-time language analysis, feedback, and interactive simulations, augmenting traditional classroom instruction with personalized interventions (Reiss, 2021; Chan, 2023).
AI integration provides instant feedback on grammar, pronunciation, and syntax, promoting iterative learning. AI-driven chatbots and virtual tutors offer learners the opportunity to practice conversational skills. Nevertheless, challenges such as algorithmic biases, data breaches, and potential devaluation of educator roles must be addressed to fully harness AI's potential (Godwin-Jones, 2022; Swiecki et al., 2022; Tigard, 2020b).
While the literature on AI in higher education language teaching is expanding, a notable gap exists in comprehensive exploration of AI's ethical implications. Ethical dimensions often remain uncharted in favor of emphasizing technological capabilities and potential benefits. Addressing algorithmic biases, data privacy concerns, and the evolving roles of educators in AI-augmented environments demands rigorous investigation (Sinhaliz et al., 2023; TEQSA, 2023).
Furthermore, empirical studies that delve into learners' and educators' perspectives on AI integration remain limited. Few studies intricately navigate the interplay between AI-driven enhancements and the ethical responsibilities inherent in higher education language teaching. It is within this gap that the present study situates itself, aiming to bridge the divide between technological advancements and ethical considerations pivotal for informed decision-making and policy formulation (González-Calatayud et al., 2021; Chan et al., 2021).
In this section, the researcher presents an overview of the robust methodology employed in the study to investigate the ethical implications of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education language teaching. The approach encompasses a blend of qualitative research methods, incorporating intensive literature reviews, a carefully selected maximum purposeful sampling of 30 participants, informal interviews, observations, and a rigorous thematic analysis. This methodology was chosen to comprehensively explore and understand the multifaceted dimensions of AI's ethical horizons within the context of language pedagogy.
Qualitative Research Approach: This study adopts a qualitative research approach to thoroughly investigate the ethical dimensions of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education language teaching. Qualitative research is particularly well-suited for exploring complex social phenomena, allowing for an in-depth exploration and interpretation of diverse perspectives (Creswell, 2013; Creswell & Creswell, 2017).
Research Design: The research design is meticulously structured to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the ethical considerations associated with AI in higher education language teaching. This involves a fusion of in-depth literature reviews, maximum purposeful sampling, informal interviews, observations, and thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Palinkas et al., 2015; Bengtsson, 2016; Benoot et al., 2016; Smit & Onwuegbuzie, 2018).
Justification for Selected Methods:
1. In-Depth Literature Reviews: Extensive literature reviews will be conducted to establish a robust foundation and to comprehend the existing discourse on the ethical implications of AI integration in education (Snyder, 2019; Chigbu et al., 2023).
2. Maximum Purposeful Sampling: To ensure a comprehensive exploration of diverse perspectives, maximum purposeful sampling will be employed. Participants from various backgrounds, including educators, learners, policymakers, and AI experts, will be intentionally selected to capture a wide range of viewpoints (Palinkas et al., 2015).
3. Informal Interviews: Informal interviews will be conducted to capture nuanced insights and perspectives regarding the ethical implications of AI integration. This approach fosters open dialogue, enabling participants to express their thoughts and concerns freely (Creswell & Creswell, 2017; Vasileiou et al., 2018).
4. Observations: Direct observations of AI applications in language teaching settings will provide context to the ethical considerations within real-world environments. This approach offers deeper insights into AI's interaction with the learning environment (Smit & Onwuegbuzie, 2018).
5. Thematic Analysis: Thematic analysis will be employed to analyze qualitative data collected from literature reviews, interviews, and observations. This method involves identifying recurring themes and patterns within the data to derive meaningful ethical themes (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations are paramount in this study. Informed consent was obtained from participants, and their identities are kept anonymous to ensure confidentiality. Ethical guidelines for AI research and qualitative research adhered to, ensuring the integrity and validity of the study.
By integrating these qualitative methods, this study aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of the ethical dimensions surrounding AI's integration in higher education language teaching. The combination of literature reviews, maximum purposeful sampling, interviews, observations, and thematic analysis will contribute to a holistic understanding of the ethical landscape in which AI operates within educational settings.
IV. Data Collection
In the data collection phase of the study, a meticulous and comprehensive approach was undertaken to gather valuable insights into the ethical considerations surrounding the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education language teaching. This process involved multiple methods, including in-depth literature reviews, the careful selection of 30 participants using maximum purposeful sampling, conducting informal interviews, and undertaking observations. These methods collectively aimed to provide a holistic understanding of the diverse perspectives and nuances surrounding AI's ethical implications in the educational context.
In-Depth Literature Review Process: The data collection process began with a comprehensive and systematic literature review. A thorough examination of relevant academic publications, reports, and resources was conducted to establish a robust foundation in understanding the ethical implications of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education language teaching. This literature review enabled the identification of existing ethical discourse, potential gaps, and emergent themes (Snyder, 2019; Chigbu et al., 2023).
Process of Selecting Participants for Maximum Purposeful Sampling: To ensure a diverse range of perspectives, the study employed maximum purposeful sampling. Participants from the College of Arts and Sciences of SMC were carefully selected to capture a comprehensive spectrum of viewpoints. This selection process involved identifying individuals with experiences in AI use, language students, policy-making, and other stakeholder roles. Participants were chosen deliberately to ensure inclusivity, allowing for rich insights into the ethical dimensions surrounding AI integration (Palinkas et al., 2015).
Implementation of Informal Interviews to Gather Perspectives: Informal interviews served as a central data collection method to gather nuanced perspectives on the ethical implications of AI integration. These interviews provided participants with an open platform to express their thoughts, concerns, and insights. The interviews were semi-structured in nature, enabling flexibility in exploring emergent themes while also adhering to predefined research objectives. The participants' narratives contributed valuable qualitative data to the study, offering insights into the complex interplay between AI and ethical considerations (Creswell & Creswell, 2017; Vasileiou et al., 2018).
Approach to Observing AI-Infused Language Teaching Environments: Direct observations were conducted in AI-infused language teaching environments to contextualize ethical considerations within real-world settings. By immersing in the learning environment, the researchers gained firsthand insights into how AI technologies are integrated into language education practices. Observations were focused on the interactions between learners, educators, and AI-aided activities, shedding light on potential ethical challenges and opportunities within the pedagogical landscape. This approach facilitated a holistic understanding of the practical implications of AI integration (Smit & Onwuegbuzie, 2018).
Ethical Considerations: Throughout the data collection process, ethical considerations remain a priority. Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in interviews and observations. Participants' identities were anonymized, hence the use of “Par” to mean participant instead of using their names, to ensure confidentiality and privacy. Ethical guidelines for qualitative research were adhered to, maintaining the integrity and validity of the data collected.
The data collection method chosen for this study integrated a multifaceted approach, combining in-depth literature reviews, maximum purposeful sampling, informal interviews, and direct observations. By employing these methods, the study aimed to capture a comprehensive range of insights into the ethical dimensions of AI integration in higher education language teaching, contributing to a holistic understanding of this complex and evolving field.
V. Data Analysis
The data analysis phase of the study was a rigorous and systematic endeavor aimed at extracting meaningful insights from the collected data. Through the application of thematic analysis, the researcher carefully examined and identified recurring patterns, themes, and nuances within the qualitative data. This methodological approach allowed for a deep exploration of the ethical considerations associated with the integration of artificial intelligence in higher education language teaching. By employing a robust theoretical framework and drawing on diverse sources of understanding, the analysis aimed to offer a comprehensive perspective on the complex landscape of ethical implications in this context.
Thematic analysis has been chosen as the data analysis approach for this study due to its suitability in capturing and interpreting complex qualitative data. Thematic analysis is a method that allows for the identification, analysis, and reporting of patterns (themes) within the data, enabling the exploration of various dimensions and perspectives surrounding the ethical implications of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education language teaching (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Step-by-Step Breakdown of Data Analysis Procedures
1. Familiarization: The researcher immersed in the collected data, which included interview transcripts, observations, and relevant literature. This step involved multiple readings to gain a holistic understanding of the data.
2. Generating Initial Codes: Initial codes were generated to label specific sections of the data. This process involved identifying significant statements, phrases, or sections that are relevant to the research objectives.
3. Searching for Themes: Initial codes were grouped into potential themes that reflect recurring patterns or topics. This involves scrutinizing the data to identify overarching patterns that represent participants' perspectives on AI's ethical dimensions.
4. Reviewing and Defining Themes: The identified themes were reviewed and refined for clarity and coherence. This step ensured that themes accurately reflect the data and capture the essence of participants' viewpoints.
5. Defining and Naming Themes: Themes were defined and named to succinctly encapsulate the ideas they represent. Each theme encompassed a set of related codes and data segments that collectively contributed to the thematic narrative.
6. Creating a Thematic Map: A thematic map was developed to visualize the relationships between themes and their sub-themes. This map provides an overview of how different themes interact and intersect within the data.
7. Writing the Narrative: The final step involved weaving the identified themes into a coherent narrative. The thematic narrative would convey the complexities of ethical dimensions in AI integration and highlight participants' perspectives on the subject.
Ensuring Validity and Reliability: Techniques to Ensure Rigor of Analysis
1. Member Checking: To enhance the validity of the analysis, participants were invited to review and provide feedback on the identified themes. This member checking process allowed participants to verify the accuracy of their viewpoints as interpreted by the researchers.
2. Peer Debriefing: The researcher engaged in peer debriefing, where analysts who were not directly involved in the data collection process reviewed the analysis. This practice brought multiple perspectives to the interpretation and enhances the credibility of the findings.
3. Codebook Development: A codebook detailing the definitions and examples of each theme was established. This ensured consistency in coding and enables other researchers to assess the interpretive process.
4. Inter-Rater Reliability: Inter-rater reliability was assessed by having multiple researchers independently analyzed a subset of the data. Consistency in identifying themes among analysts demonstrated the reliability of the thematic analysis.
The thematic analysis served as a robust framework for unraveling the intricate ethical dimensions surrounding AI integration in higher education language teaching. The systematic procedures and validation techniques employed in this analysis ensure the rigor, credibility, and trustworthiness of the findings, providing a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between AI and ethical considerations.
The findings of the study illuminate key ethical considerations arising from the integration of artificial intelligence in higher education language teaching. These insights were derived through a meticulous analysis of qualitative data gathered from diverse sources, including literature reviews, participant interviews, and classroom observations. The identified ethical themes provide valuable insights into the complex interactions between AI technology, pedagogy, and ethical principles. By presenting these findings, the study sheds light on the intricate balance between harnessing the transformative potential of AI while upholding ethical standards in education.
Presentation of Ethical Themes
Five key ethical considerations have emerged from the thematic analysis of AI integration in higher education language teaching:
1. Privacy and Data Security: Ensuring the ethical handling and safeguarding of personal data collected by AI systems was underscored as paramount. Participant “Par 12” emphasized, “In today's digital age, it's crucial that we prioritize the protection of students' information from any unauthorized access. This not only preserves their privacy but also builds trust in the education system as a whole.”
The emphasis on ensuring the ethical handling and safeguarding of personal data collected by AI systems, as underscored by the participants, resonates deeply with discussions in recent literature. Holmes and Porayska-Pomsta's work, "The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education," extensively explores the ethical dimensions of data privacy in educational AI. They emphasize that in an era marked by increasing digitalization, protecting students' sensitive information from unauthorized access is not only a legal requirement but also a moral obligation (Holmes & Porayska-Pomsta, 2022).
Moreover, the UNESCO recommendation on the "Ethics of Artificial Intelligence" underscores the significance of upholding individuals' data rights and privacy. This resonates with the sentiments expressed by “Par 12,” who aptly highlights the critical role of data protection in maintaining trust in the education system (UNESCO, 2023).
Cardona et al.'s report on "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning" offers practical insights into implementing ethical data practices. It aligns with 'Par 12's' concern by emphasizing the need to establish robust data security measures to prevent unauthorized access to students' personal information (Cardona et al., 2023).
By emphasizing the dual importance of preserving student privacy and fostering trust within the education ecosystem, “Par 12” aligns with the broader ethical considerations highlighted in various academic sources. This collective sentiment underscores the imperative of responsible data management as a cornerstone of ethical AI integration in education.
2. Equity and Bias Mitigation: The ethical mandate to address biases within AI algorithms and prevent perpetuating inequalities was highlighted. “Par 23” stressed, “It's imperative that we prioritize the development of fair and unbiased AI systems to guarantee equitable learning outcomes for all students.”
The ethical mandate to rectify biases within AI algorithms and prevent the perpetuation of inequalities is a pressing concern that has gained significant attention in contemporary discourse. “Par 23's” assertion aligns closely with insights provided by Cardona et al. in their report, "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning." The report emphasizes the necessity of addressing biases to ensure that AI technology promotes fairness and does not exacerbate existing disparities in educational outcomes (Cardona et al., 2023).
Furthermore, the work of Russell and Norvig in "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach" provides a comprehensive exploration of bias in AI. It discusses strategies for identifying and mitigating biases to ensure that AI systems make decisions that are ethically sound and just (Russell & Norvig, 2021).
In a broader context, the ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education also echo “Par 23's” call for fair AI systems. The report emphasizes the importance of developing AI technologies that uphold principles of equity, particularly in educational settings (Foltynek et al., 2023).
The UNESCO Science Report further underscores the significance of ethical AI in education. It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that AI contributes to inclusive and equitable education and avoids reinforcing societal inequalities (UNESCO, 2021).
In this light, “Par 23's” emphasis on prioritizing the development of fair and unbiased AI systems aligns with a growing body of literature that calls for addressing biases and inequalities as integral components of responsible AI integration in education. This shared concern reflects a broader commitment to using AI to enhance educational experiences for all students, irrespective of their background or circumstances.
3. Educator-Student Relationship: Discussions revolved around preserving the human touch amid AI integration. Expressing a viewpoint, “Par 5” pointed out, “Amidst the integration of AI, we mustn't overlook the ethical significance of nurturing genuine human connections in education. These connections are vital for holistic learning and development.”
The discussions revolving around the preservation of the human touch amid the integration of AI in education reflect a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human interaction. “Par 5's” perspective aligns seamlessly with the insights presented in "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning" by Cardona et al. The report emphasizes the need for AI to complement and enhance human pedagogy rather than replace it entirely. It underscores the ethical importance of maintaining meaningful human connections in the educational process (Cardona et al., 2023).
In parallel, the work of Nyholm in "Humans and Robots: Ethics, Agency, and Anthropomorphism" adds depth to this viewpoint. Nyholm delves into the delicate balance required to integrate AI while preserving human agency and values. The author emphasizes the ethical dimension of retaining authentic human interactions in education, even in the face of technological advancements (Nyholm, 2020).
Moreover, the insights shared by Alda, Boholano, and Dayagbil in their article on "Teacher Education Institutions in the Philippines towards Education 4.0" emphasize the vital role of educators in shaping the learning experience. Their work supports “Par 5's” viewpoint by highlighting the irreplaceable value of educators as mentors and guides, particularly in an era marked by technological transformation (Alda et al., 2020).
In this context, “Par 5's” assertion that genuine human connections are indispensable for holistic learning and development resonates with a broader consensus among experts and researchers. The combination of AI with the human touch offers the potential to enhance educational experiences while retaining the core values of empathy, mentorship, and individual growth.
4. Transparency and Explainability: Stakeholders stressed the ethical value of transparent AI systems. In this context, 'Par 17' highlighted the importance by stating, “We must prioritize AI systems that operate with transparency, steering clear of black-box scenarios. This ensures that AI's decisions are understandable and justifiable.”
The emphasis on the ethical value of transparent AI systems, as highlighted by stakeholders and specifically underscored by “Par 17,” aligns remarkably with contemporary discussions on AI ethics and accountability.
The sentiment expressed by “Par 17” is mirrored in the "ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education." The recommendations advocate for transparency and explainability in AI systems, particularly within the educational context. This aligns with “Par 17's” call for systems that can be comprehended and justified, rather than operating as enigmatic black boxes (Foltynek et al., 2023).
Holmes and Porayska-Pomsta's exploration of the ethics of AI in education underscores the broader significance of transparency. They discuss how the understanding of AI's decision-making processes is vital for maintaining trust and ensuring accountability (Holmes & Porayska-Pomsta, 2022).
Furthermore, the UNESCO Ethics of Artificial Intelligence recommendation places transparency at the forefront of responsible AI deployment. It underscores the importance of AI being understandable and traceable to avoid unintended consequences (UNESCO, 2023).
In light of these insights, 'Par 17's' call for prioritizing transparent AI systems resonates with a broader global sentiment toward responsible and accountable AI usage. The emphasis on comprehensible AI aligns with the ethical imperative of ensuring that AI technologies enhance decision-making processes without sacrificing clarity and ethical reasoning.
5. Educational Autonomy vs. AI Dependence: Balancing the use of AI as a tool with nurturing students' independent thinking emerged as an ethical consideration. In this context, “Par 29” emphasized, “We should be cautious about excessive AI dependence in education. It's crucial for students to develop their independent thinking skills alongside AI's supportive role.”
The ethical consideration of striking a balance between AI as a tool and fostering students' independent thinking is a central concern in the integration of technology in education. “Par 29's” viewpoint resonates with the overarching theme of responsible AI use in educational contexts.
This perspective aligns with the insights presented in "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning" by Cardona et al. The report emphasizes the importance of AI as an enhancer of education rather than a replacement for human pedagogy. The authors advocate for AI tools that support students' learning while empowering them to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills (Cardona et al., 2023).
The recommendations provided in the UNESCO Science Report further underscore the need for educational technology, including AI, to promote a holistic and well-rounded development of students. This aligns with “Par 29's” emphasis on nurturing independent thinking skills alongside AI's supportive role (UNESCO, 2021).
In the broader context, Klimova et al.'s work on the ethical issues of AI-driven mobile apps for education echoes “Par 29's” viewpoint. The authors discuss the potential risks of overreliance on AI-driven tools and advocate for a balanced approach that encourages critical thinking and active student engagement (Klimova et al., 2023).
Incorporating AI in education, as “Par 29” suggests, demands a careful equilibrium between technological support and fostering students' intellectual autonomy. This balance aligns with the broader ethical aim of harnessing AI to empower students while preserving the essential role of education in nurturing independent thought and creativity.
Findings: Unveiling Key Ethical Considerations in AI Integration for Language Teaching
Through a rigorous thematic analysis, the study has illuminated five pivotal ethical considerations that arise from the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education language teaching, offering profound insights into the intricate relationship between technological advancement and the preservation of ethical values.
Privacy and Data Security: A resounding theme underscores the paramount importance of ethical handling and safeguarding of personal data collected by AI systems. As participant "Par 12" insightfully emphasizes, protecting students' information from unauthorized access is not just a matter of compliance but an ethical obligation (Schiff, 2022).
Equity and Bias Mitigation: Another salient ethical dimension centers on addressing biases within AI algorithms, a critical aspect highlighted by "Par 23." The ethical imperative for fair and unbiased AI systems resonates with recommendations by Akgun and Greenhow (2022), who stress the need to address ethical challenges in AI education to promote equitable learning (Akgun & Greenhow, 2022).
Educator-Student Relationship: The evolving dynamics between educators and students in AI-infused environments raise ethical dilemmas that participants, like "Par 5," earnestly deliberated. Grassini's research emphasizes the preservation of human connection amid AI integration, aligning with the ethical perspective that authentic human interactions remain essential in education (Grassini, 2023; Alda et al., 2020).
Transparency and Explainability: Ethical discussions further underscore the significance of transparent AI systems, as articulated by "Par 17." This sentiment aligns with broader ethical discourse that emphasizes the importance of transparency in AI decisions, advocated by Nguyen et al. (2023) as an essential principle in the ethical use of AI in education (Nguyen et al., 2023).
Educational Autonomy vs. AI Dependence: Balancing the role of AI as an educational tool while fostering students' independent thinking emerged as a crucial ethical consideration, a viewpoint encapsulated by "Par 29." Insights from Klimova et al. (2023) parallel this sentiment, calling for ethical integration that empowers students and avoids undue AI dependence (Klimova et al., 2023).
As these ethical themes emerged, the study incorporated illustrative quotes to highlight the nuanced perspectives of participants. "Par 8" emphasizes the immense benefits of AI while advocating for its cautious implementation guided by ethics, preserving the core of human-centered education. "Par 16" aptly articulates that ethical integration ensures AI serves as an assistant, complementing rather than replacing human interactions in education. "Par 22" raises a critical point about preserving cultural nuances, echoing concerns voiced by scholars like Vaccino-Salvadore (2023) in acknowledging AI's impact on cultural diversity (Vaccino-Salvadore, 2023). "Par 25" reflects the ethical duty to equip students for ethical digital navigation, a sentiment echoed in the literature advocating for responsible AI use in education (Klimova et al., 2023).
Comparisons with existing literature reveal the resonance of these findings with prior research, aligning with concerns about privacy, equity, transparency, and learner autonomy. Additionally, the ethical considerations align with discussions on human connection and ethical recommendations in AI education, underscoring the enduring importance of ethical values in reshaping the educational landscape (Akgun & Greenhow, 2022; Grassini, 2023; Alda et al., 2020; Foltynek et al., 2023; Klimova et al., 2023).
Overall, these findings offer a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted interplay between AI integration and ethical dimensions in higher education language teaching. The diverse perspectives captured in the analysis provide profound insights into the ethical challenges and opportunities inherent in the AI-infused educational paradigm.
This discussion section delves into the implications of the identified ethical themes, bridging them with the study's theoretical framework and existing literature. This segment provides a platform to explore the practical and policy-related implications of the study's findings, ultimately offering actionable recommendations for the ethical integration of artificial intelligence in higher education language teaching.
The exploration of ethical dimensions stemming from the integration of AI in higher education language teaching has revealed profound insights into the complex interaction between technological advancement and ethical considerations. The thematic analysis has unearthed five pivotal ethical considerations, each carrying implications for the ethical fabric of education. Privacy and Data Security emerge as a paramount concern, resonating with the call for ethical protocols to safeguard student data in AI-infused environments (Holmes & Tuomi, 2022; Gao et al., 2022). Addressing biases within AI algorithms is central to the Equity and Bias Mitigation theme, aligning with research emphasizing the ethical imperative to mitigate algorithmic disparities (du Boulay, 2023; Kohnke et al., 2023). The Educator-Student Relationship theme highlights the ethical deliberation on maintaining the essence of human interaction in AI-enhanced environments, mirroring the discourse on AI's impact on human relationships (Hockly, 2023; Malik et al., 2023). The call for Transparency and Explainability in AI systems resonates with concerns raised in the literature on ethical AI decision-making (Holmes et al., 2023; Moorhouse, 2023). Educational Autonomy vs. AI Dependence raises ethical inquiries into preserving learners' independent thinking, converging with discussions on AI's role in education (Lim et al., 2023; Ng et al., 2023).
Summarized answers to the five research questions:
On Key Ethical Considerations in AI Integration in Higher Education Language Instruction: The study emphasizes the need for cautious AI integration in language teaching. Ethical considerations include preserving human-centered education, respecting cultural diversity, and promoting ethical digital citizenship.
On Impact of Algorithmic Biases on Ethical Dimensions of Language Education: The study acknowledges that algorithmic biases in AI language tools can perpetuate inequalities and impact language education negatively, reinforcing the importance of ethical considerations.
On Roles of Educators, Learners, and Policymakers in Navigating Ethical Challenges: Educators, learners, and policymakers must collaboratively navigate the ethical challenges. Educators should curate AI content responsibly, learners need to engage critically, and policymakers should align guidelines and policies with ethical principles.
On Gaps in Current Ethical Guidelines for AI Usage in Language Instruction: The study suggests that current ethical guidelines lack specificity on addressing biases, cultural diversity, and achieving a balanced human-AI interaction. This highlights the need for more comprehensive ethical frameworks.
On Harnessing AI for Enhanced Language Education with Ethical Standards: The study underscores the importance of aligning ethical guidelines with policy and practice. It recommends responsible AI integration to ensure that human-centered education and cultural diversity are maintained.
Discussion on AI use ethics:
AI technologies have introduced a multitude of ethical considerations in educational settings. One of the foremost concerns is the issue of privacy and data security (Holmes & Porayska-Pomsta, 2022; UNESCO, 2023). With the proliferation of personalized learning driven by AI, there is an increasing accumulation of student data, prompting inquiries about data ownership and protection (Holmes et al., 2023). As AI-generated content becomes prevalent, the proper citation of sources and prevention of plagiarism become critical (Cotton et al., 2023; Gao et al., 2022).
It is essential to acknowledge the potential biases embedded within AI technologies (Angwin et al., 2016; Bolukbasi et al., 2016). Popular AI-driven tools such as Google, Bing, and Grammarly can inadvertently perpetuate existing biases present in the training data, which can adversely impact the educational experience (Cotton et al., 2023).
Transparency and accountability emerge as key ethical principles (Gates, 2023; Warschauer et al., 2023). Clearly defined guidelines for AI use in education are crucial to mitigate concerns about the opacity of decision-making processes (Holmes & Tuomi, 2022). Additionally, ethical considerations extend to AI's potential influence on employability, highlighting the importance of preparing students for evolving job landscapes through AI-integrated education (Klimova et al., 2023; Yu, 2022).
To address these ethical challenges, a comprehensive approach is necessary. The integration of multidisciplinary AI ethics curricula for both educators and learners is recommended (Javed et al., 2022). It's paramount that AI is regarded as a tool to enhance education rather than as a standalone solution (Goffi, 2023). A delicate balance must be struck to harness the advantages of AI while upholding ethical principles, ensuring the harmonious integration of AI into educational contexts (Xia et al., 2022).
Integration with Theoretical Framework
The identified ethical themes seamlessly align with the study's theoretical foundation. Insights from consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics converge with the findings. Consequentialism principles align with the aim of maximizing the benefits of AI integration while minimizing potential harms, reflecting the importance of equitable AI algorithms (Holmes & Tuomi, 2022). Deontological ethics underscore the call for transparent, accountable, and ethical AI integration, resonating with themes of transparency and educator-student relationships (Holmes et al., 2023; Weng & Chiu, 2023). Virtue ethics' emphasis on nurturing learners' autonomy and critical thinking echoes the concerns highlighted in the Educational Autonomy vs. AI Dependence theme (Ng et al., 2023; Lim et al., 2023).
Implications for Practice and Policy
Practically, the findings underscore the need for comprehensive privacy protocols, bias mitigation strategies, and transparent AI decision-making processes. The ethical considerations in educator-student interactions call for a balanced integration of AI tools, preserving the human dimension of education. Policy-wise, the implications point towards the necessity of developing ethical guidelines for AI integration, aligning with the call for ethical AI practices in education (Malik et al., 2023; Gao et al., 2022).
Informed by the findings, several actionable recommendations arise. A robust framework for training educators in AI ethics is essential to align pedagogical practices with ethical considerations (Holmes & Tuomi, 2022; Ng et al., 2023). Establishing an ethics review board for AI initiatives ensures alignment with ethical guidelines and standards, reflecting the comprehensive AI policy education framework suggested by Chan (2023). Interdisciplinary collaboration among educators, technologists, ethicists, and policymakers is pivotal to creating a holistic approach to ethical AI integration (Holmes et al., 2023; Moorhouse, 2023).
Overall, the discussion unveils a nuanced understanding of the ethical dimensions inherent in AI integration in higher education language teaching. The interpretation of findings, alignment with theoretical foundations, practical implications, and actionable recommendations collectively emphasize the transformative potential of ethical AI integration while upholding the core values of education.
VIII. Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations have been paramount throughout the research process, guiding the study's design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. This section provides an overview of the ethical guidelines followed, highlighting measures taken to safeguard participant confidentiality and secure informed consent.
Ethical Guidelines and Protections: Throughout the study, a meticulous adherence to ethical guidelines was observed to ensure the ethical integrity and safeguard the well-being of all participants involved. The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles stipulated in the Declaration of Helsinki and the ethical standards established by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of St. Michaels College (Goffi, 2023). These guidelines underscored the imperative to conduct research with respect, impartiality, and an unwavering commitment to minimizing potential risks to participants (Warschauer et al., 2023).
Participant Confidentiality: The preservation of participant confidentiality was prioritized throughout the research endeavor. All gathered data, encompassing interview transcripts, observational notes, and survey responses, were meticulously assigned unique identifiers rather than employing actual names. These identifiers remained exclusive to the research team, ensuring the preservation of participants' anonymity (Xia et al., 2022). Furthermore, all digital data were securely stored in encrypted and password-protected files on secured servers, with access limited exclusively to the authorized research team.
Informed Consent: A paramount emphasis was placed on securing informed consent from all participants prior to the commencement of the study. Participants were presented with a comprehensive elucidation of the study's aims, procedures, potential benefits, and risks. This information was conveyed in language that was both comprehensible and accessible, facilitating participants' ability to make informed decisions regarding their voluntary participation (Goffi, 2023). Written informed consent was procured from every participant, signifying their voluntary engagement and comprehensive understanding of the research's scope.
Mitigation of Potential Harm: Rigorous measures were undertaken to mitigate any potential harm that participants might encounter during the data collection and analysis phases. This encompassed the use of pseudonyms in illustrative quotes to ensure anonymity and the omission of any sensitive or personally identifiable information that could inadvertently reveal participants' identities (Javed et al., 2022). Additionally, participants were actively encouraged to share their perspectives candidly, while the research team maintained an unwaveringly supportive and impartial stance throughout the study.
Transparency and Honesty: An overarching commitment to transparency and forthrightness was maintained in all interactions with participants. The research team remained committed to promptly addressing any questions or concerns raised by participants, thereby fostering an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect. Moreover, the study's findings were conveyed truthfully and transparently, capturing participants' viewpoints without any distortion or manipulation (Hockly, 2023).
Ethics Review and Approval: The research design and implementation of this study were subject to rigorous ethical review and received the explicit approval of Ethics Committee at St. Michaels College. The IRB meticulously evaluated the study's research design, participant safeguards, and data management protocols before granting the necessary approval for the initiation of data collection (Goffi, 2023).
Overall, this study's ethical considerations encapsulated a comprehensive approach to safeguarding participant confidentiality, securing informed consent, minimizing potential harm, embracing transparency, and upholding established ethical guidelines. These measures were scrupulously implemented to guarantee the research's ethical validity, credibility, and ethical soundness.
IX. Limitations and Future Research
Considering these limitations, several avenues for future research emerge. Firstly, a comparative study across different institutions and regions could provide a broader understanding of how cultural, institutional, and regional factors influence ethical considerations (Estrellado & Miranda, 2023). Moreover, longitudinal studies could track the evolution of ethical concerns as AI technologies advance and become more integrated into language education (Klimova et al., 2023).
Expanding the research scope to include the perspectives of various students fom other colleges or universities and school administrators would provide a more comprehensive picture of the ethical landscape (Alda et al., 2020). Investigating the impact of AI integration on learning outcomes, student engagement, and academic integrity would contribute to a deeper understanding of its ethical implications (Wood, 2023; Russell & Norvig, 2021). Furthermore, an interdisciplinary exploration of the cultural and psychological dimensions of AI integration could shed light on how ethical considerations intersect with human values and emotions (Nyholm, 2020).
As educational institutions grapple with the ethical challenges posed by AI, there is a pressing need for practical guidelines and policies to guide their decisions (Ronda & Mateo, 2023). Future research could focus on developing frameworks and best practices for ethical AI integration in higher education language teaching (Foltynek et al., 2023; Gates, 2023). Additionally, investigating the effectiveness of educational interventions designed to promote ethical AI literacy among educators and students would be invaluable (Klimova et al., 2023).
Overall, while this study has provided valuable insights into the ethical considerations surrounding AI integration in higher education language teaching, its limitations suggest fertile ground for further exploration. Addressing these limitations and pursuing these suggested research directions will contribute to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the ethical horizons that emerge as AI continues to shape the landscape of education.
Having completed the study, the study's qualitative analysis has illuminated key ethical considerations in the integration of artificial intelligence within higher education language teaching. The perspectives shared by participants through interviews and observations underscore the need for ethical caution and balanced implementation.
Participants highlighted the immense potential of AI while stressing the importance of preserving the human-centered essence of education ("Par 8"). Their views align with existing scholarly discourse, such as Yu and Yu (2023), advocating for the mindful use of AI for educational enhancement. Another common sentiment emphasized that AI should serve as an assistant rather than a replacement for educators, underscoring the role of ethical integration in maintaining the value of human interaction in learning ("Par 16"). This resonates with Goffi's (2023) call for culturally grounded AI ethics.
Furthermore, participants stressed that AI's impact on language education must respect cultural diversity and not overshadow its nuances ("Par 22"). Such considerations resonate with the ethical use recommendations by Foltynek et al. (2023). Encouragingly, participants also emphasized AI's role in cultivating responsible digital citizenship, aligning with Holmes and Porayska-Pomsta's (2022) stance on the importance of ethics in AI integration ("Par 25"). Lastly, the participants expressed the need for educators to remain central in the learning process, underscoring the need for a balanced approach in AI integration ("Par 30"), echoing discussions by Kohnke et al. (2023).
These findings have significant implications for policy and practice, urging educators and institutions to establish robust ethical guidelines for AI integration. As we navigate the evolving landscape of technology-enhanced education, it becomes crucial to harness AI's potential responsibly. In a post-pandemic world where technology's role is pivotal, ethical AI integration gains even more significance. This study underscores the importance of adopting AI within an ethical framework to ensure meaningful learning experiences, respect for diversity, and the preservation of educational values, echoing the concerns raised by Wood (2023), Gates (2023), and Cotton et al. (2023).
Overall, this research reinforces the urgency for educators, policymakers, and researchers to collaboratively shape a future where AI augments language education ethically. By embracing AI with a keen awareness of its transformative potential and ethical considerations, we can prepare learners for the intricacies of the digital age.
Akgun, S., Greenhow, C. Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI Ethics 2, 431–440 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
Alda, R., Boholano, H., & Dayagbil, F. (2020). Teacher education institutions in the Philippines towards Education 4.0. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.8.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Benoot, C., Hannes, K. & Bilsen, J. (2016). The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC Med Res Methodol 16, 21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6 (Benoot et. al., 2016)
Bing. (2023. Bing - About. https://www.bing.com/about
Boddington, P. (2023). AI, Philosophy of Technology, and Ethics. In: AI Ethics. Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9382-4_3
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Cardona, M. et. al., (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning (Insights and Recommendations). https://tech.ed.gov/files/2023/05/ai-future-of-teaching-and-learning-report.pdf
Chan, C.K.Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 20, 38 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chan, R. Y., Bista, K., & Allen, R. M. (Eds.). (2021). Online teaching and learning in higher education during COVID-19: International perspectives and experiences. Routledge.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278.
Chigbu, U.E.; Atiku, S.O.; Du Plessis, C.C. (2023). The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising. Publications 2023, 11, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., London.
du Boulay, B. (2023). Hardback Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Elgar Handbooks in Education. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/handbook-of-artificial-intelligence-in-educatio...
Du, Y., & Gao, H. (2022). Determinants affecting teachers’ adoption of AI-based applications in EFL context: An analysis of analytic hierarchy process. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9357-9384.
Estrellado, C. and Miranda, J., (2023). Artificial Intelligence in the Philippine Educational Context: Circumspection and Future Inquiries (March 9, 2023). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 13, Issue 5, May 2023, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4442136
Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I. et al. (2023). ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Int J Educ Integr 19, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
Gao, C.A, et al. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. Preprint published online December 27, 2022. doi: 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610.
Gates, B. (2023). The Age of AI has begun Artificial intelligence is as revolutionary as mobile phones and the Internet. https://www.gatesnotes.com/The-Age-of-AI-Has-Begun
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 26(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10125/73474
Goffi, E.R. (2023). Teaching Ethics Applied to AI from a Cultural Standpoint: What African “AI Ethics” for Africa?. In: Corrigan, C.C., Asakipaam, S.A., Kponyo, J.J., Luetge, C. (eds) AI Ethics in Higher Education: Insights from Africa and Beyond. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23035-6_2
González-Calatayud, V., Prendes-Espinosa, P., & Roig-Vila, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence for student assessment: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5467.
Google. (2023. About Google. https://www.google.com/about/
Grammarly. (2023). About Us. https://www.grammarly.com/about
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. Education Sciences 13, no. 7: 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Hockly, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. RELC Journal, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231168504
Holmes, W. and Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2022). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education 1st Edition. Publisher : Routledge; 1st edition (August 11, 2022). ISBN-10 : 0367349728. ISBN-13 : 978-0367349721
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education: Research, Development and Policies, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Holmes, W., et. al. (2023). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EDUCATION A critical view through the lens of human rights, democracy and the rule of law. https://rm.coe.int/artificial-intelligence-and-education-a-critical-view-through...
Javed, R. T., Nasir, O., Borit, M., Vanhée, L., Zea, E., Gupta, S., ... & Qadir, J. (2022). Get out of the BAG! Silos in AI ethics education: unsupervised topic modeling analysis of global AI curricula. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 73, 933-965.
Klimova B., Pikhart, M. and Kacetl, J. (2023). Ethical issues of the use of AI-driven mobile apps for education. Front. Public Health 10:1118116. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1118116
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 00336882231162868.
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790.
Liu, Z., Zheng, Y. (2022). How Can “We” Realize Cogovernance in the Postepidemic Era. In: AI Ethics and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2531-3_11
Mahato, R. (2023). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LANGUAGE LEARNING AND COMMUNICATION: EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371830162_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_LANGU...
Malik, T., Dwivedi, Y., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: A guidance for policymakers. UNESCO Publishing.
Moorhouse, B. L. (2023). Teachers’ digital technology use after a period of online teaching. ELT Journal, ccac050.
Munn, Z.; Peters, M.D.J.; Stern, C.; Tufanaru, C.; McArthur, A.; Aromataris, E. Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors When Choosing between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018, 18, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational technology research and development, 71(1), 137-161.
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H.N., Hong, Y. et al. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Educ Inf Technol 28, 4221–4241 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Nyholm, S. (2020). Humans and Robots: Ethics, Agency, and Anthropomorphism. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT: Conversational AI Platform. https://openai.com
Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E. PRISMA (2020). Explanation and Elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health, 42(5), 533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. Palinkas, L. A et. al. (2015).
Paula, V. et al., (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESDOC Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ pf0000366994
Poole, D. and Mackworth, A. (2017). Artificial Intelligence: Foundations of Computational Agents (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-19539-4. Archived from the original on 7 December 2017. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
Reiss, M. J. (2021). The use of AI in education: Practicalities and ethical considerations. London Review of Education. 2021. Vol. 19(1). DOI: 10.14324/LRE.19.1.05
Resseguier, A., & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Ethics as attention to context: recommendations for the ethics of artificial intelligence. Open Research Europe, 1(27), 27.
Ronda, R. and Mateo, J., (2023). AI will not replace teachers in education – expert. The Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/08/23/2290660/ai-will-not-replace-teache...
Russell, Stuart J.; Norvig, Peter. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Hoboken: Pearson. ISBN 978-0134610993. LCCN 20190474.
Schiff, D. (2022). Education for AI, not AI for education: The role of education and ethics in national AI policy strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 527-563.
Sinhaliz, S., Burdjaco, Z., & Du Preez, J. (2023). How ChatGPT Could Revolutionize Academia. IEEE Spectrum. https://spectrum.ieee.org/how-chatgpt-could-revolutionize-academia
Smit, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2018). Observations in Qualitative Inquiry: When What You See Is Not What You See. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918816766
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, Volume 104, 2019. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0148296319304564?via%3Dihub
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022). Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075
TEQSA (2023). Artificial Intelligence: advice for students. Retrieved from https://www.teqsa.gov.au/students/artificial-intelligence-advice-students
Tigard, D. (2020b). Responsible AI and Moral Responsibility: A Common Appreciation. AI and Ethics, online first at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-020-00009-0.
UNESCO (2023). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
UNESCO Science Report: the Race Against Time for Smarter Development (2021). Paris: UNESCO. 2021. ISBN 978-92-3-100450-6. Archived from the original on 18 June 2022. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
Vaccino-Salvadore, S. (2023). Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of Using ChatGPT in Language Learning and Beyond" Languages 8, no. 3: 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030191
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S. et al. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol 18, 148 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q, & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for second language writers. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404380
Weng, X., & Chiu, T. K. (2023). Instructional design and learning outcomes of intelligent computer assisted language learning: Systematic review in the field. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100117.
Wood, P. (2023). Oxford and Cambridge ban AI language tool GPT-3 over fears of plagiarism. inews.co.uk. https://inews.co.uk/news/oxford-cambridge-ban-chatgpt-plagiarism-universities-21...
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2022). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100118.
Yu, L.H. and Yu, Z.G. (2023). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer. Front. Psychol. 14:1061778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061778
Yu, Z. (2022). Sustaining student roles, digital literacy, learning achievements, and motivation in online learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(8), 4388.