This week: The Manichean Fallacy Edited by: Max Griffin đłď¸âđ  
More Newsletters By This Editor 
 
1. About this Newsletter
2. A Word from our Sponsor
3. Letter from the Editor
4. Editor's Picks
5. A Word from Writing.Com
6. Ask & Answer
7. Removal instructions
| We all have reasons to come to a place like Writing.Com. For me, it's always been you, the members. My life is richer for reading your stories. My writing is better for receiving your wisdom. Writing this column can't repay the debt I owe, but it's my way saying "Thank you," by sharing some of what I've learned. I hope you enjoy what I've got to offer. |
| ASIN: 1542722411 |
|
Amazon's Price: $ 12.99
|
|
When we write fiction, we create fictional characters. Hitchcock famously said that the audience cares about the characters, while the plot is there to give the characters something to care about.
In order for the audience to care about the characters, our words need to breathe life into imaginary people. We do this by showing them interacting with the fictional world, including other people in that world. They need to act, speak, and think in ways that readers find credible. The more tools authors have in this creative process, the better. The Emotional Thesaurus , for example, is an invaluable tool that provides physical and emotional markers for emotions. Anything that provides a deeper understanding of people and their behaviors is a potentially useful tool for the fiction author.
Primal World Beliefs
Which brings us to the topic of this monthâs newsletter. The most recent issue of Scientific American includes an article about primal world beliefs. The article summarizes the findings of an ongoing psychological study that claims to have identified twenty-six primal world beliefs, organized in dualistic pairings. These include broad world views like âthe world is enticing/dull,â or âthe world is safe/dangerous,â or âthe world is alive/mechanistic.â Most of the other twenty-three primal world beliefs fall into one of these three basic categories, and the combination of all twenty-six primal world beliefs summarizes whether oneâs overall view is that the world is âgoodâ or âbad.â The dualities roughly describe views that give rise to overall "optimistic/pessimistic" outlooks. You can take the survey (link below) and find out what it says about you. Itâs worth the time.
This is useful to fiction authors because it can help you construct a credible and consistent character. People will hold a mix of world views, so making a credible character will not be âpure,â but rather will exhibit a mix of traits. If you create a bio for your characters as part of writing your novel, listing some of these traits could be helpful. It could also be helpful in terms of constructing oppositional traits for protagonists and antagonists, as well as providing a potential basis for common ground.
This tool, like most tools, is imperfect. Consider the pairing âthe world is alive/mechanistic.â Some of the questions on the survey asked the specific question "do you think the world is mechanistic or alive." I couldnât answer because the proposed dualism is, in my view, meaningless. The world is neither of these things. Even worse, the questions leave undefined what âworldâ we are talking about. Is the world in question the physical world, or is it the cultural and social world? I was thinking of the physical world when I read the question, but others might think of the political world, or the cultural world, or Earthâs biome. Absent a definition, the question itself lacks meaning.
The question of whether or not physics--which is how I read it--is âmechanisticâ is, however, resolved. This was the subject of a famous debate between Einstein and Heisenberg at the 1927 Solvay Conference. Einstein took the position that probability had no role in physics except as an imperfect way to estimate the effect of unknown and hidden variablesâhis view was mechanistic. Heisenbergâs uncertainty principle, on the other hand, is famous for Schrodinger's cat thatâs both dead and alive until the box is opened. Bellâs inequality and the experiments it inspired have resolved this debate in Heisenbergâs favor. God, if she exists, does indeed play dice with the universe.
Neither Einstein nor Heisenberg argued that the universe was âalive,â whatever that might mean. Definitions, again. The Devil is in the details. Or God, depending on your point of view.
Manichaean Fallacy
We'll now turn to the notion of dualism. Each of the twenty-six âprimal world viewsâ are expressed as an either/or dualism. In the âalive/mechanisticâ primal view, the dualism isnât even remotely reality based if the world in question is the physical world. Itâs a duality only for the uninformedânot that I expect most people to know about the Solvay conference or Bellâs inequality. But all of the âprimal world viewsâ are dualistic, and that leads to the Manichean Fallacy of the title.
At one time, Manichaeism was one of the most wide-spread religions in the world. Founded in the third century by its prophet, Mani, it spread outward from the Sassanian empire as far west as the Roman Empire and east as China. Mani taught an elaborate dualistic cosmology which saw the world as a struggle between light and darkness, between good and evil. It was a syncretic religion in that it combined aspects of Gnosticism, Christianity, Judaism, and Buddhism, all of which would have been present in Sassanian empire, which roughly corresponded to todayâs Iran and Iraq. It thrived from the third to seventh centuries, but had largely disappeared by the fourteenth century, although allegedly adherents still exist in southern China.
The dualism that formed the basis of the religion has had influence throughout history. Augustine of Hippo was a Manichaean before converting to Christianity, for example. The Cathars in medieval France had a dualistic theology that may have been Manichean in origin. Modern-day examples of dualistic world views are left as an easy exercise for the reader.
The âManichaean Fallacyâ refers to the religionâs dualistic premise, which sees the world through the lens of polar opposites, like âdayâ and ânight,â or âspiritualâ and âmaterial,â or âgoodâ and âevil.â Itâs a fallacy because a dualistic worldview ignores the boundaries between these opposites, places which are not purely one or the other. Dusk and dawn, for example, are transitions between âdayâ and ânight,â and not purely one or the other. Human lives are a mix of spiritual and materialâthe Biblical admonition that we donât live by bread alone acknowledges that we do, indeed, live by bread.
The boundaries are where the interesting people live and where interesting things happen. They are the places of strange attractors and chaos. Mysteries dwell in the shadows of dusk and dawn, things unseen and unknown. Anything can happen at an event horizon.
Of course, another fallacy of the dualistic premise is the notion that everything can be reduced to two polar opposites. This is demonstrably not true, even ignoring the boundaries between states. There are at least four naturally occuring states of matter, for example: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma, and theoretically as many as twenty-two. Dualism's either/or premise is tempting for its simplicity, but is far from universally true.
Connection to Characterization
In fiction we need to create credible characters. Lists like the Primal Worlds Beliefs, while limited due the inherent fallacy, give us another way to think about what motivates people and to construct beleivable characters. They can be especially useful in constructing character bios as part of your planning process. Believable characters are certainly more than an assembly of dualisms, but lists like this can still provide one way to think about characters and add depth.
Itâs easy enough to write a character thatâs pure evil. Think Hitler, and go from there. But the exception proves the rule. The most interesting characters are a mix of good and evil and other traits rather than a pure type. The Primal Worlds list lets you construct just such a mix. What makes Raymond Chandlerâs Philip Marlowe interesting is that heâs an anti-hero, a flawed character in a flawed world. The same is true of Sam Spade in Dashiell Hammettâs novels. Both characters are more credible and well-rounded than Agatha Christieâs Miss Marple. The latter might be more fun, but sheâs not as believable.
If you decide to use something like the Primal Worlds Beliefs, chose a mix of beliefs, some optimistic and some pessimistic, to make your characters more credible instead of one-note optimists or pessimists. Most people have a mix of beliefs. Indeed, the Primal Worlds Beliefs makes it easier to construct well-rounded characters with a variety of beliefs.
In movies, Anakin Skywalker âhas good in him,â even though he does the most evil of acts. We see his evolution from a little boy who misses his mother, to the evil dark lord, to his moment of redemption. Hannibal Lector never gets a redeeming moment, but his charm and his sense of justice and humor give him redeeming characteristics. Indeed, his charm makes him more chilling than he might otherwise be. Even the killer in Silence of the Lambs loves his dog. But then, Hitler loved his dog, Blondi, too.
Holy wars are another risk of the Manichean Fallacy: implicit in holy wars is the belief that the ends justify the means. Manichean dualism can lead to exactly this state of mind, where youâre on the side of the angels and any tactic is justified against the devils on the other side, even murder. This provides another way in which dualism can be used in fiction. The relentless Javert in Hugoâs Les Miserable is, in some ways, an example of such a character who eventually has an epiphany and suicides.
In terms of characterization, the point is that dualistic pairings can be helpful in constructing believable characters. Credible characters are a mix of beliefs; they are impure alloys, made stronger for the impurities. The âprimal world beliefsâ are based on textual research and provide one taxonomy of beliefs that can inform character biographies. Just remember to design characters the way an engineer designs an alloy for a beam. The strength of your characterization derives from intentional impurities.
____________________________
References
Scientific American article on "Differences between liberals and conservatives may boil down to one belief"
Website for Primal Beliefs Research Project
Learn your primals
States of Matter
|
Have an opinion on what you've read here today? Then send the Editor feedback! Find an item that you think would be perfect for showcasing here? Submit it for consideration in the newsletter!
https://www.Writing.Com/go/nl_form
Don't forget to support our sponsor!
| ASIN: B07YXBT9JT |
Product Type: Kindle Store
|
Amazon's Price: $ 4.99
|
|
| What topics would you like to see in future newsletters? |
| ASIN: B085272J6B |
Product Type: Kindle Store
|
Amazon's Price: $ 9.99
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, click here for your newsletter subscription list. Simply uncheck the box next to any newsletter(s) you wish to cancel and then click to "Submit Changes". You can edit your subscriptions at any time.
|
For Authors: May 31, 2023 Issue [#11986]
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
