*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://shop.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/2319918-20-April-2024-Community-Guidelines
Printer Friendly Page Tell A Friend
No ratings.
Rated: GC · Non-fiction · Biographical · #2319918
I have thoughts, ideas & observations. I like communication, conversations & discussions.
The content moderation and community guidelines of most online platforms and media outlets follow the diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging model—which is exclusatory to Jews. They all seem to allow antisemitic content to proliferate mostly unchecked, even reinstating accounts which are espousing hateful content and radical ideas, but then they single out and target and ban others who stand up to the bullshit. Probably because the little hateful troll followers of the actual radical groups all use the report function to point out an "issue", which is just a distraction from the real hate and a way to confuse and exploit the censors, moderators, and online "community guidelines."

For instance, my twitter/x account was banned for "violent speech", yet:
"...the Twitter/X account belonging to Australian neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell, the leader of the National Socialist Network and the European Australian Movement, was briefly suspended on April 8 before being reinstated. Sewell claimed that his account was “permanently suspended” on April 8 but then posted an alleged message from Twitter/X restoring his account about 16 hours later. The message claimed the account was returned “under our [X’s] new criteria.”

Also:
I got fired from my government job in BC for adding an Indigenous land acknowledgement to my signature block, which they actually encouraged to do so according to their "standards" which follow the diversity and inclusion model. It is acceptable to make land acknowledgements for Indigenous nations in meetings and presentations online and in-person, and to show your support by adding them to your signature block, along with your pronouns, as long as it is not in support of Jews and their indigenous homeland.
I argued that their standards were biased and exclusatory to Jews in all of my follow up disciplinary meetings, but they kept insisting that I remove it because it didn't align with their "apolitical standards" of diversity, equity, and inclusion. I refused to comply with their biased standards and was eventually terminated for my "controversial statement", which acknowledges the Jews traditional homeland is Israel.

Nothing controversial about that statement unless you are a country doing business with Iran and their terrorist branches and associates who hate Jews, like the IRGC and the Hells Angels, who tend to all be white supremacists, despite their token black members. The HA are well known to be a white supremacist organization, and the IRGC and HAMAS and the rest of the Arab/Muslim/Islamic terrorist groups (oh, and UNRWA, of course) all have a long history of teaching and promoting Jew hatred. The fringes tend to work together, eh? They all share one thing in common and that is hate for the Jews. It is how antisemitism reached such a fervor back in WWI and WWII and spread essentially unchecked and in plain view, without many people seeming to take notice and critically think. They just got swept up in the mob of hate without rationally thinking for themselves.

I'd like to think that teaching history and not indoctrinating kids, and adults, to not think a specific way about a subject would be beneficial to not allow history to repeat itself, but the genocide and hate and systemic targeting of Jews, and other Indigenous peoples: the Yazidis, the many tribes and nations in Canada and the USA continues. The big politicians and corporate players make grand statements and gestures about inclusion and all the support they offer, but that rarely translates into meaningful action on the ground in the real world to the actual humans they claim to support. Their true personalities, their true colors and actions in person (and behind closed doors) do not match their claims of "inclusion" and support and acceptance of "minority groups". Most of their programs are so narrowly defined that no one receives any "benefit" and then they just reuse and recycle the social programs and reintroduce them as some wonderful new benefit to help those communities and peoples in need—and it's only costing another 2.5B, but this time is really going to those in need! The people who really need the support often do not receive it unless they are very pushy and demanding or have a big circle of friends in the "right places" who know how to get "support" from the system or be seen and heard by the media.

Most governments and corporations do not truly respect the land and the indigenous peoples, instead, they use, abuse, and exploit them. They do not provide them with opportunites to support and sustain themselves and their traditional ways. Their policies and regulations prohibit and inhibit forward progress with meaningful steps to "reconciliation". Their spider web labyrinth of bureaucratic red tape doesn't allow them to build appropriate infrastructure and ways to sustain and support their nations and their peoples. They throw money at them, but it gets spent in court fighting the systems in place which are designed to keep us "inferior savages" down and "inline" while they continue to prosper off our suffering and labor.

Source: Comment I wrote on a Facebook post from the Counter Extremism Project (CEP)
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/W53yjVUfHpGVbSBj/?mibextid=xfxF2i
© Copyright 2024 Crystal Dragon (chantellemarie at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Writing.Com, its affiliates and syndicates have been granted non-exclusive rights to display this work.
Printed from https://shop.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/2319918-20-April-2024-Community-Guidelines