Feedback

Narrow minded views the printed, they couldn’t resist

There is some confusion here. Rabbits theoretical material used is clearly linked to the primary text, however it is somewhat unclear. Rabbit’s style is very erratic. Rabbit has to many sentences that are poorly constructed. Rabbit, there is some confusion here. Rabbit does not give a coherent and precise definition. Rabbit does not use the footnote function. Rabbit needs to explain when and where it is developed . Rabbit, many of the details have been omitted and italicize function is incorrectly applied. Rabbit wanders off the point at times. Rabbit cannot apply a Greek model to Hamlet. Rabbit it was poor to consistently spell harmartia . Rabbit left the work plain ad disappointing. Rabbit gets somewhat confused about
At least Rabbit tried, god dammit, at least he did that.