Question of the Day!

Let's grab this can o' worms 'n' cut some cane poles . . .

Is the review an example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect, where the reviewer mistakenly believes they understand what they read and like it, but don't have the background to realize they don't understand it?

Or is this review an example of someone who understands the material and doesn't like it, but has difficulty expressing themselves negatively?

I would have other questions, such as the reviewer's review history, what's in their bio, how do they normally write?

Would I contact them? Doubtful.