Hello Jeff-o'-lantern 🎃  . Thank you for entering this month's contest. Congratulations on your victory this month. The other entry was as good as yours, but I thought you showed more realism about the usefulness of AI.
As the official Judge of this contest, I have the following comments to offer for "It's All Derivative" 
Did you answer the question?
Yes, essentially, you argue that there is nothing new under the sun and that all human efforts are derivative. Only God creates ex nihilo. Both AI and humans are simply repacking outputs into inputs. Only empathy saves the human writer from artistic oblivion, and our ability to interpret and give meaning.
Use of quotes, proof-texting or AI - could I hear your voice?
This reads as original work, and the spelling mistake indicates that you wrote it without a corrective tool.
How consistent was your argument?
This was short but consistent.
My thoughts on the substance of what you said
As with Solomon, when he said the same in Ecclesiastes, I tend to disagree with your conclusions. Mainly because we do not live under an empty sky, and human actions in response to an infinite God and in a changing world, moving from beginning to end, will always have an element of creativity and surprise to them. We are, after all, made in God's image.
AI represents, if anything, a new creative frontier and a new set of writing tools, adding speed, scale, access, and testing possibilities for writers that have never existed before. This is more than just a time-to-market thing; a greater range of ideas, facts, and new synergies can be processed and contemplated like never before.
Humans may have devoted considerable historical energy to the invention of pantheons of demigods and superheroes. These perform in endless soap operas of mythical superhuman actions - humans connect to them in temples and rituals, with statues, dance, smells, bells, and around the campfires/TVs/Mobiles as they hear the stories told and retold. But as Christians, we believe in a God who authentically talks back and whose revelation is the perfect foundation and framework for creativity. Even if the world feels just like an endless churn of sequels to some historic epic, there was a moment when the thought was original and the story was being told for the first time. If we have a beginning and an end, then each unique story has its special place and moment. Shakespeare framed a version of English nationalism that still abides; Dickens added a social conscience for the poor of the Victorian era; Tolkien stretched our minds into a parallel universe of possibilities. In China, the Tale of the Three Kingdoms, following the fall of the Han, latched on to the abiding fear of disunity that haunts Chinese culture, and the Art of War is a timeless epic that encapsulates the wisdom of fighting that characterizes those interludes of chaos.
We needed the parallel universe of Tolkien and the language games of the philosopher Wittgenstein, and the invention of computers and the internet before we could envisage artificial intelligences able to process the entire knowledge of the world ínto new formats. That in itself is something new.
You focused on empathy as the human advantage. AI can, of course, create words that make people cry. Will a synthetic human with an AI brain offer a hug that feels the same in some distant future? Does it matter if the empathy is human or synthetic, or that it ministers to the felt need? Or is this all a matter of degree and the extent to which it no longer feels awkward or inauthentic?
Truly, we need one who dwells among us, who has experienced our finitude, pain, and mortality and has yet passed their tests, one who connects us to the infinite well of creativity, life, love, and light that is God Almighty and opens up the heavens to our thoughts and writing. In Christ, we have such a high priest. That AI might seek to imitate him seems impossible, and all its server farms will never be able to reach the boundaries of a universe made by the Creator of all and, at the same time, connect us to human flesh and blood with what sounds like the beating heart of a human being.
The flood of words today is overwhelming; finding the diamond in the coal mine is what matters. We do not want the empathy of ugly fake fools. The question becomes whose voice is this, and why should I listen? Resonance is the fruit of successful empathy, but it is also a matter of quality and connection to the Divine image that resides in all. With what authority/spirit does this person speak? Maybe this will change the way we write as we seek the soul of the author, test the extent to which he speaks into our times, place the metanarrative of his beliefs into a hierarchy, and review the credentials he offers against an infinite array of competitors. To stand out from the crowd, authenticity, connection, beauty and meaning will still matter as much in the future as they do now.
I cannot say exactly what writing and writers forums like this will look like in 25 years. But I suspect that they will host a good many excellent writers who develop stories never heard before and find new ways to connect readers to God, the Universe, and everyone. It is not just a matter of endless recombination to entertain but rather of connecting the reader to meaning in the here and now in a way that reaches out for eternity. In fact, that task will not be complete until the Kingdom Come.
Mechanical issues
You can have it summarize a bunch of self-help books on dealing with loss and simply simplify them into major bullet points.
Thanks again for entering.
LightinMind 
"My Philosophy of Rating and Reviewing"
|