\"Writing.Com
Printed from https://shop.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/simondoerr
Review Requests: ON
120 Public Reviews Given
127 Total Reviews Given
Review Style
I will give the kind of review that I wish people gave me: rather detailed with emphasis on areas that need growth and areas that are pretty good already. And I'll review pretty much anything, whether a poem or an entire novel or anything in between. Admittedly, though, I do tend to be absent-minded, so it does happen that you might have to resend me the review request, but I promise I'll get around to it eventually.
Alternatively, if you ask, I can give you a scathing review with no fluff, if that is what you desire. However, in general, I'll give a polite, padded review.
If you're looking for a reviewer for your novel, I am open to doing chapter by chapter reviews. If that's what you want, please email me.
I'm good at...
editing Fantasy books. I've read more fantasy books than pretty much anybody, and I'm willing to read longer books including novels.
Favorite Genres
Fantasy, Sci-fi, Non-fiction
Least Favorite Genres
Romance, Erotica
Favorite Item Types
Novel, Novella, Book
Least Favorite Item Types
Interactive Stories
I will not review...
anything with graphic descriptions of sex/war and retain discretion to not review books that fall too far outside my moral standards.
Public Reviews
<   1  2  3  4   >
1
1
Review of Never Fit In  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Hi! This is a very relatable poem for me, as I too don't fit in. I surmise that's the reason most people go to writing, not fitting in or a similar problem, and I'm sure on here you can find quite a few other people who empathize with this plight.
It's a good choice that you decided to go with no rhyme scheme, especially with the subject of your poem, even clever. I've seen too many forced rhymes recently, it's good you don't feel that pressure.
I will say, this is a hard poem to read aloud, on the basis of a complete lack of rhythm, but that is personal preference. However, it's a good rule of thumb that, with larger lines, you should have a rhythm to make it easy to read. With really short lines or choppy fragments rhythm isn't necessary, but it still helps those too.
The main thing I was confused about, though, was the "you" that appears about halfway through the poem. Why is that existent and who is it? Is the point to get me to wonder that? In that case, you're very clever indeed.
But you write emotion well, which is hard to come by, and I liked reading the poem, and it was legible, which is also really good. It's not perfect, but everybody has to start somewhere, and I'm certainly no perfect poet (or anywhere near that) myself. Thanks for sharing, I hope you've found some solutions to this (although it's likely you haven't, considering how new this poem is), and I hope you stick around and keep writing.

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
2
2
Review of Dance  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (3.0)
Hi! I came across your poem in the Read a Newbie section, and I was quickly intrigued. You've chosen a subject here that has such high potential to make a splendid poem. However, while your poem is pretty good, it could be better (as could everything, though).
First thing: you're talking about dancing. This gives you the perfect opportunity to use a lilting rhythm and nice rhymes. I'll get to the rhymes later. Frankly, this poem is hard to read when it should flow naturally. Have you tried reading it aloud? Especially with poetry, that can help a lot with identifying which lines to tune up. For an example of a rhythm you could use, take these lines -
"Dancing is fun, it really is,
Watch me and I'll show you all there is."
The first line flows well to read, the second line comes across as clunky when paired with the first line, as your rhyme attempts to do. As an alternative, you could do something like (though this isn't great, it just illustrates my point) -
"Dancing is fun, it really is,
Here - I'll show you all there is."
You can see how it leads to a natural stress upon every other syllable in the second line, even though it doesn't look quite as nice. It simply illustrates the point. Or this -
"Dancing comes in different forms,
but to be honest, there is no norms."
The 'honest' flows weird, and accentuating 'is' is kinda weird. So, as an alternative,
"Dancing comes in different forms,
but to be frank, there are no norms."
Do you see what I mean? Your work looks nicer, but it doesn't read well when, with your subject matter, while you could have some lines read awkwardly, they should be deliberately and clearly awkward, not just weird phrasing.
But anyway, that's rhythm.
Your rhymes, you know what's a stretch and what isn't. You rhyme is with is, and rhyme count with groove, both of which are like "huh?". Perhaps that was just a simple oversight.
And then one more suggestion - you seem to have a great sense of drama with your first line, not seeming to rhyme with anything else. Rather than being an outlier, that actually accentuates it very nicely, a good effect. The problem is, you seem to have rhymed something with it in the conglomeration of a second line, which made me disappointed because you really had something with the unrhyming first line. For that matter, the first line doesn't need rhythm either.
Again, this is all suggestion, take it or leave it as you wish. But this work definitely reads like a newbie trying to write poetry and, while I'm not very good at writing poetry myself, I've read enough poetry that this one kinda stood out as being really hard to read right, no matter which direction I looked at it from. The words are good, but you're missing
the flow, which is the most important part of poetry, by far, far surpassing good grammar and all that. Good grammar is probably a hindrance to good poetry.
Nevertheless, your poem still intrigued me, and despite the above-mentioned problems, you still managed to get emotion across, which is really good potential, and I feel you really could make something remarkable out of this work - because no matter how flawed a work is, it's still work, and practice makes perfect. And I've probably been too harsh through here as well. I've certainly read far worse poetry, and you at least seem to have a sense of what you want to write and how rhyme works and a desire to use it, rather than just throwing words around.
So, summary:
you need flow. You have a good framework, but it doesn't flow. If you could catch flow in this poem, it would really sparkle, as it is, it's like an uncut diamond - doesn't look very good, but has potential... but if not used carefully, is still good for sharpening things. Practice makes perfect.
Thanks for sharing, I hope you do stay around, and keep writing!

This is a very rambly
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
3
3
Review of Winter Travels  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (3.5)
You have an interesting start that I would read on from, a nice cliffhanger at the end to hook the reader, and creativity to make your work stand out, which makes for a pretty good first chapter.
Your main character is consistent throughout the chapter, which is key. Nice job with that.
Your grammar needs some work, but I'm sure you already knew that. It does make the chapter rather hard to read, though, nevertheless, and mistakes are all over the place. I could provide some examples if you want, but especially around dialogue it is very messy.
Could you add a space between your paragraphs? That would make them easier to understand and less of a big block of text. That would have helped me enjoy the work a good bit more.
I noted your had some specific world details replaced with ___. Great! That is very much a second draft problem, it's good that you're not worried about perfection yet.
It's kinda hard to go more specific when it's so hard to read, but what I could decipher was interesting enough that, if you add more of this work to the site, I'd appreciate you letting me know so I can read further, as I liked reading it and would like to read on. Thanks for sharing, I hope you have a great time here, and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review. Feel free to join!
4
4
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (5.0)
This is a quite creative work, that I honestly expected to fall far short of the mark. While it's true that much of it is pulled from the classic tale containing the Grinch, nevertheless your work fits the tradition nicely and was a pleasant read.
I think the (Almost) in your title takes away from the work, especially the parallel between it and the original, which simply in the title states the grinch stealing christmas. It's like putting the ending on the back of your book - well, sure, everybody knows it'll happen, but that doesn't mean you should tell them that. No spoilers.
A couple of your couplets are a bit of a stretch, but they seem to work, so, yeah. "so mean, oh so mean" comes across as the biggest stretch, but it does fit the rhythm scheme, which seems to be a miracle.
Being extremely fickle with ellipses (...) it seems more applicable to use ' - ' where your ellipses are, but that's personal preference.
I liked that work, ...is it actually a book? If so, fun! Other than that, thanks for sharing and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
5
5
Review of Amen  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.0)
You bring a lot of emotion into this poem, pleading with its repetition for something you feel has been lost, and it does come across, really.
The poem isn't perfect, though, even though it could be. Most are just simple mistakes (a missing comma between melody and as, or Amen insists rather than Amen insist), but the second line, another "Amen", seems to stick out like a sore thumb, ruining the symmetry of the poem and seeming unnecessary, as if forced to get the poem to fit into 8 lines rather than 7. It really takes away a lot.
But I did like reading this poem, I read it more than once while reading it and still liked it, and it conveys emotion quite nicely. Thanks for sharing and keep writing!

This is a very late at night
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
6
6
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.5)
Hello! First, I see you're new, welcome to the site, but anyway, you really have a knack for phrasing things clearly (just like in your one about magic, which I ran into earlier, read, appreciated, but didn't feel as though I had enough to say about to review) and openly, while still coming along as conversational, rather than just stiff. You put everything out on the table, show politely how yours is right, and back it up thoroughly, which would be great if everybody did that.
Most of the typical critiques for literary works don't quite apply here, as it's more an essay than a story, but I do have one suggestion - could you use some formatting? The Arial normal-size font is very legible (my favorite font to read), but it does eventually get blocky without any bolding or italics throughout the work. Those would be a great touch in the headers.
But yeah, I liked reading that, it seems practical, thanks for sharing and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
7
7
Review of I'm Here to Help  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (5.0)
This is an enjoyable to read, creative work, well worth my time to review. It's just, frankly, good sci-fi.
One odd thing - it said he was a 911 operator in the 21st century, then we're in the 29th century, which is a bit of an unexplained gap.
Apart from that, it's a very clean work, not much to comment on, not much gaping adventure to gasp at, just technically slick. I wish I had more to say, but don't, so, thanks for sharing, it was a good read, and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review
8
8
Review of "O"  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
You start with a nice premise that drew me in, as a reader, and I wondered what you would do with such a strange letter, and it was interesting to read as well.
However, with such a short work, it's worth pointing out even really small faults.
First line: should be one's love, not ones love, but other than that, a great start, interesting
Second line: another good one, clean, interesting, creative
Third line: not very logical, perhaps 'outcast's heartbeat'? that would maintain the O start
Fourth line: I think you mean "ocean observed", but ooh, interesting
Fifth line: ...huh? that's just O words. No longer making sense.
Sixth line: 'overwhelmed, outmatched' would make sense. what you have is another "huh?"
Seventh line: out of place, but ok
Eighth line: "October outlasted"? that'd be an interesting ending, if cleaned up.
All in all, I was intrigued by the poem, which delivered on its premise, but it was hard to read due to little mistakes. Feel free to ignore everything I wrote above, it's all just suggestion, and being a very literal reader, it's likely I read over something important. But I did like reading this, thanks for sharing, and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
9
9
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.5)
I can really read this poem out loud, first try, and it's fun to read, a good point, neat, and you even put in the time to format it on here, which is a really nice touch.
DISCLAIMER: if this is not intended to be a rap, you might as well disregard everything written below. I read it as a rap.
The line: "And I cry... "If only I could rise..."" doesn't really fit the rest of the poem. I mean, it's a nice line, but it doesn't match, sticks out like a sore thumb. Your other non-rhyming line fits because it's at the end, but this one feels like it needs a friend and a bit more of itself to flow within the rest of the poem. On fourth thought, maybe it makes sense, it's just jarring. Take what you will from that.
Your ending is really nice. ...yeah.
Hmm... what else... idk, I like what you did with this, it's hard to give suggestions because it's easy to make things fit. Nice job, thanks for sharing, and keep writing!

This is a slightly impressed
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
10
10
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.0)
Mmm, this poem exudes pain, longing... well, in other words, it's pretty good. It takes a cliche saying, a nice point, and turns it into something that hurts and is completely different - the essence of creativity. Nice job.
I'm rather confused by your line scheme. Why do some have three and some have four and some have five? There doesn't seem to be rhyme or rhythm to justify some of the line cutoffs, it just seems like personal preference, which unnerved me some while reading it. Would it be difficult to change it to all four lines, or is there some hidden message I missed?
This paragraph:
"Because some photos
don’t capture love—
they capture performance."
came across as jarring, like it didn't fit the rest of the poem's pained repetition and longing. Do with that as you will.
But I did like this poem, it was creative, and overall quite good. Nice job, thanks for sharing, and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
11
11
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (4.5)
I really like the way you've written this. It's not the most engaging, not particularly dramatic, not particularly trustworthy - just how most people would write. It's not often to find an author who writes how they talk, and rather refreshing.
I would comment on sentence structure... if not for the fact that it works and sounds realistic. It doesn't really detract from the story, and the narrator isn't really weaving a tale, he's more just journaling. Most people don't journal dramatically, and so, good.
Your spider picture is a strange page break. It's very striking, but not completely accurate with your descriptions of the spider from the story, I don't think. The story says it were rather realistic, I guess, but that's just a spider. Maybe I'm being too particular and used to my typical page breaks.
"...which I thought unnessary, but I had little choice." Ought to be unnecessary, just a misspelling.
Your last three paragraphs switch tense randomly in a way that doesn't make sense. Perhaps fix that? oh well.
All in all, coming from a non-horror reader, your work struck me as neat, cleanly written, and could be scary to someone who wanted to be scared, which is what you were trying for. Nice job, thanks for sharing, and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
12
12
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
This work was easy to envision, a great suspenseful ending, some nice exposition, and quick enough that I would read the second chapter (well, if there was one, I see the contest didn't ask for one), which says a lot.
One thing did really stick out to me that you could have improved - your last sentence, your clincher, the suspenseful sentence - isn't formatted right. It's a run-on sentence, and in the most prominent place possible. Personally, I think it would look best on its own line, italicized, like
"...Jacob gasped, recognizing it instantly.
It was his father's hat."
It puts it out by itself, making it even more striking, without even changing a single word.
This sentence is clunky: "They never saw the body though when he died.". There are some different things you could do to improve it, but I'd say the best solution would likely be to read this aloud to yourself and see what's hard to read and/or clunky. I feel as though that could fix nearly all of the little quibbly illegibilities without me listing them all. Then again, that was the only thing I was really confused about reading, this paragraph. Perhaps it could be clarified slightly. How did stock farmers get ahold of artillery?
I did like reading this, and I would read on, although I'm not sure where you'd go from here. Perhaps that's the best type of writing. Nice job and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
13
13
Review of Malignancy  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: ASR | (4.5)
Mmm, that is a nice poetry form, does drive the point home as you say. Some nice wording choices too.
A couple little suggestions:
First: capitalization. I know, I know, it's extremely picky, but wouldn't it look nice for your sets of three to only have the first one capitalized and use semicolons? I think it was mostly the capital W in "Words virally sprawl through the ether around." that I didn't really like the looks of. Very picky.
I like the way the form pulls back the line from the beginning to end it, that's a nice touch. Took me a bit to realize it wasn't an error in the poetry, but it's a nice touch. Perhaps just choose more... common words in your repeated phrase, the repetition of "inundating" was quite something to read aloud.
All in all, I liked the poem, and thanks for sharing and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
14
14
Review of Enchantment  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: ASR | (4.5)
You follow the form well, weaving something into a bare framework that honestly seems very hard to work with.
It took me a bit to figure it out, perhaps that was intentional, perhaps I should have read the subtitle first. Not sure.
Can't say I liked the feeling of this poem as much as some I've read, but I think that's more the style of the poem than the poem's fault, it doesn't really resound with me. To each their own.
You seem to work the style well. I don't have much suggestion on what to improve, it's grammatically clean to the extent that any critiques can only be subjective, so, nicely done and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
15
15
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (3.0)
Seeing as I've already reviewed you, I can be a bit more blunt here, so less sandwiching.
Flashbacks: I love them. Flashbacks are a great touch, good for giving background, useful for basing the reader, just flat-out good. However, always italicize your flashbacks. Always. Not only does it give the reader something to go off of, knowing it's a flashback, it's also a lot easier to read and cleaner to edit. It's a nice flashback, by the way, just italicize it. With the new editor (I can show you how to get to it if you don't know how), it's just ctrl+i, same as a google doc or word doc or whatever you use.
Some clever work in here, a lot of dialogue, but very basic dialogue. Maybe I'm just reading it too late at night. I'm sure this work would read a lot better aloud than just on the paper. I can envision some of these lines reading it again having been said in a dramatic tone of voice, but it didn't really come across the first time I read it. Again, maybe i'm reading it too late at night.
Your work is very explanatory. I'm wondering if it will go anywhere. There is something to be said about the ineffectiveness of chapters which can be summed up in just a sentence... it's just too summarizable by "Inspector comes and wants to shut the school down. Perturbing." More detail! Intrigue! Something exciting! Inner-teacher drama! Your school is too prim and proper. Give some teacher strife, something to show it's falling apart, conflict, I don't know. There's just nothing there. (I'm being a bit scathing, but you get the general idea).
But again, I could read it, I got ahold of it, the characters made sense, all that, clean, neat, yeah. Legibility is nice.

This is not as dainty of a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
16
16
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (3.5)
A nice chapter, which I was able to follow easily (that's massive, if a reader can't follow it you'd be in big trouble, and I've read a lot that I couldn't), and that made sense, laying a foundation for what's to come. What you'd want in a Chapter 1.
Imma say it, though - the chapter was boring. Nothing really happened, we're just in a serene school, no sense of panic, no worry, no real stakes, just... exposition. Exposition is nice and all, but I could use some motivation to read the rest of the book. Now, as I'm saying this, there is one part that really did draw me in - this line - "And perhaps, just perhaps, she was about to discover that being a small, quiet, mediocre witch on a deprived estate was exactly what The Dollhouse needed to survive." Now that's stakes, that's laying something down, that's interesting! Potential! The rest of it was just words that made sense.
You also use a lot of present tense. Don't. It's as simple as that.
I like your bolding. I don't really like your font. You could probably use italics for thoughts and/or other things, could make it stand out. I get it's hard to have action with just one person, but try showing, not telling - rather than going off and saying "the school is short on money, in ruins, oof" you could have Shirley talking to a candidate saying "we're short on funds, do you realize this?" That would get the same point across in a more interesting matter.
Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon has a bunch of stuff on that subject, he might be slightly crazed about it, to be perfectly honest, but if you're looking for advice, he's always happy to give it.
But you made sense! I can't tell you how many fantasy novels (assuming that's where you're going, given witches) that didn't make sense in the first chapter, and that you have that going for you is splendid. I'll be checking out in the next few days where this story goes, and I hope you stick around and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review. Feel free to join!
17
17
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (2.0)
This is a sad snippet with a nice sentiment at the end, something that could be woven into something larger.
However, it is not.
I think you know your grammar and mechanics could use some work. In the dropnote, I have included what would have been correct grammar, without changing any words. It's a lot easier to read with proper punctuation.
Grammar ▶︎
Apart from the mechanics and grammar mistakes that make it hard to read, even when it's fixed I'm not sure I understand the point of this work. What does the moral have to do with the story? It's a sad story, yeah, but what holding on is there? How am I supposed to get that out of this?
I mean, it's a sad story... I feel like you could have done so much more with it. Perhaps you could try expanding the story, adding some dialogue? One of the benefits of writing short is the addition of suspense and hitting hard, but neither is really done by this story, it seems like you mostly just rambled a paragraph about something that happened, which you could have done a lot more out of. What happens after? What happens during? What led to it? What could we know about these people? Why should this apply to me? What is the point?
This story, or snippet, I should say, is a start, which is more than most people have, but I can't honestly say it's much more than one. Perhaps you're new to writing. Perhaps this is just a first draft. Perhaps I'm just not reading it right. But from what I can tell, it seems you spent a couple of minutes writing this, figured it was good enough, and then posted it on here, and the state it's in, I can't really say much positive about it, unfortunately. But if you're looking for writing advice from somebody who's really good at writing, you could check out Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon, he has a lot of good advice on the subject. Maybe he can help you out. Either way, I hope you keep writing, practice makes perfect!

This is a "The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review. Everybody is welcome to join.
18
18
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.0)
Your poem is very thoughtful, reminiscent, what it intends to be. It's a nice poem through and through.
Some suggestions:
First, your line scheme is in the middle of the line. While it rhymes, it seems like it'd be more intuitive to split it into two lines, the rhyming word ending each line. It would make it easier to read and understand, rather than the big lines.
Second, in your second line (first set), your rhyme scheme isn't the same as the rest of the work, you do "AABA" rather than your rest of the poem "AABB" scheme. Unintentional, I'm sure.
Third, I feel like you could have used some rhythm to this. Surely it wouldn't be that hard, it's not as though you used your thesaurus heavily in this one. As it is, the lack of rhythm is the biggest thing holding it back.
But your poem does come across as both tired and hopeful, old and young, which is exactly what you were going for. Nice job.
Thanks for sharing and keep writing!

This is another late
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
19
19
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.5)
I know how you feel, being forced to put on a show like you're ok when everything is falling apart, hiding who you really are - I do it on a regular basis. Sometimes all you can do is wait it out and hope college comes sooner, where you can finally be yourself (or at least that's the hope. reality is often different). Sometimes it feels like they aren't even trying to look at all.
I noticed you have three copies of this in your portfolio. Is this intentional? I suppose it might generate more views, but I'm not sure if that's quite the principle of the matter. Is it a matter of not being able to find how to edit an item? I could help with that if you want.
On to the poem - it really does feel like you're talking into it, not really form, not really reason, just... desperation. Accurate desperation (odd how that works, when you write desperate sentences, the poem sounds desperate), but perhaps could have been spiced up a bit more, to use the term? A little more striking repetition, more hopelessness, more despair? I guess that'd be less accurate, but it could add to the flair of the poem. Perhaps flair isn't what you're going for, perhaps you want validation, understanding? I mean, I know how that feels... it's rough. I do hope it gets better for you somehow. I hope you find a friend. I hope writing can stay an outlet for everything you need to say, and I hope you find this site to be the encouraging community you need. Thanks for sharing.

This is a late
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review. You're invited to join *Smile*
20
20
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.5)
You prove your point nicely, leading along a logical pathway to many faceted endings. It made sense and was easy to read, and I do agree with it also.
In your first paragraph, I think the adage is "form
follows function". A quibble, perhaps, but nevertheless a quibble.
I think, however, your indisputable points miss the main bulk of the prompt - I think it was more wondering music in general rather than worship music. For example, you miss pop music entirely. Is pop music good or bad? That would be a far more opinionated issue, which I think the prompt-maker intended more.
Your points are indisputable, though, and quite true, and backed up well with verses (citations are not my strength, personally). It is a very technically clean and neat work, legible, nice... just misses the point.
Thanks for sharing, good luck, and keep writing!

This is a slightly overly-pessimistic
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
21
21
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.0)
What a last line. Really brought the whole work under a new perspective, a little humor to brighten up what could be a dark poem, a snicker in a faded world.
Your "No." is another nice touch, cutting off the poem abruptly. Another line that stuck out to me was "deep dark blue blares", nice alliteration was fun to read.
The allegory is a bit hard to understand, although some of that could be accredited to the late hour of which I am writing this, and some poetry is intended to be confusing.
It's kinda nice picturesque language, though albeit I've seen better, with more potent corrolaries.
Yeah, the last line really adds hope to the work, which is really nice.
You use repetition well as well.
Where your work also could use some work - emotion doesn't come out as much as it could. More desperation, perhaps? More impending doom, perhaps? I don't know for sure, nor am I good enough at poetry to explain how such a thing would be done.
I do hope your days brighten up later, thanks for sharing, and keep writing!

This is a rather tired
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
22
22
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (3.0)
Well, horror isn't quite my genre, but this is a crisp work, easy to read and making a lot of sense.
Now that that's over with, what you really want is feedback. Let's start with...

Formatting
I'm sure you can tell from a cursory glance that your first paragraph is a different font than the others. Both make sense, but I do think I actually prefer the second, more basic font as far more legible than the fancy one. Regardless, it is your story and you can pick whatever font you want.
I thought it was an interesting choice how much space you use in your line breaks. It did aid legibility significantly, true, but when it came to dialogue, it didn't really make much sense. A simple one line spacing should work better than your current, which appears to be about four or five lines.
Is it just me or does the font change randomly in other places too? I don't know for sure.

Grammar
In general, your grammar seems pretty sound. A couple of things:
"vicegenarian" - in your first sentence - I have a pretty large vocabulary, but first, google says it should be "vicenarian", but I've also never heard of that. Generally, it's good to use terms your readers know, and while octogenarian might be in people's vocabulary, the "vice-" suffix is not.
""Come out," I said, "You're only prolonging the inevitable."" Something about this sentence seems wrong. I'm not sure what.

Content
I don't think you really needed an 18+ rating on this, but I understand the unsureness.
Well. It comes across as kinda adventurous, kinda suspenseful, but lacking the adventure and suspense, the thrill of the chase. It comes across as the narrator would have said it - bland, boring, just how it is.
The side characters are pretty realistic, which is good. Genuine reactions.

Other
I think... you could have used more description, more creativity in your dialogue, more suspense. Maybe that's not what you were going for, though. It didn't really scare me, it seemed like happy horror.
And I don't know your religion, but that would have been a perfect opportunity, near the end, to show what you believe, to stick up for it. But it is understandable that you don't.

Overall
Overall, this is a neat, crisp work, but one that could use some personality and flavor. It seems, overall, to lack a point. But never the less, all writing is writing, and practice makes perfect. Thanks for sharing and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
23
23
Review of An Odd Duck  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.5)
This is a really nice work. I came across it far earlier in the day, and couldn't get the cliffhanger out of my mind, and so I figured I might as well go back and tell you about it. I hadn't ever thought of taking a story like this from the perspective of somebody who isn't the perpetrator, and it was a great idea.
I read it in the first place because I saw "duck" in the title and I love ducks. Sadly, no ducks involved, but still well-written.
I don't know, she makes sense to me. Maybe because I'm an odd duck myself...
"Then, one afternoon, ..." rather than "Then one afternoon, ...", this isn't a journal entry, it seems, as all other grammar and punctuation is perfect, something nobody does on accident.
As I said, amazing cliffhanger, love how there isn't even anything after it, and a nice read overall. Thanks for sharing and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
24
24
Review of Winter Fire  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
This poem flows really well. I'm always a fan of ellipses (...) and they do seem to add quite a bit to the read-aloud-ability of this poem. The rhythm is simple enough, and the rise and fall of the verses and how it should be read was clear to me, which was really nice.
As for meaning, (although I'm not an expert on meaning, I take things too literally), it was a bit confusing, but I feel as if it would have made a lot of sense had I been able to get my head around what "distant pains we should retire" was referring to. I could get your analogies (impressive, uncommon), but couldn't quite piece it all together. Your simple subtitle did help.
I liked your title, just making sure you intended to repeat the first paragraph in the fourth paragraph, but it did make sense there, the half-as-long verse in the middle a nice touch, and oh, yeah, it was really good how your lines were almost all the same length.
The emotion could have come through a little more, but I'm not sure how I'd do that in your shoes.
All in all, I liked reading this poem (honestly did, most poems are boring to read), and I hope to see more of your work in the future. Thanks for finding your way here, however you did, and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review, feel welcome to join!
25
25
Review of Life is Good  Open in new Window.
Review by Charles Nasby Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with The Power Reviewers Group  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.5)
Well, relieving that this is fiction, not real, otherwise that would have been quite a travesty. One moth causing a disaster for weeks is something the world could indeed use less of.
Your humor at the start and end of the work is a nice touch and far improved what would otherwise have been a rather boring work. The talking seemed real, which was nice, if assumed as a journal entry, which it seems to be.
Some of the grammar isn't perfect, but that just makes it feel more realistic, as most people don't think in complete sentences all the time.
For the sake of a suggestion, unless you want the writer to sound bouncy and hyper, you could use some ellipses (...) or other trails to make it seems less butterfly-y, flitting from one thought to another, rambling. For example, one could be used before the third sentence - "How can two small children do so much damage to the cleanliness of a house in such a short time? ...ok, two small and one huge." Just a suggestion.
This was a nice read from top to bottom. Thanks for sharing and keep writing!

This is a
"The Power Reviewers GroupOpen in new Window. review.
80 Reviews *Magnify*
Page of 4 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://shop.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/simondoerr