Here we go round the merry-go-round with WHICH TYPE OF REVIEW DO YOU PREFER, a poll item from author/ member/ pollster
Jenn L Sullivan.
Jenn, believe it, Teff tried one of these once. Most folks preferred the answer of Meat & Potatoes Review. My item was about Fluff Revs. So similiar thoughts float between us, Jenn L Sullivan. Mine (the Teff Rev Poll) long since deleted, having taken enough slack and unsavory revs.
Still here on WC, the word itself, a review is in and of itself not exactly a real review. Which is also addressed in:
"Reviewing Wisdom 1, 2, 3 GO!"
The unsatisfied quest for how to review, what to expect in a review, etc, etc, is an ongoing subject for many writers/ members as well as readers, raters and revvers.
Your poll is fine, lives up to most of your intro. Overdone, constant compliments in a rev are startling sometimes. We see the likes of: brilliant, lots of I likes, I thinks, I might change ... not always in those specific words of course.
And as readers, writers, authors we still strive on and on to do our best. As authors we write reviews. Sure, we get really neat-o thank you notes, I know I do.
What is not mentioned often enough is promo for the author. In order that others visit his/her/ portfolio.
Another objection, and this is personal, Teff likes to see the author's name used in a review on PRP. Then readers and reviwers and fellow authors hear the name, see the names, remember the name, and maybe decide to read that particular pen name.
Similar to a short story or a chapter. When one starts out and says the character's name more than a few times VS he / she or YOU.
Public Reviews is for the public. So maybe, just maybe, without marking in your poll, MISS JENN L. SULLIVAN, the latter, actually naming writers of the many fine items found on our fair website .... might be thoroughly considered to be noted inside a basic review, instead of "YOU" and authors's names written during reviewing by ALL.
Cordially, TEFF slinging the helpful hints.
|
|